Amphibious Combat Vehicle: Difference between revisions

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Content deleted Content added
→‎History: clean up, typos fixed: aquisition → acquisition using AWB
→‎History: rfp in 2014
Line 60: Line 60:
A [[request for information]] (RFI) was issued to industry on 17 February 2011. The document outlined expected requirements and asked industry for informal design proposals and program methodology feedback. Responses were due by 22 April 2011.<ref name=RFI_solicitation/> An industry day was held on 6 April 2011.
A [[request for information]] (RFI) was issued to industry on 17 February 2011. The document outlined expected requirements and asked industry for informal design proposals and program methodology feedback. Responses were due by 22 April 2011.<ref name=RFI_solicitation/> An industry day was held on 6 April 2011.


In August 2012, [[General Dynamics]] was awarded an ACV Hull Survivability Demonstrator contract for the design, fabrication, and test support of a full-scale hull to demonstrate crew-protection technologies. In November 2012, they conducted simulated mine-blast tests on their ACV ballistic hull design, successfully meeting mine-blast survivability requirements. Work will conclude by May 2013 and will be used to refine requirements for effective protection against under-vehicle threats.<ref>[http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/general-dynamics-amphibious-combat-vehicle-hull-design-meets-marine-corps-survivability-requirement-177255731.html General Dynamics Amphibious Combat Vehicle Hull Design Meets Marine Corps' Survivability Requirement] - Prnewswire.com, 5 November 2012.</ref>
In August 2012, [[General Dynamics]] was awarded an ACV Hull Survivability Demonstrator contract for the design, fabrication, and test support of a full-scale hull to demonstrate crew-protection technologies. In November 2012, they conducted simulated mine-blast tests on their ACV ballistic hull design, successfully meeting mine-blast survivability requirements. Work concluded by May 2013 and will be used to refine requirements for effective protection against under-vehicle threats.<ref>[http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/general-dynamics-amphibious-combat-vehicle-hull-design-meets-marine-corps-survivability-requirement-177255731.html General Dynamics Amphibious Combat Vehicle Hull Design Meets Marine Corps' Survivability Requirement] - Prnewswire.com, 5 November 2012.</ref>


In April 2013, [[DARPA]] awarded a $1 million prize to a team in the [[Adaptive Vehicle Make#Fast Adaptable Next-Generation Ground Vehicle|Fast Adaptable Next-Generation Ground Vehicle (FANG)]] contest. The team beat out 1,000 other competitors to submit their design for a drivetrain for the Amphibious Combat Vehicle. The FANG initiative is to demonstrate a way to procure working systems better than the current defense acquisition process, which frequently leads to delays and cost overruns. The Marines are in charge of the ACV program, so there is no guarantee that the Darpa-crowdsourced mobility drivetrain will result in a vehicle bought by the Corps.<ref>[http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/04/darpa-fang-winner/ This Is the Million-Dollar Design for Darpa’s Crowdsourced Swimming Tank] - Wired.com, April 22, 2013</ref>
In April 2013, [[DARPA]] awarded a $1 million prize to a team in the [[Adaptive Vehicle Make#Fast Adaptable Next-Generation Ground Vehicle|Fast Adaptable Next-Generation Ground Vehicle (FANG)]] contest. The team beat out 1,000 other competitors to submit their design for a drivetrain for the Amphibious Combat Vehicle. The FANG initiative is to demonstrate a way to procure working systems better than the current defense acquisition process, which frequently leads to delays and cost overruns. The Marines are in charge of the ACV program, so there is no guarantee that the Darpa-crowdsourced mobility drivetrain will result in a vehicle bought by the Corps.<ref>[http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/04/darpa-fang-winner/ This Is the Million-Dollar Design for Darpa’s Crowdsourced Swimming Tank] - Wired.com, April 22, 2013</ref>

At a roundtable discussion on 26 June 2013, Marine Corps General [[Jim Amos]] told the media that the program was still being pursued, and that a [[request for proposals]] (RFP) would be issued in early 2014. The Corps has secured and saved a “moderate amount” of money for early development. With the previous Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle cancelled from cost overruns, the Marines are being cautious to identify trade-offs between requirements and cost for the platform. Amos noted that they were working with contractors to see which type of vehicle would meet requirements without proving too costly.<ref>[http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/awx_06_26_2013_p0-591775.xml RFP For Marine Corps ACV Expected In 2014] - Aviationweek.com, 26 June 2013</ref>


== Variants ==
== Variants ==

Revision as of 15:42, 28 June 2013

Template:Distinguish2

Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV)
TypeAmphibious assault vehicle
Place of originUnited States

The Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) is a program initiated by Marine Corps Systems Command to procure an amphibious assault vehicle for the United States Marine Corps to replace the Assault Amphibious Vehicle. The program replaces the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle program canceled in 2011.

Design requirements

The ACV should have countermeasures able to contend with a full range of direct fire, indirect fire, and land mine threats. Visible and thermal signature reduction technologies will also be utilized. Modular protection can be applied as necessary.[1]

The vehicle must have the capability to transition from water to ground operations without tactical pause. It must be able to maneuver with the M1A1 Abrams in a mechanized task force. It must have the capability to destroy combat vehicles similar to itself. Weapons must have sufficient range to engage targets from a standoff distance. Weapons will apply precision fire from a stabilized system. It must provide direct fire support for dismounted infantry in an attack.[1] The Marine Corps has identified speed on water as a top requirement, even at the cost of troop carrying capacity.[2]

The ACV must be able to self-deploy from an amphibious assault ship at least 12 miles from shore with 17 Marines aboard. It has to be able to travel 8 knots or faster through seas with waves up to three feet. The vehicle is to be operational between 2020 and 2022, with 573 vehicles planned to be procured.[3]

History

A request for information (RFI) was issued to industry on 17 February 2011. The document outlined expected requirements and asked industry for informal design proposals and program methodology feedback. Responses were due by 22 April 2011.[1] An industry day was held on 6 April 2011.

In August 2012, General Dynamics was awarded an ACV Hull Survivability Demonstrator contract for the design, fabrication, and test support of a full-scale hull to demonstrate crew-protection technologies. In November 2012, they conducted simulated mine-blast tests on their ACV ballistic hull design, successfully meeting mine-blast survivability requirements. Work concluded by May 2013 and will be used to refine requirements for effective protection against under-vehicle threats.[4]

In April 2013, DARPA awarded a $1 million prize to a team in the Fast Adaptable Next-Generation Ground Vehicle (FANG) contest. The team beat out 1,000 other competitors to submit their design for a drivetrain for the Amphibious Combat Vehicle. The FANG initiative is to demonstrate a way to procure working systems better than the current defense acquisition process, which frequently leads to delays and cost overruns. The Marines are in charge of the ACV program, so there is no guarantee that the Darpa-crowdsourced mobility drivetrain will result in a vehicle bought by the Corps.[5]

At a roundtable discussion on 26 June 2013, Marine Corps General Jim Amos told the media that the program was still being pursued, and that a request for proposals (RFP) would be issued in early 2014. The Corps has secured and saved a “moderate amount” of money for early development. With the previous Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle cancelled from cost overruns, the Marines are being cautious to identify trade-offs between requirements and cost for the platform. Amos noted that they were working with contractors to see which type of vehicle would meet requirements without proving too costly.[6]

Variants

The three basic variants include the Squad Maneuver/Fighting Vehicle, the Command and Control Vehicle, and the Recovery and Maintenance Vehicle.

References

  1. ^ a b c Marine Corps Systems Command (17 February 2011). "A--Amphibious Combat Vehicle". Archived from the original on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 4 September 2011. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  2. ^ Marine Corps Insists on High Speed ACV - DoDBuzz.com, May 14, 2013
  3. ^ Amphibious Combat Vehicle Stalled Amidst Budget, Requirements Uncertainty - Nationaldefensemagazine.com, February 2013.
  4. ^ General Dynamics Amphibious Combat Vehicle Hull Design Meets Marine Corps' Survivability Requirement - Prnewswire.com, 5 November 2012.
  5. ^ This Is the Million-Dollar Design for Darpa’s Crowdsourced Swimming Tank - Wired.com, April 22, 2013
  6. ^ RFP For Marine Corps ACV Expected In 2014 - Aviationweek.com, 26 June 2013

Public Domain This article incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of the United States Marine Corps.

Further reading