In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida (album): Revision history

23 June 2024

• curprev 11:3011:30, 23 June 2024‎ MusikBot II talk contribs‎ m 13,403 bytes +17‎ Adding missing protection template (more info)
• curprev 09:0909:09, 23 June 2024‎ Materialscientist talk contribs‎ m 13,386 bytes 0‎ Protected "In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida (album)": Persistent disruptive editing ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 09:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)) [Move=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 09:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)))
• curprev 09:0709:07, 23 June 2024‎ Materialscientist talk contribs‎ m 13,386 bytes +4,951‎ Reverted edits by 2603:900A:1102:FE4E:ACD2:1072:D455:AA1C (talk) (HG) (3.4.12) Tags: Huggle Rollback
• curprev 09:0709:07, 23 June 2024‎ 2603:900a:1102:fe4e:acd2:1072:d455:aa1c talk‎ 8,435 bytes −268‎ Your references were incorrect Tags: Reverted categories removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 09:0609:06, 23 June 2024‎ 2603:900a:1102:fe4e:acd2:1072:d455:aa1c talk‎ 8,703 bytes −4,683‎ The album did not sell 30 million copies. I checked their sources. None of them were credible. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 09:0309:03, 23 June 2024‎ Materialscientist talk contribs‎ m 13,386 bytes +3,562‎ Reverted edits by 2603:900A:1102:FE4E:ACD2:1072:D455:AA1C (talk): original research (HG) (3.4.12) Tags: Huggle Rollback
• curprev 09:0309:03, 23 June 2024‎ 2603:900a:1102:fe4e:acd2:1072:d455:aa1c talk‎ 9,824 bytes −3,562‎ removed the lies. None of this article had any truth Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 09:0009:00, 23 June 2024‎ Materialscientist talk contribs‎ m 13,386 bytes +4,055‎ Reverted edits by 2603:900A:1102:FE4E:ACD2:1072:D455:AA1C (talk): original research (HG) (3.4.12) Tags: Huggle Rollback
• curprev 09:0009:00, 23 June 2024‎ 2603:900a:1102:fe4e:acd2:1072:d455:aa1c talk‎ 9,331 bytes −4,055‎ The album did not sell 30 million copies. That is comeplrely false. Its chart positions and sales numbers are listed in the ands discography page. And it did NOT sell 30 million. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 08:5608:56, 23 June 2024‎ Materialscientist talk contribs‎ m 13,386 bytes +4,460‎ Reverted edits by 2603:900A:1102:FE4E:ACD2:1072:D455:AA1C (talk) (HG) (3.4.12) Tags: Huggle Rollback
• curprev 08:5108:51, 23 June 2024‎ 2603:900a:1102:fe4e:acd2:1072:d455:aa1c talk‎ 8,926 bytes −4,460‎ Wikipedia seems to believe this album sold 30 million copies which is not true. Wikipedia seems to believe this was best selling album in history upon release. Thats is not true. Wikipedia seems to be love that this was the best selling album Atlantic ever released. Which is not true. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 04:1004:10, 23 June 2024‎ Wiiformii talk contribs‎ m 13,386 bytes +4,797‎ Reverted edits by 47.227.82.255 (talk) (AV) Tags: AntiVandal Rollback
• curprev 04:0804:08, 23 June 2024‎ 47.227.82.255 talk‎ 8,589 bytes −4,797‎ Almost eveything was wrong. This article had some of the most ridiculous claims. This album did no sell 30 million copies. It did not outsell EVERY ALBUM EVER RECORDED. (🤣). It was never the best selling album in Atlantic’s catalogue (Led Zeppelin was on Atlantic . Lmao). It did not sell 8 million in its fist year Nor was it the best selling album of 1968. Eveything was completely false and totally ridiculous. Obviously the publicist for this band keeps adding it in. And I’ll contin... Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 04:0204:02, 23 June 2024‎ Wiiformii talk contribs‎ m 13,386 bytes +4,557‎ Reverted edits by 47.227.82.255 (talk) (AV) Tags: AntiVandal Rollback
• curprev 04:0104:01, 23 June 2024‎ 47.227.82.255 talk‎ 8,829 bytes −4,557‎ Almost eveything was wrong. This article had some of the most ridiculous claims. This album did no sell 30 million copies. It did not outsell EVERY ALBUM EVER RECORDED. (🤣). It was never the best selling album in Atlantic’s catalogue (Led Zeppelin was on Atlantic . Lmao). It did not sell 8 million in its fist year Nor was it the best selling album of 1968. Eveything was completely false and totally ridiculous. Obviously the publicist for this band keeps adding it in. And I’ll contin... Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

22 June 2024

• curprev 20:1720:17, 22 June 2024‎ 197.87.135.139 talk‎ 13,386 bytes +2,186‎ No edit summary Tag: Manual revert

20 June 2024

• curprev 09:0509:05, 20 June 2024‎ AnomieBOT talk contribs‎ 11,200 bytes +2,498‎ Rescuing orphaned refs ("Billboard 200" from rev 1227848069; "sales" from rev 1227848069; "billboard.com" from rev 1227848069) Tag: Reverted
• curprev 06:5906:59, 20 June 2024‎ 47.227.82.255 talk‎ 8,702 bytes −4,684‎ Where are you getting the idea it’s sold 30 million copies? That isn’t true at all. Check the bestcseeling slbum all time list that on this site. It’s not there. Check the RIAA certified album sales. It’s not there. That content was completely false and misleading. It is been removed. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

8 June 2024

• curprev 03:4403:44, 8 June 2024‎ FlightTime talk contribs‎ 13,386 bytes +4,224‎ Undid revision 1227846527 by 2603:900A:1102:FE4E:BC8F:7A01:67E7:A0C (talk) Tag: Undo
• curprev 03:2803:28, 8 June 2024‎ 2603:900a:1102:fe4e:bc8f:7a01:67e7:a0c talk‎ 9,162 bytes −4,224‎ It was not the best selling album of 1969. It DID NOT outsell EVERY album they had ever been released. That’s one of the most absurd claims I have ever seen. It did NOT sell 30 million copies. Check any list of best selling albums. It’s no on there. Michael Jackson’s thriller is the best selling album at 50 million. Ac/dc back in black at 40 million. Followed by Whitney Houston and the eagles both at around 30-35 million. Iron butterfly is NOWHERE ON THAT LIST. Where were you are gett... Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

7 June 2024

• curprev 20:4220:42, 7 June 2024‎ Shazback talk contribs‎ 13,386 bytes +4,302‎ Reverted good faith edits by 2603:900A:1102:FE4E:7CEC:C472:358F:E9E6 (talk): Unclear why blanked / removal of text with multiple independent sources - please provide contradicting sources or take to talk page to discuss Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 20:2720:27, 7 June 2024‎ 2603:900a:1102:fe4e:7cec:c472:358f:e9e6 talk‎ 9,084 bytes −4,302‎ It did NOT sell 30 Million copies. It was NOT the best Serling album in music history at the time (lmaoooooo). It was NOT the best selling album in 1969. It was NOT the best seeling album on Atlantic. Eveything you had in this was completely wrong. Everything. I’ve removed it numerous time yet you insist on our it back in. It’s NOT TRUE!!!! NONE OF THAt IS TRUE! STOP HAVING BULLSHIT IN YOUR ARTICLES. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

5 June 2024

• curprev 06:2306:23, 5 June 2024‎ 197.87.135.139 talk‎ 13,386 bytes +4,303‎ Rv back to last good version Tag: Manual revert
• curprev 06:0506:05, 5 June 2024‎ 2603:900a:1102:fe4e:d856:a8fb:5458:d827 talk‎ 9,083 bytes −440‎ No edit summary Tags: Reverted references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 06:0306:03, 5 June 2024‎ 2603:900a:1102:fe4e:d856:a8fb:5458:d827 talk‎ 9,523 bytes −3,863‎ Removed the same bullshit as last time. It did not outsell every album ever recorded. lol. Look at any list of most copies of albums sold. It’s nowhere on there. It’s not true and I will take out again. And again. And again. An again. So stop putting it back. It’s not true. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

4 June 2024

• curprev 11:4311:43, 4 June 2024‎ 197.87.135.139 talk‎ 13,386 bytes +956‎ rv persistent vandalism from serial troll Tag: Manual revert

2 June 2024

• curprev 13:1413:14, 2 June 2024‎ AnomieBOT talk contribs‎ 12,430 bytes +2,282‎ Rescuing orphaned refs ("billboard.com" from rev 1226842308; "sales" from rev 1226842308) Tag: Reverted
• curprev 11:1011:10, 2 June 2024‎ 2603:900a:1102:fe4e:ed30:4bc9:4879:9e38 talk‎ 10,148 bytes −3,238‎ Removed content that was not true. It did NOT sell 8 million copies in irs first year. It did NOT sell 30 million copies. None of that is true. Look up the list of best selling albums of Alll time. This album is not on there. Almsot everything in this article was false. The only truth was that it was certified platinum 4 times in the USA. The rest is false and was removed. And will continue to be removed. Look up “best selling sinks of all time”. You’ll even find Wikipedia article Abou... Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 04:4904:49, 2 June 2024‎ Augmented Seventh talk contribs‎ 13,386 bytes +4,611‎ restoring sourced for Ron Bushy Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 04:4804:48, 2 June 2024‎ 2603:900a:1102:fe4e:4097:5600:ba6d:4bf8 talk‎ 8,775 bytes −4,611‎ Removed false content. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

29 May 2024

• curprev 19:0519:05, 29 May 2024‎ Swinub talk contribs‎ 13,386 bytes −13‎ Trying this again
• curprev 04:0504:05, 29 May 2024‎ MuzikJunky talk contribs‎ 13,399 bytes −14‎ No edit summary

27 May 2024

• curprev 01:3801:38, 27 May 2024‎ AMCKen talk contribs‎ 13,413 bytes −6‎ checked chart info - 91 weeks. :)

26 May 2024

• curprev 20:0920:09, 26 May 2024‎ AMCKen talk contribs‎ 13,419 bytes +373‎ added Canadian info with cites
• curprev 20:0420:04, 26 May 2024‎ AMCKen talk contribs‎ 13,046 bytes +615‎ →‎Charts: added Canadian ranking with cites. It was #8 4 separate times

25 May 2024

• curprev 22:4422:44, 25 May 2024‎ Adam Black talk contribs‎ 12,431 bytes +2,653‎ Reverting edit(s) by 2600:8801:7116:4400:4DFB:719E:68B1:448 (talk) to rev. 1218247990 by 8086-PC: Claims "all unverifiable information" but has removed multiple citations with archive links. (UV 0.1.5) Tags: Ultraviolet Undo
• curprev 22:4022:40, 25 May 2024‎ 2600:8801:7116:4400:4dfb:719e:68b1:448 talk‎ 9,778 bytes −2,653‎ All unverifiable information, as firmly established several times already Tags: Reverted references removed

10 April 2024

• curprev 16:1716:17, 10 April 2024‎ 8086-PC talk contribs‎ 12,431 bytes +8‎ →‎Certifications

7 April 2024

• curprev 15:4215:42, 7 April 2024‎ 197.83.246.171 talk‎ 12,423 bytes +18‎ →‎Certifications

24 March 2024

• curprev 07:0907:09, 24 March 2024‎ 197.87.63.243 talk‎ 12,405 bytes +1,992‎ Undid revision 1215293904 by Dhoffryn (talk)That's WP:OR and WP:POV on your part. Wiki hoes with WP:RS Tag: Undo
• curprev 07:0707:07, 24 March 2024‎ Dhoffryn talk contribs‎ 10,413 bytes −1,992‎ Undid revision 1215282745 by 197.87.63.243 (talk) it barely has 5 million in certifications. Just adding additional 25 million is how far these claims can get. Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 05:0305:03, 24 March 2024‎ 197.87.63.243 talk‎ 12,405 bytes +1,992‎ Undid revision 1215253384 by Dhoffryn (talk)rv unexplained blanking of reliably sourced material Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 00:3600:36, 24 March 2024‎ Dhoffryn talk contribs‎ 10,413 bytes −1,992‎ inflated (it does not even have 5 million in certs/sales) Tag: Reverted

22 March 2024

• curprev 14:5814:58, 22 March 2024‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 12,405 bytes +18‎ Altered template type. Added magazine. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Jay8g | #UCB_toolbar

21 March 2024

• curprev 13:5813:58, 21 March 2024‎ 197.89.10.188 talk‎ 12,387 bytes +39‎ →‎Certifications
• curprev 13:5713:57, 21 March 2024‎ 197.89.10.188 talk‎ 12,348 bytes 0‎ →‎Certifications
• curprev 13:5613:56, 21 March 2024‎ 197.89.10.188 talk‎ 12,348 bytes +2‎ →‎Certifications
• curprev 13:4513:45, 21 March 2024‎ 197.89.10.188 talk‎ 12,346 bytes +329‎ →‎Certifications

16 March 2024

• curprev 04:2104:21, 16 March 2024‎ 197.87.143.112 talk‎ 12,017 bytes +17‎ Undid revision 1213947854 by Swinub (talk) Tag: Undo
• curprev 02:2102:21, 16 March 2024‎ Swinub talk contribs‎ 12,000 bytes −17‎ Undid revision 1213454399 by 197.87.63.86 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted