Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sfj340sfeoem71: Difference between revisions

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Content deleted Content added
m →‎02 October 2019: Add quotes
IMme4u09 (talk | contribs)
Line 41: Line 41:
# {{u|Clickerbate342}} removed information on Andrews's resignation from the lead section at [[Special:Diff/916751014]].
# {{u|Clickerbate342}} removed information on Andrews's resignation from the lead section at [[Special:Diff/916751014]].
# {{u|Cartonfixture9}} removed information on Andrews's resignation from the lead section at [[Special:Diff/916786697]] and [[Special:Diff/916820569]].
# {{u|Cartonfixture9}} removed information on Andrews's resignation from the lead section at [[Special:Diff/916786697]] and [[Special:Diff/916820569]].
# {{u|IMme4u09}} removed information on Andrews's resignation from the lead section at [[Special:Diff/918085868]].
# {{u|IMme4u09}} ''moved'' information on Andrews's resignation from the lead section at [[Special:Diff/918085868]].


Requesting CheckUser due to extensive abuse. —&nbsp;'''''[[User:Newslinger|<span style="color:#536267;">Newslinger</span>]]'''&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Newslinger#top|<span style="color:#708090;">talk</span>]]</small>'' 09:04, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Requesting CheckUser due to extensive abuse. —&nbsp;'''''[[User:Newslinger|<span style="color:#536267;">Newslinger</span>]]'''&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Newslinger#top|<span style="color:#708090;">talk</span>]]</small>'' 09:04, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:00, 2 October 2019

Sfj340sfeoem71

Sfj340sfeoem71 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed


02 October 2019

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets


All of the suspected sockpuppets, along with suspected sockmaster Sfj340sfeoem71 and confirmed sockpuppet Sbaker467, have engaged in a coordinated whitewashing campaign of the Rob Andrews article. Most of the suspected sockpuppets follow a similar username pattern, and are single-purpose accounts that repeatedly whitewash or remove content related to Andrews's resignation (for alleged misuse of funds) in the Rob Andrews article.

  1. Fightlibel removed content from the article's Controversies section in Special:Diff/787193376. The account was already blocked by Materialscientist with a comment referencing confirmed sockpuppet Sbaker467, although the user page was not tagged or added to Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Sfj340sfeoem71.
  2. Christiantaylormayor whitewashed the article's Controversies section in Special:Diff/787687981. The account was already blocked by DoRD for sockpuppetry on the Rob Andrews article, but was not explicitly linked to Sfj340sfeoem71 during the block.
  3. Sbade123 whitewashed the article's Tenure section in Special:Diff/879525518, removing content including a mention of Andrews's support for the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and replacing the removed content with promotional platitudes such as 'Andrews is most known as doing what was “right for the people while doing financially right for the country."' The edit used a misleading edit summary, "Fixed grammar and replaced expired cite."
  4. Broncos745 made two perplexing edits, Special:Diff/879578324 and Special:Diff/879578463, possibly as a distraction tactic. The edits used misleading edit summaries, "Deleted duplicate sentences, added source." and "Fixed duplication". The tactic may have worked, as Velella ended up reverting Broncos745's edits in Special:Diff/879578740, but did not address Sbade123's prior edits.
  5. Tissoucow13 removed the article's Controversies section in Special:Diff/879580830. The edit used a misleading edit summary, "removed duplicate sentences. added source.
  6. Flowerpower12321 added promotional content in Special:Diff/879584726 that fails verification to the cited press release.
  7. Wadebryan34 added a promotional claim, "Andrews is the only Democrat who pledged he would not raise taxes", to the article's Voting History section which describes Andrews in general. This claim was sourced from an article that stated "Mr. Andrews is the only Democratic candidate to pledge that he will not raise taxes" in the context of a single election.
  8. Pekkingduck34's edit (Special:Diff/881599053) isn't too bad, but the account follows a similar username pattern and its only edit was to the Rob Andrews article.
  9. Sbaker143 removed information on Andrews's resignation from the lead section at Special:Diff/916496569. The edit used a misleading edit summary, "removed broken link and deleted a duplicate sentence." The account name is a close match to confirmed sockpuppet Sbaker467.
  10. Sterlinglayla123's edits aren't too bad, but the account follows a similar username pattern and all 4 of its edits were to the Rob Andrews article.
  11. Sballi345hg removed information on Andrews's resignation from the lead section at Special:Diff/916620325. The edit used a misleading edit summary, "removed vandalism. reverted back to last approved page".
  12. Clickerbate342 removed information on Andrews's resignation from the lead section at Special:Diff/916751014.
  13. Cartonfixture9 removed information on Andrews's resignation from the lead section at Special:Diff/916786697 and Special:Diff/916820569.
  14. IMme4u09 moved information on Andrews's resignation from the lead section at Special:Diff/918085868.

Requesting CheckUser due to extensive abuse. — Newslinger talk 09:04, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments