Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:Standard license violation letter" on Wikipedia
- "I am the copyright holder of the above works", how does the license allow me to say that? Pi-or-tau (talk) 15:18, 30 November 2016 (UTC)...230 bytes (28 words) - 10:54, 9 December 2022
- about the GFDL status of the content, which is a violation of the GFDL), but we don't have a standard letter for this. Could somebody write one? I'll do it...26 KB (4,037 words) - 08:20, 17 May 2022
- work"]] * [[Wikipedia:Spotting possible copyright violations]] * [[Wikipedia:Standard license violation letter]] * [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Copyright Cleanup]]...44 KB (5,744 words) - 21:55, 14 March 2025
- around. See the edits leading up to it [3]. I have sent them a standard GFDL violation letter using this form on their site. — CharlotteWebb 02:15, 31 May...55 KB (8,076 words) - 09:50, 21 March 2023
- MediaWiki:Edittools Wikipedia:Text of the GNU Free Documentation License Wikipedia:Standard GFDL violation letter Wikipedia:GFDL upgrade MBisanz talk 19:01, 23 November...32 KB (3,974 words) - 22:04, 17 January 2025
- RoySmith (talk) 19:18, 7 January 2022 (UTC) @RoySmith: Wikipedia:Standard license violation letter. Just make sure that the website is using text you wrote....72 KB (8,670 words) - 00:19, 1 July 2023
- misunderstanding" that you "need to clear up", and nominate Wikipedia:Standard CC-BY-SA violation letter for deletion. Ownership is a separate issue, for which the...26 KB (4,084 words) - 04:03, 31 January 2023
- should the any of your original contributions be copied in violation of the GFDL license. Any such agent shall be indemnified by you as long as they...112 KB (18,996 words) - 02:48, 3 April 2024
- misunderstanding" that you "need to clear up", and nominate Wikipedia:Standard CC-BY-SA violation letter for deletion. Ownership is a separate issue, for which the...54 bytes (5,324 words) - 22:03, 2 December 2022
- you cure the violation within one month after finding out about it (but it is unclear how to cure a violation if, for example, you violated the terms in...38 KB (5,570 words) - 15:45, 1 October 2024
- Wikipedia talk:External links/YouTube (section "Resionable belife" vs "required licensing information", a comparison by example.)obviously a violation of WP:C I remove it. If it's a violation of WP:EL, I remove it. If it's a violation of WP:V I remove it. If it's a violation of WP:NOT...250 KB (39,797 words) - 10:13, 5 March 2022
- Wikipedia talk:Mirrors and forks/Archive 1 (section Take-down letter time for basicclassics.com - please help)discussion to Wikipedia talk:Standard GFDL violation letter, so that we can come up with a standard "sternly-worded followup letter." Or alternatively, if anyone...64 KB (10,527 words) - 21:43, 14 March 2023
- this under the "Dealing with copyright violations" heading: Copyright violation tags Once a copyright violation tag has been placed, it is generally inappropriate...245 KB (33,993 words) - 14:55, 28 January 2023
- Sincerely, [insert your name]" There are some letters at Wikipedia:Standard GFDL violation letter. MB 06:50 9 Jul 2003 (UTC) Also, Wikipedia doesn't have any...18 KB (3,015 words) - 22:49, 14 April 2010
- hosted without following the licensing requirements for attribution, please see Wikipedia:Standard license violation letter. Sounds good to me in general...208 KB (30,955 words) - 06:53, 30 January 2023
- send them the Wikipedia:Standard GFDL violation letter or does wikimedia foundation have a policy to deal with such violations? I am asking because I guided...136 KB (19,968 words) - 14:55, 28 January 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Example requests for permission/Archive 1 (section Possible typo in formal letter 1.4.1)a so-called "free license" Since the not there seems to indicate we can not use "free license" material, I do not think the letter means what we really...53 KB (7,924 words) - 11:56, 28 February 2024
- Wikipedia has much higher standards, and in most cases it is only a violation of them. Ripping off an image from someone else and licensing as if you made it...343 KB (42,046 words) - 01:23, 27 January 2025
- possible copyright violation or it doesn't. If it does, it is supposed to be blanked and replaced with {{copyvio}} (unless the violation is blatant, in which...203 KB (30,631 words) - 13:36, 4 February 2023
- recognizing Wikipedia or GFDL licence please see Wikipedia:Standard GFDL violation letter --CyclePat (talk) 20:00, 4 August 2008 (UTC) Could you please...201 KB (28,364 words) - 23:24, 3 April 2023
- with permission. not copyrighted != not a copyright violation. A work may not be a copyright violation and still be copyrighted in country the servers are
- If you respond to my query, will I be notified even if I am a Scarlet Letter member? Thank you for your time, Wordreader (talk) 23:39, 2 November 2022
- don't follow the terms of these licenses should be labeled as fair use, using the appropriate template and fair use standards, if the images are to be used