User talk:Hayman30: Difference between revisions

Template:Archive box collapsable

That IP editor/Hadji87 does not seem to be getting the fact that the article has virtually no worthwhile information besides peaks and fails WP:NSONGS; they appear to have restored Did You See. Ss112 17:31, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: I don't feel like edit warring over this, especially after looking at their edit summary. Hayman30 (talk) 02:52, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can Eranwiki (talk) 10:37, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I'd already decided to amend the writing, more educationally explanatory for anyone who doesn't realise that 'to take a wife' in old testament language actually = just sex, sometimes rape - rather than what we might now think of, some kind've ceremony, all happy consensual. In translation the original Bible meanings have been lost or altered which denies a modern student the full picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmyMoosey (talk • contribs) 11:08, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Butler Dispatch. I do not think that Butler Dispatch fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because "one of the largest online news sources for several large television networks." is a claim of significance and there are other claims present as well.. I request that you consider not re-tagging Butler Dispatch for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 13:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DESiegel: I don't think that'd be a credible claim with their own website and Facebook pages as sources, especially with the COI editor. Hayman30 (talk) 13:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please re-read WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CCS. A claim of significance need not be supported by any sources at all. The sourcing does not matter for purposes of A7. If a search might find sources supporting such a claim, that is good enough, even if the article is totally without cited sources. Please do not tag for A7 based on the quality of sources in future. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 13:28, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CSD#G1 (Patent nonsense) specifies pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. It does not cover poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, implausible theories, vandalism or hoaxes, fictional material, coherent non-English material, or poorly translated material. ... In short, if you can understand it, G1 does not apply. This page may be about a non-notable person. It may be unencylopedic. Perhaps it should be deleted via AfD or PROD. But it is not G1 Patent Nonsense, and it should not be blanked as such. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 15:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DESiegel: I didn't refer to G1, I simply said that those paragraphs are nonsense. I doubt that those duplicated paragraphs about Lorem Ipsum are meaningful, or related to the topic at all, they're clearly a placeholder. That's why I don't see anything wrong with my blanking of those sections. And I can't believe that you literally reverted through two of my edits without actually looking at what I did with the first one. Hayman30 (talk) 15:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As I read the article, it is describing the use of Lorem Ipsum as a technique in mocking up web pages. That is not a mere placeholder. I apologize for reverting your perfectly valid correction of the level 1 header -- that was an error on my part. Thank you for reinstating it. I still don't think blanking is helpful in this case, but perhaps there is a case to be made for it. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 15:41, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor found that the whole thing was a copyvio (which i didn't really expect) sand I have deleted it as such. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 15:47, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hayman30, regarding [1]: I'm totally with you. But I had to change it 4 times now because someone keeps adding and pretend that PHI is invited and participating. Which is not the case. Therfore I was a bit "screaming" in the comments ;) Have a nice day --Flor!an (talk) 16:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Hayman30, noticed a lot of Snoop Dogg single covers are too short or wide (one example is for Snoop's Upside Ya Head, but one of many). Also: can you get covers for Life of da Party, Murder Was the Case (song) (remix), New York, New York (Tha Dogg Pound song), 2 of Amerikaz Most Wanted, Wrong Idea, Mission Cleopatra (song), Do U Wanna Roll (Dolittle Theme) and Wiggle (song) please? Appreciate if you can, because you did a great job uploading art for "Disconnect" - Clean Bandit.--Theo Mandela (talk) 23:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I have a question. I just looked at the iPhone 7 article, and noticed that in the wikitext, the photo for "Comparison of ports" is located in the Hardware section, but in the actual article, it is located in the Issues section, along with every other photo. Is this just an issue with my screen or are you noticing this too? LocalNet (talk) 07:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you actually know Lysvincent in real life? An editor claiming to be Lysvincent is saying you know him and that they "told [you] everything". I don't particularly care to respond there because that long rant isn't going to convince anybody or help them get unblocked, but I just thought I'd ask. Ss112 10:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also was just thinking that if you know them in real life, you might ask them to stop editing with IPs or just in general—it's not helping their case, as Yamla blocked that IP for block evasion as well. Ss112 08:05, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: He is my classmate as he claimed. Just gonna clear things up by the way, I'm not affiliated with him nor sharing the account with him. He did told me that he's not JustofiedT147AG, but it's pretty hard to believe with all those similarities flying around and his admission of using No Mono. Hayman30 (talk) 12:46, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Hello, I'm Hayman30. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Peg Entwistle— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 05:36, 13 July 2017 (UTC)"[reply]

The edit was completely relevant and constructive. If an artist refutes a purported inspiration for a work, it should be referenced to. Otherwise the statement is misleading by omission. Please revert back my edit. 124.190.67.188 (talk) 05:49, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was ib the middle of an edit, and on mobile I can't simply edit the whole page. --1.55.183.244 (talk) 06:47, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Next time read the reason I give, don't just revert an edit, I had to first move things in the main body before I could edit. --1.55.183.244 (talk) 06:49, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--1.55.183.244 (talk) 06:49, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]