Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Decrease: Difference between revisions

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 113.185.44.176 (talk) to last version by Johnuniq
Tags: Rollback Reverted
already decline last request, someone else should take it
Line 14: Line 14:
*'''Automated comment:''' A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last [[WP:RFPPA|8 days]].—[[User:Cyberbot I|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot I</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-13.5ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot I|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 04:48, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
*'''Automated comment:''' A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last [[WP:RFPPA|8 days]].—[[User:Cyberbot I|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot I</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-13.5ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot I|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 04:48, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
* It's extended-confirmed protected because it's been repeatedly targeted by a long-term vandal. I guess we could try semi-protection again, but it didn't accomplish anything last time. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 05:14, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
* It's extended-confirmed protected because it's been repeatedly targeted by a long-term vandal. I guess we could try semi-protection again, but it didn't accomplish anything last time. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 05:14, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
:[[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Declined'''<!-- Template:RFPP#deny --> This has been requested five times by a shifting IP without any explanation of their interest. The IPs make no other edits. For the record:
:*[[Special:Diff/1065562688|14 January 2022]] by [[Special:Contributions/125.235.60.206|125.235.60.206]]
:*[[Special:Diff/1068836259|30 January 2022]] by [[Special:Contributions/113.185.42.202|113.185.42.202]]
:*[[Special:Diff/1068984651|31 January 2022]] by [[Special:Contributions/113.185.42.90|113.185.42.90]]
:*[[Special:Diff/1069218874|1 February 2022]] by [[Special:Contributions/113.185.40.162|113.185.40.162]]
:*[[Special:Diff/1069404219|2 February 2022]] by [[Special:Contributions/113.185.46.67|113.185.46.67]]
:[[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 04:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:03, 4 February 2022

Requests for page protection

Click here to return to Requests for page protection.

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Highway shield

Reason: This page's "persistent vandalism" appears to mostly have been caused by a single IP address over a single day. I feel as though indefinite semi-protection was a bit much for something like this. In addition, this page is rather infrequently edited and not highly visible. Computerfan0 (talk) 21:06, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mitchazenia: – protecting admin. Favonian (talk) 21:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Johnuniq (talk) 04:05, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnam

Reason: There looks like two edit requests, not one. And the extended protection maybe hindered people from contributing to it. Like said, the treatment for vandalism here is bizarre, where in other articles is semi-protection. 113.185.46.67 (talk) 04:35, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy @NinjaRobotPirate:. (CC) Tbhotch 04:42, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I say this is ludicrous that unprotection is sought for such a volatile page--CreecregofLife (talk) 04:46, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]