User talk:B1sdsa10

January 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Deli nk (talk) 14:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 17:17, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

B1sdsa10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I hope this message finds the administrators of Wikipedia well. It has now been three years since my account was blocked indefinitely due to my entry regarding Steph Curry, specifically my opinion regarding his style of play. Prior to that entry, my account had been flagged as a result of my revisions to the ripped jeans, rice pudding, and Buddhism pages. I am now writing to formally request that my account be unblocked as I feel I have matured greatly over the last three years and, more importantly, have learned that my posts, and all posts like them, have a lasting impact on how users view Wikipedia, specifically the damage it does to its reputation as a reputable source of legitimate information.

To begin, even as I was writing my entry about Steph Curry, I knew it was wrong and crossed the line that no Wikipedia user should cross. It was an opinion entry, not a factual entry, that used profane language in an effort to have some fun with Warriors fans at the outset of the 2019 NBA Finals, of which my hometown Toronto Raptors were a part of. My post was clearly an abuse of this site and I agreed with Wikipedia taking down my post, and in light of my previous Wikipedia history, blocking my account. To this post, all I can say is that I apologize for writing it and for using Wikipedia as a sort of sandbox for my own personal humour instead of as the legitimate online encyclopedia it strives to be.

Speaking of my Wikipedia history, as mentioned, my account was previously flagged due to my entries regarding ripped jeans, chocolate milk rice pudding, and Buddhism. In each instance, I agreed with Wikipedia flagging these entries. My main goal with them were to write humorous entries about things that actually did happen to me. To these posts all I can say is that they were self serving and I agree that they did not contribute to Wikipedia’s mission statement. If my account is unblocked, I promise the administrators of Wikipedia that I will not write such posts again. Although my promise may not mean much since it is just words, I would therefore like to invite Wikipedia to permanently remove my account should I post another unhelpful contribution to this site.

I realize that words have meaning. As a result of my previous posts, my own niece used me as an example in her English class of why people should be careful not to rely on everything you read online. If my account is unblocked, I will strive to meaningfully contribute to this online community in order to show that it can be trusted as a legitimate source of information.

Thank you for reviewing my appeal. a

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=''I hope this message finds the administrators of Wikipedia well. It has now been three years since my account was blocked indefinitely due to my entry regarding Steph Curry, specifically my opinion regarding his style of play. Prior to that entry, my account had been flagged as a result of my revisions to the ripped jeans, rice pudding, and Buddhism pages. I am now writing to formally request that my account be unblocked as I feel I have matured greatly over the last three years and, more importantly, have learned that my posts, and all posts like them, have a lasting impact on how users view Wikipedia, specifically the damage it does to its reputation as a reputable source of legitimate information.'' 
:''To begin, even as I was writing my entry about Steph Curry, I knew it was wrong and crossed the line that no Wikipedia user should cross. It was an opinion entry, not a factual entry, that used profane language in an effort to have some fun with Warriors fans at the outset of the 2019 NBA Finals, of which my hometown Toronto Raptors were a part of. My post was clearly an abuse of this site and I agreed with Wikipedia taking down my post, and in light of my previous Wikipedia history, blocking my account. To this post, all I can say is that I apologize for writing it and for using Wikipedia as a sort of sandbox for my own personal humour instead of as the legitimate online encyclopedia it strives to be.''
:''Speaking of my Wikipedia history, as mentioned, my account was previously flagged due to my entries regarding ripped jeans, chocolate milk rice pudding, and Buddhism. In each instance, I agreed with Wikipedia flagging these entries. My main goal with them were to write humorous entries about things that actually did happen to me. To these posts all I can say is that they were self serving and I agree that they did not contribute to Wikipedia’s mission statement. If my account is unblocked, I promise the administrators of Wikipedia that I will not write such posts again. Although my promise may not mean much since it is just words, I would therefore like to invite Wikipedia to permanently remove my account should I post another unhelpful contribution to this site.''
:''I realize that words have meaning. As a result of my previous posts, my own niece used me as an example in her English class of why people should be careful not to rely on everything you read online. If my account is unblocked, I will strive to meaningfully contribute to this online community in order to show that it can be trusted as a legitimate source of information.''
:''Thank you for reviewing my appeal. a'' |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=''I hope this message finds the administrators of Wikipedia well. It has now been three years since my account was blocked indefinitely due to my entry regarding Steph Curry, specifically my opinion regarding his style of play. Prior to that entry, my account had been flagged as a result of my revisions to the ripped jeans, rice pudding, and Buddhism pages. I am now writing to formally request that my account be unblocked as I feel I have matured greatly over the last three years and, more importantly, have learned that my posts, and all posts like them, have a lasting impact on how users view Wikipedia, specifically the damage it does to its reputation as a reputable source of legitimate information.'' 
:''To begin, even as I was writing my entry about Steph Curry, I knew it was wrong and crossed the line that no Wikipedia user should cross. It was an opinion entry, not a factual entry, that used profane language in an effort to have some fun with Warriors fans at the outset of the 2019 NBA Finals, of which my hometown Toronto Raptors were a part of. My post was clearly an abuse of this site and I agreed with Wikipedia taking down my post, and in light of my previous Wikipedia history, blocking my account. To this post, all I can say is that I apologize for writing it and for using Wikipedia as a sort of sandbox for my own personal humour instead of as the legitimate online encyclopedia it strives to be.''
:''Speaking of my Wikipedia history, as mentioned, my account was previously flagged due to my entries regarding ripped jeans, chocolate milk rice pudding, and Buddhism. In each instance, I agreed with Wikipedia flagging these entries. My main goal with them were to write humorous entries about things that actually did happen to me. To these posts all I can say is that they were self serving and I agree that they did not contribute to Wikipedia’s mission statement. If my account is unblocked, I promise the administrators of Wikipedia that I will not write such posts again. Although my promise may not mean much since it is just words, I would therefore like to invite Wikipedia to permanently remove my account should I post another unhelpful contribution to this site.''
:''I realize that words have meaning. As a result of my previous posts, my own niece used me as an example in her English class of why people should be careful not to rely on everything you read online. If my account is unblocked, I will strive to meaningfully contribute to this online community in order to show that it can be trusted as a legitimate source of information.''
:''Thank you for reviewing my appeal. a'' |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=''I hope this message finds the administrators of Wikipedia well. It has now been three years since my account was blocked indefinitely due to my entry regarding Steph Curry, specifically my opinion regarding his style of play. Prior to that entry, my account had been flagged as a result of my revisions to the ripped jeans, rice pudding, and Buddhism pages. I am now writing to formally request that my account be unblocked as I feel I have matured greatly over the last three years and, more importantly, have learned that my posts, and all posts like them, have a lasting impact on how users view Wikipedia, specifically the damage it does to its reputation as a reputable source of legitimate information.'' 
:''To begin, even as I was writing my entry about Steph Curry, I knew it was wrong and crossed the line that no Wikipedia user should cross. It was an opinion entry, not a factual entry, that used profane language in an effort to have some fun with Warriors fans at the outset of the 2019 NBA Finals, of which my hometown Toronto Raptors were a part of. My post was clearly an abuse of this site and I agreed with Wikipedia taking down my post, and in light of my previous Wikipedia history, blocking my account. To this post, all I can say is that I apologize for writing it and for using Wikipedia as a sort of sandbox for my own personal humour instead of as the legitimate online encyclopedia it strives to be.''
:''Speaking of my Wikipedia history, as mentioned, my account was previously flagged due to my entries regarding ripped jeans, chocolate milk rice pudding, and Buddhism. In each instance, I agreed with Wikipedia flagging these entries. My main goal with them were to write humorous entries about things that actually did happen to me. To these posts all I can say is that they were self serving and I agree that they did not contribute to Wikipedia’s mission statement. If my account is unblocked, I promise the administrators of Wikipedia that I will not write such posts again. Although my promise may not mean much since it is just words, I would therefore like to invite Wikipedia to permanently remove my account should I post another unhelpful contribution to this site.''
:''I realize that words have meaning. As a result of my previous posts, my own niece used me as an example in her English class of why people should be careful not to rely on everything you read online. If my account is unblocked, I will strive to meaningfully contribute to this online community in order to show that it can be trusted as a legitimate source of information.''
:''Thank you for reviewing my appeal. a'' |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

B1sdsa10 (talk) 15:29, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bagumba: What say ye? Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:41, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra I have no objection if someone chooses to unblock. —Bagumba (talk) 00:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]