Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Rollback

User:Telfordbuck

• Telfordbuck (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Reason for requesting rollback rights Telfordbuck (talk) 12:18, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done No reason for rollback given -Fastily 23:01, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I feel like an idiot for not seeing that! It is so I can have access to the AntiVandal tool. Telfordbuck (talk) 19:09, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed your recent contributions, and to be honest I'm not seeing a lot of actual anti-vandalism work. I see you making some reverts, but you consistently fail at warning editors when you revert their edits. As far as I can tell, many of these are good faith edits. Even if these are indeed disruptive, it's not obvious because you don't ever explain why. Now, I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers. If you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor; I recommend using tools such as Twinkle or RedWarn which make this very easy. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges before reapplying. Thanks, Fastily 23:40, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cabrils

• Cabrils (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Hi, I've recently been granted New Page Reviewer rights (to help with the new page review backlog); 1yr+ AfC reviewer (about 700 articles); currently enrolled in the Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy course; 300+ AFD discussions (with 94% matching outcomes); familiar with and use Twinkle and Earwig's Copyvio Detector. I've been using Huggle as a non-logged in user, and granting me rollback rights would enable proper functionality. I realise usually enrollees of the CVUA would not apply for rollback rights until they had completed the course, but in this instance where I am now have NPP rights, having rollback would make the task more efficient. Happy to have a trial if that's more appropriate. With appreciation, Cabrils (talk) 01:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & RedWarn can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 02:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will do, thanks. Cabrils (talk) 02:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Liu1126

• Liu1126 (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Good day! I was temporarily granted rollback almost two months ago (link) and now I would like to request to be granted this permission permanently so that I can continue fighting vandalism using Huggle. Thanks! Liu1126 (talk) 10:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 1 January 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 10:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]