Talk:Revolt of 1173–1174

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. England Start‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. European history Start‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Military history: British / European / Medieval Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  British military history task force European military history task force Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500) Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Middle Ages Start‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Normandy Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Normandy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Normandy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NormandyWikipedia:WikiProject NormandyTemplate:WikiProject NormandyNormandy articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 13, 2005.

A fact from Revolt of 1173–1174 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 September 2004. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the aftermath of the Revolt of 1173-1174 is depicted in the Peter O'Toole-Katharine Hepburn movie The Lion in Winter? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2004/September.

This phase should probably be adjusted: "His mother Eleanor of Aquitaine, who had been feuding with her husband, joined the cause as did many others upset by Henry's murder of Archbishop Thomas Becket in 1170, ".

It is indicated elsewhere that Henry II did not order the murder of Becket, but rather it was a decision taken by the knights themselves. It would probably be more correct to re-phase as: "His mother Eleanor of Aquitaine, who had been feuding with her husband, joined the cause as did many others upset by the murder of Archbishop Thomas Becket in 1170, ".

The request to rename this article to Revolt of 1173–1174 has been carried out. If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag.

Revolt of 1173–74 → Revolt of 1173–1174 – Comply with MOS:DATERANGE. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 07:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 10:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @AllegedlyHuman and Amakuru: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. MOS:DATERANGE permits two-digit years where the range is a pair of consecutive years. The current title is fine, and in line with many other articles.  — Amakuru (talk) 13:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, it looks better and is more accurate with the full year, and although Amakuru is correct that MOS:DATERANGE usually refers to full years when they are not consecutive, full years are preferred and seem encouraged by the language ("Although non-abbreviated years are generally preferred..."). Randy Kryn (talk) 14:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Full years look much better and more encyclopaedic and are preferred, despite the abbreviated form being allowed by DATERANGE. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support for consistency. If the start year is written out in full, the end year should also be. JIP | Talk 15:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Full years look much more accurate. --Edouard2 (talk) 16:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]