Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect autopatrol list

This page is for requesting access to the redirect autopatrol pseudoright. If you wish to discuss this list, its requirements, or NPP in general, please do so at the NPP discussion page.

The criteria for this pseudoright is an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects.

For a request to be considered successful it must have been open for at least 24 hours with the consensus of at least 3 editors who possess the new page reviewer permission (which includes all administrators). After two weeks, if a request does not have the individual consensus of 3 reviewers the request will be automatically closed. Alternatively an administrator may close a request as successful or unsuccessful at any time as part of standard individual administrative discretion for the granting of user rights.

Closed requests will be archived to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist/Old requests after a minimum of three calendar days^[a] following the close of the discussion.

Notes

Benwing

Benwing (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs ^{(block • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi)

378 redirects. Seems no problem. Thank you.--PATH SLOPU 09:27, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill can I suggest allowing more time for other comments as this page was designed for? DannyS712 (talk) 03:42, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DannyS712, my bad, I was treating this the same as a permissions request. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 04:11, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill this was designed to be different from normal permissions requests, specifically to allow engagement from other reviewers - while admins can (and you do) add users unilaterally, for requests that are made here on the talk page I would appreciate being allowed to chime in, and I assume others would as well DannyS712 (talk) 04:40, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shushugah

Shushugah (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs ^{(block • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi)

• ~31 total redirects created (that still exist, according to user contributions) seems a little on the low side, especially since I see only 3 in the last three months. I don't think this warrants whitelisting --DannyS712 (talk) 08:13, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not disagree perse. What's the guideline/ball park? Is there a specific harm if a redirect is not reviewed, beyond not showing up in Google SEO? I appreciate whatever time you take to reply. ~ Shushugah (talk) 08:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Shushugah redirects are generally reviewed by humans, this list is just used to simplify the workload of new page reviewers by telling the bot to review some. I don't know if we have a specific guideline number though DannyS712 (talk) 11:11, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

•  Not done, cordially, my general rule of thumb is >100 redirects with almost no errors. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Александр Мотин

Please remove Александр Мотин per Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Redirect autopatrol - Administrators may "remove" users from the "group": ...at the request of the bot operator, who would be responsible for the patrols. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 02:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maxie the Fox

Please remove Maxie the Fox per Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Redirect autopatrol - Administrators may "remove" users from the "group": ...at the request of the bot operator, who would be responsible for the patrols. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 02:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]