Paraceratherium: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

11 August 2024

5 July 2024

30 June 2024

17 June 2024

16 June 2024

6 June 2024

4 January 2024

11 December 2023

28 November 2023

5 October 2023

17 September 2023

14 August 2023

23 July 2023

5 June 2023

29 May 2023

23 May 2023

11 April 2023

9 April 2023

  • curprev 05:2605:26, 9 April 2023AnomieBOT talk contribsm 63,197 bytes +16 Dating maintenance tags: {{Disputed section}} undo
  • curprev 03:2603:26, 9 April 2023PrimalMustelid talk contribs 63,181 bytes +21 While I couldn't find specific extinction causes of Paraceratherium, it definitely did not go extinct from the Proboscidean datum event considering that event occurred 19-18 Ma (or "MM3" (Mammal Neogene Zone)), long after its extinction, and Prodeinotherium was the first to do so, not Gomphotherium. In fact, according to "An Oligocene giant rhino provides insights into Paraceratherium evolution," the Paraceratheriidae was extinct by the Oligocene-Miocene transition. undo
  • curprev 02:5802:58, 9 April 2023FunkMonk talk contribs 63,160 bytes −1 Sounds good, though here it probably shouldn't be plural. undo
  • curprev 02:5002:50, 9 April 2023PrimalMustelid talk contribsm 63,161 bytes +12 To call them "rhinoceros" is somewhat misleading considering Paraceratherium is of the Paraceriidae family. It's within the Rhinocerotoidea superfamily, so it would be more appropriate to call them "paraceratheres" or "rhinocerotoids," especially since it's different from true rhinos like Trigonias of the Eocene. undo

23 March 2023

19 March 2023

13 March 2023

4 March 2023

17 February 2023

21 December 2022

18 October 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)