Talk:Revolt of 1173–1174
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 13, 2005. |
![]() | A fact from Revolt of 1173–1174 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 September 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Untitled
This phase should probably be adjusted: "His mother Eleanor of Aquitaine, who had been feuding with her husband, joined the cause as did many others upset by Henry's murder of Archbishop Thomas Becket in 1170, ".
It is indicated elsewhere that Henry II did not order the murder of Becket, but rather it was a decision taken by the knights themselves. It would probably be more correct to re-phase as: "His mother Eleanor of Aquitaine, who had been feuding with her husband, joined the cause as did many others upset by the murder of Archbishop Thomas Becket in 1170, ".
Requested move 26 May 2021
![]() | The request to rename this article to Revolt of 1173–1174 has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
Revolt of 1173–74 → Revolt of 1173–1174 – Comply with MOS:DATERANGE. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 07:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. ~ Aseleste
(t, e | c, l) 10:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- @AllegedlyHuman and Amakuru: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. MOS:DATERANGE permits two-digit years where the range is a pair of consecutive years. The current title is fine, and in line with many other articles. — Amakuru (talk) 13:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support, it looks better and is more accurate with the full year, and although Amakuru is correct that MOS:DATERANGE usually refers to full years when they are not consecutive, full years are preferred and seem encouraged by the language ("Although non-abbreviated years are generally preferred..."). Randy Kryn (talk) 14:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Support. Full years look much better and more encyclopaedic and are preferred, despite the abbreviated form being allowed by DATERANGE. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Support for consistency. If the start year is written out in full, the end year should also be. JIP | Talk 15:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Support. Full years look much more accurate. --Edouard2 (talk) 16:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)