User talk:Lepidoptera~plwiki: Difference between revisions

Hello, Lepidoptera~plwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Garden carpet, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

• Policy on neutral point of view
• Guideline on spam
• Guideline on external links
• Guideline on conflict of interest
• FAQ for Organizations

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:55, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

could you maybe upload your wonderful images to Wikimedia Commons instead, so that they could be used in articles? See Commons:First_steps on Wikimedia Commons.

Just adding a link to your website to as many articles as possible does not appear to be a good idea to me. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:04, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments - unfortunately I don't agree with you that my editions are some kind of advertising. Lepidoptera Mundi is the largest website related with butterflies and moths, it works a little bit like a Wikipedia allows users to add own images or information. The problem is that the links structure has been changed and most part of the existing links are wrong and has to be corrected. External link section on Wikipedia gave users a possibility to get more information about the selected subject. From my particular point of view - it's a valuable information and you shouldn't remove it. Also I would like to take your attention that part of my editions just make an alphabetical order with external links. It's much easier to find information if it's sorted. I've spent a lot of time trying to add some good (in my opionion) links - if you are going to remove/disable them - please let me know. I won't to waste my time anymore... And regarding to images - yes, I should do that but I still don't have enough time to do everything what I should ;-) I'm working in two companies in the same time and I've very limited resources for any other tasks.....

Lepidoptera, why is your username exactly the same as the domain to the website that you're adding links to in a bunch of articles? Is this your website? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you adding an external link to numerous amounts of articles and with a domain that matches your username? I assume that this is your website? This mass addition of that domain both quantifies original research as well as conflict of interest and these edits need to stop and your changes need to be removed...... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:16, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]