Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazran conflict (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Content deleted Content added
Simba16 (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 41: Line 41:
* '''Delete'''. Inaccurate information.--[[User:Takhirgeran Umar|Takhirgeran Umar]] ([[User talk:Takhirgeran Umar|talk]]) 08:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
* '''Delete'''. Inaccurate information.--[[User:Takhirgeran Umar|Takhirgeran Umar]] ([[User talk:Takhirgeran Umar|talk]]) 08:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
* '''Delete'''. No reliable sources. --[[User:Simba16|Simba16]] ([[User talk:Simba16|talk]]) 17:48, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
* '''Delete'''. No reliable sources. --[[User:Simba16|Simba16]] ([[User talk:Simba16|talk]]) 17:48, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
* '''Delete'''. The Ingush are known in Russia as falsifiers of history, and their false articles are not allowed in the Russian-language Wikipedia. So they moved here and started spreading their lies. It is necessary to remove these false articles here as well. [[User:Таллархо|Таллархо]] ([[User talk:Таллархо|talk]]) 04:14, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:14, 4 February 2023

Nazran conflict (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is very flawed, it is solely based on 1 story from a man who is biased, wasn't there and contradicts history even according to the source, please check the talk page for more info, the last section is enough to understand the problem Goddard2000 (talk) 16:23, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is how the battle is described in Ingush folklore. Historical Russian sources contradict the folklore and describe the incident as following:



Chronology — Butkov P. G. Materials for the new history of the Caucasus, from 1722 to 1803. - SPb., 1869. Volume 3. page 171.

Here are the details of the battle from the Author. — Butkov P. G. Materials for the new history of the Caucasus, from 1722 to 1803. - SPb., 1869. Volume 2. page. 111 --Товболатов (talk) 18:43, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Товболатов , WikiEditor1234567123 We obviously disagree with each other and we have talked 100 times in talk pages, let the admins decide now, if they want us to make our case again in here then we'll do it. It's better if we don't debate in here now. Goddard2000 (talk) 19:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i don't understand why this article hasn't been deleted yet. I recommend reading the talk page, this whole article is based on the words of 1 single man from the Dalgat source. 1 man who was not present during the battle (he claims it happened 200 years ago), he contradicts history which is confirmed by the author that records this story from him, he is biased as he is Ingush and aggrandizes the history of his hero, the story is not corroborated in Russian military records or any other source from that period. Why should we allow wikipedia articles to be made on the words of 1 man? this is not a credible source, especially not since this article tries to aggrandize Ingush history against 3 of their neighbors. This article is too biased. Please read the talk page in the Nazran conflict page. Goddard2000 (talk) 10:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merjuev Salovdi (talk) 09:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]