User talk:Lourdes: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Content deleted Content added
→‎ARC: new section
Line 822: Line 822:


{{You've got mail|dashlesssig=— [[User:TheresNoTime|TheresNoTime]] ([[User talk:TheresNoTime|talk]] • they/them) 09:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)}}
{{You've got mail|dashlesssig=— [[User:TheresNoTime|TheresNoTime]] ([[User talk:TheresNoTime|talk]] • they/them) 09:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)}}

== ARC ==

I've listed you as a party in [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#INVOLVED actions of TheresNoTime]], but am not calling for any action against you. I'd rather you weren't listed as a party at all, but I don't think that's an option. I'm sorry if this ends up causing you drama. — [[User:TheresNoTime|TheresNoTime]] ([[User talk:TheresNoTime|talk]] • they/them) 11:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:44, 13 October 2022

Hello!

Hello, Lourdes,

I was working on empty categories, saw Category:Defunct museums in Kentucky on the list and also saw that you deleted it and realized that I hadn't seen your name pop up in quite a while. I hope you are well and just busy with life. Not much else to say, just that I noticed you were back and wish you well! Liz Read! Talk! 16:32, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Liz, all well here. Just spending my time relaxing these days. Will jump back in a few weeks. Hope you are doing well too. Love, Lourdes 10:12, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello Lourdes,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.


To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

Administrators' newsletter – October 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
  • Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
  • The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.

Miscellaneous

  • Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
  • The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

Administrators' newsletter – November 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


PageCuration

Hi, I used to patrol via PageCuration. Now the PageCuration toolbar does not appear on right side to me. Unable to Disable the page curation toolbar right at the bottom of that page as it not available. Could you have a look my settings? Thanks. --AntanO 01:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

Administrators' newsletter – December 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).

Administrator changes

removed A TrainBerean HunterEpbr123GermanJoeSanchomMysid

Technical news

  • Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
  • The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)

Arbitration



Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

Administrators' newsletter – January 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The functionaries email list (functionaries-en@lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

Administrators' newsletter – February 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed suppress in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.
  • The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Page curation script

Hi Lourdes; I wanted to get some ideas of using your Page curation script on Urdu Wikipedia. It'd be quite helpful for the Urdu Wikipedia community, in case, if the patroller group is created on that Wiki. Regards, ─ The Aafī (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

Administrators' newsletter – March 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 27 March 2022

Administrators' newsletter – April 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the deletelogentry and deletedhistory rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928)
  • When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. (T284114)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

  1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
  2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

Administrators' newsletter – May 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration


Hi

Glad to see you are still around, I thought we had lost you forever. I don't edit much at all these days but don't hesitate to email me if there's anything particular on your mind. Take care, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

Administrators' newsletter – June 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
  • The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.

Arbitration


About your Page Curation script

I had adapted your User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js into User:NotReallySoroka/review.js, and have credited you at the latter page. Thank you for your work developing the former script. NotReallySoroka (talk) 23:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

Hello

Hi, Lourdes,

I saw your name in the Deletion log and realized that I hadn't run into you since back in 2021. I hope you are well and can return to editing one day. Take care. Liz Read! Talk! 05:09, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:56, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).

Technical news

  • user_global_editcount is a new variable that can be used in abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (T130439)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter.

Your G6 deletions

Hello, Lourdes. From what I can see, you have stopped editing Wikipedia, but have continued making logged actions. This is to note that I have restored two G6s you have carried out, as they were not uncontroversial maintenance. The specific reasons I did so are outlined here and here. Attribution must be maintained when material is copied across on Wikipedia, and deletion of such redirects with non-trivial page histories defeat that goal. A redirect from a page move does not qualify under G6, unless it was obviously created in the wrong namespace (and even then I would argue that deletion would cause more harm than good). FYI: Kaleeb18 and Apaugasma. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sdrqaz: I of course checked for internal links before I nominated Draft:Mohammad Ali Amir-Moezzi for G6. Now I did not know about WP:EXTERNALROT, but I'm still kind of amazed that you would think that there would be any external website linking to something like https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Mohammad_Ali_Amir-Moezzi. I'm guessing it's more the principle that counts here, that since redirects from draft space do no cause anyone any trouble, and since deleting them may in some rare cases cause external link rot, it's better to just always leave them be? ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 19:23, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Apaugasma, there is consensus that draftspace redirects should not be deleted (Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 135 § Draft Namespace Redirects). But yes, generally speaking if a page isn't causing any harm, there's not much point in deleting it. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but what does a redirect from a page move qualify for then if it is not G6? ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 19:33, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kaleeb18, the part of the message about redirects from page moves was more for Apaugasma than for you. This isn't meant to be an exhaustive list, but redirects from page moves can qualify under G3 (page-move vandalism), G7 (if there was only one substantial author before the move), G8 (if the redirect becomes broken and cannot be repaired), R2 (usually for mainspace redirects to userspace or draftspace), and R3 (only if the moved page was also recently created). Sdrqaz (talk) 16:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh ok. 16:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC) ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 16:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

Administrators' newsletter – August 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).

Administrator changes

readded Valereee
removed Anthony Appleyard (deceased) • CapitalistroadsterSamsara

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC has been closed with consensus to add javascript that will show edit notices for editors editing via a mobile device. This only works for users using a mobile browser, so iOS app editors will still not be able to see edit notices.
  • An RfC has been closed with the consensus that train stations are not inherently notable.

Technical news

  • The Wikimania 2022 Hackathon will take place virtually from 11 August to 14 August.
  • Administrators will now see links on user pages for "Change block" and "Unblock user" instead of just "Block user" if the user is already blocked. (T308570)

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case request Geschichte has been automatically closed after a 3 month suspension of the case.

Miscellaneous

  • You can vote for candidates in the 2022 Board of Trustees elections from 16 August to 30 August. Two community elected seats are up for election.
  • Wikimania 2022 is taking place virtually from 11 August to 14 August. The schedule for wikimania is listed here. There are also a number of in-person events associated with Wikimania around the world.
  • Tech tip: When revision-deleting on desktop, hold ⇧ Shift between clicking two checkboxes to select every box in that range.

Something is wrong with the PageCuration script

Something is wrong with User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js. Whenever I'd log in it would start creating infinite number of links to Page Curation. Then I would not be able to click on anything else on that page. I had to disable it to effectively regain control of my account.VR talk 17:34, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

Administrators' newsletter – September 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).

Guideline and policy news

  • A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
  • An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
  • The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.

Miscellaneous

  • The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
  • Voting for candidates for the Wikimedia Board of Trustees is open until 6 September.

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

Administrators' newsletter – October 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


ok:)

ready to go 24.208.220.45 (talk) 16:34, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request to nominate me as a wikipedia Admin

I hereby request you to evaluate me and my chances of becoming a Wikipedia admin. I mostly use my mobile phone to make edits since i usually make them while on the go. If you find my edits and request okay, please nominate me. Alvinategyeka (talk) 03:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revert your unblock

That was an awful reason to unblock Athaenara — consensus for the block was found at ANI. Please revert your unblock immediately. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 08:16, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will have to agree with TheresNoTime. This was a bad decision to make so boldly, especially considering the hateful statements that were said. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 08:24, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your unblock of Athaenara

Hi Lourdes,

Hope you're doing well? Just a quick one, I note you've unblocked Athaenara so she's able to contribute to the ArbCom discussion, however I'm wondering if a full unblock might lead to problems per the consensus at WP:ANI that the initial block was justified. Understand the premise of allowing them to contribute to the argument over at ARBCOM or any future ANI discussion without feeling like they have to have every talk page watcher see the messages first, but there's no community consensus for a full sitewide unblock, I'd suggest restricting to just Wikipedia-space and Userspace at most. Thanks! Mike1901 (talk) 08:17, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just to amend my comment (I'd forgotten that the original comment was made in Wikipedia space, so even a partial unblock there would be inappropriate in my opinion). I now think a full reversal of your unblock would be best here. Mike1901 (talk) 08:26, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/CaseTheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 08:22, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are rumbling at RFAR that your unblock of Athaenara should be reviewed as part of a full case. While I am trying to discourage that, I do want to note somewhere, in case you value my opinion, that your unblock was not just a bad idea, but an actual misuse of the admin tools. Not serious enough to warrant being raked over the coals, but a true misuse. There was already an overwhelming consensus at ANI to keep the block in place. It was not your right to over-rule that. I assume this isn't a pattern, so that's all I feel is necessary. But it might make the RFAR less screwed up - an make your life easier - if you actually acknowledge that the unblock was incorrect at the RFAR page. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:17, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 08:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request

I see that you have unblocked Athaenara to participate in the Arbitration request. That was not necessary - as I mentioned on both her talk page and at ARC, she can request comments be copied over - as per our normal practise. I don't believe any arbitrator has requested her unblocked, so if your only reason was to allow participation at Arbcom, please can you reverse your action? If, on the other hand, you believe she should be unblocked generally - well, that's a different matter. WormTT(talk) 08:32, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, Lourdes. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 09:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ARC

I've listed you as a party in Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#INVOLVED actions of TheresNoTime, but am not calling for any action against you. I'd rather you weren't listed as a party at all, but I don't think that's an option. I'm sorry if this ends up causing you drama. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 11:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]