Synod of Jerusalem (1672): Difference between revisions

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Content deleted Content added
tidy up
c/edit
Line 4: Line 4:


==Calvinist controversy==
==Calvinist controversy==
In 1629, [[Cyril Lucaris]], the [[Patriarch of Constantinople]], published a book in [[Latin]] at [[Geneva]] commonly referred to as the [[Confession of Cyril Lucaris]], with French, English and German translations appearing in the same year. A [[Greek language|Greek]] version called ''[[Eastern Confession of the Christian Faith]]'' appeared in 1631.<ref name=Michaelides>[http://www.jstor.org/pss/3159981 The Greek Orthodox Position on the Confession of Cyril Lucaris] (1943) by George P. Michaelides</ref> Lucaris has been accused of adopting [[Calvinism|Calvinistic views]] and for his view that Calvinism was in fact the faith of the Eastern Church.
[[Cyril Lucaris]], the [[Patriarch of Constantinople]], had corresponded with Western scholars and had adopted [[Calvinism|Calvinistic views]]. The [[Confession of Lucaris]] appeared in [[Latin]] at [[Geneva]] in 1629, and in [[Greek language|Greek]], with the addition of four questions, in 1633.


The opposition to [[Calvinism]] arose during Lucaris's lifetime and continued after his death in 1638. It found classic expression in the highly venerated confession of [[Petro Mohyla]], [[Metropolitan of Kiev]] (1643). Though this was intended as a barrier against Calvinistic influences, certain [[Protestantism|Protestant]] writers, and not only [[Roman Catholic Church|Roman Catholics]], persisted in claiming the support of the Greek Church for their positions.
The opposition to [[Calvinism]] arose during Lucaris's lifetime and continued after his death in 1638. It found classic expression in the highly venerated confession of [[Petro Mohyla]], [[Metropolitan of Kiev]] (1643). Though this was intended as a barrier against Calvinistic influences, certain [[Protestantism|Protestant]] writers, and not only [[Roman Catholic Church|Roman Catholics]], persisted in claiming the support of the Greek Church for their positions.
Line 11: Line 11:


==Refutation of Calvinism==
==Refutation of Calvinism==
The Synod refuted the [[Confession of Cyril Lucaris]] article by article.<ref>[http://www.jstor.org/view/00096407/sp040038/04x0573a/0 The Greek Orthodox Position on the Confession of Cyril Lucaris] by George P. Michaelides</ref> Against both the Roman Catholic Church and most Protestants, however, the Synod affirmed that the [[Holy Ghost]] proceeds from [[God the Father]] alone and not from both Father and Son. This rejection of the [[Filioque clause]] was not unwelcome to the Turks, though it does not mean that the decisions were made under political pressure from the Ottoman Empire.
The Synod refuted the Confession of Lucaris article by article.<ref name=Michaelides /> Against both the Roman Catholic Church and most Protestants, however, the Synod affirmed that the [[Holy Ghost]] proceeds from [[God the Father]] alone and not from both Father and Son. This rejection of the [[Filioque clause]] was not unwelcome to the Turks, though it does not mean that the decisions were made under political pressure from the Ottoman Empire.


The Synod re-affirmed existing Orthodox beliefs. ''Decree 1'' of ''The Confession of Dositheus'' begins thus:
The Synod re-affirmed existing Orthodox beliefs. ''Decree 1'' of ''The Confession of Dositheus'' begins thus:

Revision as of 10:45, 24 February 2010

The Synod of Jerusalem was convened by Greek Orthodox Patriarch Dositheos Notaras in March, 1672. Because the occasion was the consecration of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, it is also called the Synod of Bethlehem.

The Synod was attended by most of the prominent representatives of the Eastern Church, including six Metropolitans besides Dositheus and his retired predecessor, and its decrees received universal acceptance as an expression of the faith of the Greek Orthodox Church.

Calvinist controversy

In 1629, Cyril Lucaris, the Patriarch of Constantinople, published a book in Latin at Geneva commonly referred to as the Confession of Cyril Lucaris, with French, English and German translations appearing in the same year. A Greek version called Eastern Confession of the Christian Faith appeared in 1631.[1] Lucaris has been accused of adopting Calvinistic views and for his view that Calvinism was in fact the faith of the Eastern Church.

The opposition to Calvinism arose during Lucaris's lifetime and continued after his death in 1638. It found classic expression in the highly venerated confession of Petro Mohyla, Metropolitan of Kiev (1643). Though this was intended as a barrier against Calvinistic influences, certain Protestant writers, and not only Roman Catholics, persisted in claiming the support of the Greek Church for their positions.

The Synod of Jerusalem sought to put to an end the Calvinists thesis of unconditional predestination and of justification by faith alone, and its advocacy of traditional Orthodox doctrines about the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist and the fate of the soul after death, which some commentators have regarded as substantially the same as the Roman Catholic views of transubstantiation and personal eschatology. Protestant writers say that this eastern hostility to Calvinism had been fanned by the Jesuits.[2]

Refutation of Calvinism

The Synod refuted the Confession of Lucaris article by article.[1] Against both the Roman Catholic Church and most Protestants, however, the Synod affirmed that the Holy Ghost proceeds from God the Father alone and not from both Father and Son. This rejection of the Filioque clause was not unwelcome to the Turks, though it does not mean that the decisions were made under political pressure from the Ottoman Empire.

The Synod re-affirmed existing Orthodox beliefs. Decree 1 of The Confession of Dositheus begins thus:

We believe in one God, true, almighty, and infinite, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit; the Father unbegotten; the Son begotten of the Father before the ages, and consubstantial with Him; and the Holy Spirit proceeding from the Father, and consubstantial with the Father and the Son. These three Persons in one essence we call the All-holy Trinity, — by all creation to be ever blessed, glorified, and adored. [3]

Notwithstanding this, the synod refused to believe that the heretical confession it refuted was actually by a former patriarch of Constantinople; yet the proofs of its genuineness seem to most scholars overwhelming. In negotiations between Anglican and Russian churchmen the confession usually comes to the front.

Importance and criticism

The 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica called the Synod of Jerusalem "the most vital statement of faith made in the Greek Church during the past thousand years." Protestant scholar Philip Schaff wrote "This Synod is the most important in the modern history of the Eastern Church, and may be compared to the Council of Trent."[4]However, modern Eastern or Greek Orthodoxy is much more reserved about the abiding dogmatic authority of this synod. The fact that the Greek bishops often received their training at Latin schools (notably in Venice) accounts for what the late Georges Florovsky termed the "pseudomorphosis" of Orthodox theology.

Subsequent regional synods have certainly felt free to revisit the issues addressed in Jerusalem. Hence, on the issue of the Old Testament canon, a different position was adopted in the Longer Catechism of Philaret of Moscow.

English translation of the decrees

The Acts and Decrees of the Synod of Jerusalem was translated directly from the Greek, and edited with notes, by J.N.W.B. Robertson (London, 1899). The text of Chapter VI, which sets forth the Orthodox faith in eighteen decrees and four questions, commonly known as The Confession of Dositheus, can be consulted at the Web site Confession of Dositheus.

References

  1. ^ a b The Greek Orthodox Position on the Confession of Cyril Lucaris (1943) by George P. Michaelides
  2. ^ "Jerusalem (After 1291)". Catholic Encyclopedia. 1913. Retrieved 2008-07-10.
  3. ^ Calvinism as Heresy [1]
  4. ^ "Creeds of Christendom".

Further reading

Wetzer-Welte Kirchenlexikon, 2nd ed., vi . 1357 sqq

External links