Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arizeuo: Difference between revisions
→Suspected sockpuppets: double bubble |
think this fixes it? |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
<!-- Enter your evidence above. You do not need to sign it - it will be signed for you. --> |
|||
<!-- PLEASE SUPPORT YOUR EVIDENCE WITH DIFFS; IT IS NOT UP TO ADMINS, CLERKS OR CHECKUSERS TO ESTABLISH YOUR ARGUMENT FOR YOU. --> |
|||
|admincomment= |
|||
<!-- Any comment here will go directly into the "Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments" section. |
|||
DO NOT write anything here unless you are one of those three and know what you are doing. Just leave it blank otherwise. |
|||
You MUST sign your comment with ~~~~. This feature is intended for pro forma reports (reports made for the record only, no action is required). |
|||
WARNING: Writing anything here will cause the case to be marked as CLOSED for the clerks to review and archive. --> |
|||
<!--|status= --> |
|||
<!--Uncomment the above line and put in an appropriate value for the parameter to set the status of the case manually. This overrides all other parameters. Intended for clerk use only. --> |
|||
}} |
|||
Revision as of 20:58, 20 February 2022
Arizeuo
- Arizeuo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Populated account categories: confirmed
20 February 2022
– This SPI case is open.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Parisnola (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
User:Arizeuo last edited on 6 February 2022. Parisnola's account was created on 5 February 2022. Arizeuo's almost sole topic of editing is Nous Foundation, which is currently at AfD; both Arizeuo and Parisnola have provided the sole "Keep" !votes in that discussion ([1],[2]).
The similarity of language style and argument suggests that they are sitting very close to each other indeed. Compare Arizueo—Overall, the article...
, The article can be updated to ensure additional sources...
and I would recommend not deleting...
—with Parisnola: Overall, this organization...
, Further information could be added from the sources listed...
and I would recommend keeping..
. Both arguments are also predicated on Nola.com and Big Easy Magazine.
CU? Well, I wouldn't have thought there'd be any sleepers, and I think it's clearly SOCK rather than MEAT, but there's a sound argument for checking. Cheers, SN54129 19:50, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.