Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect autopatrol list

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rosguill (talk | contribs) at 17:41, 6 March 2023 (→‎LordVoldemort728: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This page is for requesting access to the redirect autopatrol pseudoright. If you wish to discuss this list, its requirements, or NPP in general, please do so at the NPP discussion page.

Guidelines

The criteria for this pseudoright is an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects.

For a request to be considered successful it must have been open for at least 24 hours with the consensus of at least 3 editors who possess the new page reviewer permission (which includes all administrators). After two weeks, if a request does not have the individual consensus of 3 reviewers the request will be automatically closed. Alternatively an administrator may close a request as successful or unsuccessful at any time as part of standard individual administrative discretion for the granting of user rights.

Closed requests will be archived to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect autopatrol list/Old requests after a minimum of three calendar days[a] following the close of the discussion.

Notes

  1. ^ Per this discussion on the user talk page of one of the New Pages Patrol coordinators.

Requests

GuardianH

GuardianH (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) Experienced editor with 11k edits who has created 145 redirects. Of those 147, only their first 2 creations were deleted at AfD (not MfD, so they were likely turned into articles). I don't see a need to manually review their redirects. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. FWIW, it's a long-term bug for some reason all deleted pages, including articles and other non-redirect pages, show up when you generate a xtools Page Creation report. signed, Rosguill talk 17:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PickleG13

PickleG13 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) Editor has over 7k edits at the moment and has created a total of 235 redirects, of which 219 are live.

  • 188 redirects created since the start of 2022
  • 7 of those redirects have since been deleted
    • 4 under G8 rationale (target had been deleted)
    • 1 under G6 rationale
    • 1 under G12 rationale (likely made into an article)
    • 1 expired prod (likely made into an article)

I don't believe their redirects need to be patrolled. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:21, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done signed, Rosguill talk 17:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LordVoldemort728

LordVoldemort728 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) Experienced editor with over 14k edits who has created 248 redirects. Of those, 7 have been deleted (4 AfD, 1 RfD, 1 G6, 1 G8). I don't think their redirects need to be me manually reviewed. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:30, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done signed, Rosguill talk 17:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moondragon21

Moondragon21 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) Experienced user with over 37k edits that has created 1614 live and 63 deleted redirects.

  • 614 redirects created since the beginning of 2022
  • 10 of those have since been deleted
    • 4 under G6 rationale
    • 3 under A7 rationale
    • 2 at AfD
    • 1 at RfD
    • 1 under R3 rationale

I'm aware of their AP perm being removed but I don't generally see a problem with the redirects that they create. I don't believe their redirects need to be manually reviewed moving forward. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:09, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done signed, Rosguill talk 17:40, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dogru144

Dogru144 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) Experienced user with over 27k edits who has created 356 live and 16 deleted redirects. No concerns whatsoever after reviewing the deleted redirect reasons (better to just review the log if interested, as it'd very clunky to try to summarize). I don't believe their redirect creations need to be manually reviewed. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:45, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am missing your critique of my edits. What was wrong, and how should I have edited differently in your opinion?Dogru144 (talk) 20:57, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dogru144, I think you're misunderstanding, this nomination was listed because Hey man im josh believes that you are a highly capable redirect-creator with a long track record of unproblematic redirects, and thus that future redirects you create do not need to be reviewed by an NPP editor (and thus reducing the amount of backlog that page reviewers go through). signed, Rosguill talk 21:30, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you User:Rosguill for explaining this. Thank you User:Hey man im josh for the positive assessment.Dogru144 (talk) 21:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Dogru144: Rosguill is absolutely right. I very much appreciate that, when you thought you were being criticized, you asked how you could improve. That's a great attitude and makes me feel even better about my nomination. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Hey man im josh.Dogru144 (talk) 01:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pizzaplayer219

Pizzaplayer219 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) Pizzaplayer219 has created 639 redirects and is fairly active at RfD. Of those, 7 were deleted under the G7 rationale (self requested deletion) and 1 was deleted at RfD. I don't think their redirects need to be manually reviewed. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:51, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Andriyrussu

Andriyrussu (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) Experienced editor with over 26k edits who has created 272 live and 3 deleted redirects. All 3 of those "deleted redirects" show a deletion log pointing towards AfD. Their redirects are largely centered around alternative spellings for Ukrainian people and topics. Not seeing a need to manually review their redirects. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:20, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Iskandar323

Iskandar323 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) Experienced editor with over 25k edits who has created 155 redirects. Of those, 9 were deleted under G6 rationale, 1 at AfD, and 1 under G11 (was made into an article). Not seeing a need to manually patrol their redirects. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:28, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thiscouldbeauser

Thiscouldbeauser (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) Editor with over 9k edits who has 339 live redirects. Of their 13 "deleted redirects", the reasons can be summarized as:

  • 1 under G6 rationale
  • 1 under G10 rationale
  • 1 under R3 rationale
  • 6 at AfD
  • 4 under G8 rationale (target page deleted)

The only thing that caught my attention was the R3 and G10 deletions ("Starfucks" and "Fuck Putin"), but I'm making this nomination with the hope that they've learned from those deletions. I don't believe their redirects need to be manually reviewed. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cavanaughs

Cavanaughs (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) Editor has over 11k edits and has has created 431 live and 17 deleted redirects. Since the start of 2021 they have created 241 redirects, only 5 of which have been deleted (4 under G8 and 1 under G6). Hey man im josh (talk) 20:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AntonioMartin

AntonioMartin (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) Experienced editor over 43k edits who has created 1,039 live and 100 deleted redirects according to Xtools. I know the delete count looks high, but more than half of them are from before 2009 and a lot of the deleted "redirects" on Xtools are looking like they were actually articles.

  • 254 redirects created since the start of 2020
  • 14 of those have since been deleted
    • 1 under R2 rationale
    • 1 under R3 rationale
    • 2 under G6 rationale
    • 4 under G8 rationale
    • 2 under A7 rationale (so no longer redirects)
    • 4 at AfD (so no longer redirects)

Based on just their history since 2020 I don't see a need to manually patrol their redirects. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:30, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hammersoft

Hammersoft (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) Admin with 390 live and 17 deleted redirects. Of the deleted redirects:

  • 11x G6 deletions
  • 1x G7 deletion (appears to have been an article in actuality)
  • 2x G8 deletions
  • 2x deletions as a result of RfD
  • 1x BLP

I don't see a need for the redirects they create to be manually reviewed. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Immanuelle

Immanuelle (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) Experienced user with over 16k edits who has 358 live redirects and 18 deleted pages based on Xtools. Of the deleted pages they've created:

  • 1x G3 deletion
  • 1x G4 deletion (article, not redirect)
  • 3x G6 deletions
  • 4x G7 deletions
  • 6x G8 deletions
  • 2x G14 deletions
  • 1x PROD (article)

I don't believe their redirects need to be manually reviewed moving forward. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removals

Pjesnik21

Please remove Pjesnik21 per Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Redirect autopatrol - Administrators may "remove" users from the "group": ...at the request of the bot operator, who would be responsible for the patrols. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 04:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — JJMC89(T·C) 04:51, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ApprenticeFan

Please remove ApprenticeFan per Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Redirect autopatrol - Administrators may "remove" users from the "group": ...at the request of the bot operator, who would be responsible for the patrols. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 04:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — JJMC89(T·C) 04:51, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RandomCanadian

Please remove RandomCanadian per Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Redirect autopatrol - Administrators may "remove" users from the "group": ...at the request of the bot operator, who would be responsible for the patrols. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 04:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — JJMC89(T·C) 04:51, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LordHood2552

Please remove LordHood2552 per Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Redirect autopatrol - Administrators may "remove" users from the "group": ...at the request of the bot operator, who would be responsible for the patrols. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 04:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — JJMC89(T·C) 04:51, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Users included twice

The following users have changed their name and are included in the list with both their former and current names:

Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 20:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*Treker

*Treker is now known as StarTrekker and has the autopatrolled permission. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 23 April 2022

Please change:

<!-- DannyS712 bot III: whitelist start -->

to:

<!-- DannyS712 bot III: autopatrol list start -->

and:

<!-- DannyS712 bot III: whitelist end -->

to:

<!-- DannyS712 bot III: autopatrol list end -->

Per the closure of the requested move above, to match up with the new terminology. A pull request was opened to updated the code; pinging DannyS712. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 19:40, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do NOT do this edit request (not marking as declined because I'm not an admin so I can't really respond to it) - this should be done at the same time that the bot is updated to change the code and I might not be around for it. Its also unrelated to the requested move above. When I know I'm going to be around, we can figure out how to change this without breaking the bot in the process. DannyS712 (talk) 22:00, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, this should be coordinated carefully with bot code changes. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 22:26, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 On hold deactivated as the immediate edit is not ready, pending when DannS712 can schedule changes - at which time this can be done. — xaosflux Talk 22:31, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]