Search results

Results 1 – 20 of 5,316
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:RFA" on Wikipedia

View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  • be extended-confirmed protected and transcluded to the main, unprotected RfA page. This way non-30/500 folks can still comment and ask questions but their...
    38 KB (5,155 words) - 02:46, 21 August 2024
  • talk:RfA reform 2011. Please continue it here) So far everybody is talking about RfA reform as a modification of the current RfA model... IMO, RfA is so...
    181 KB (27,429 words) - 22:27, 24 May 2022
  • promoting admins. Do you really think that for every candidate who passes RfA, there are two more that "should have" but either werent interested or were...
    44 KB (5,959 words) - 14:18, 28 January 2023
  • were: Changed the names of sections from RfC to correspond to the proposed RfA method Changed the meaning of the instructions. The previous instructions...
    9 KB (1,241 words) - 10:23, 5 March 2022
  • WT:RFA/R redirects here. You might be looking for Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration. Before commenting, please consider data from the Adminship...
    181 KB (26,334 words) - 04:56, 2 August 2023
  • The main issue with RfA is not the baggage the candidates bring with them, but the totally different voters that turn up for each RfA, their criteria, and...
    7 KB (1,040 words) - 05:00, 22 February 2017
  • 18:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC) On my RfA Review page, I said: ...I believe there are many people who hang out at WP:RfA would can tell with 80% or 90% accuracy...
    32 KB (4,647 words) - 01:16, 26 March 2023
  • from User:Kudpung/RfA reform Swarm X 20:27, 2 April 2011 (UTC) Both Errant and Worm That Turned have recently raised the idea at WT:RFA of using clerks...
    131 KB (18,548 words) - 23:17, 21 March 2023
  • no real need to do so. Three certifiers are needed just to make sure that RFAs without a snowball's chance in hell don't go forward. - Stephanie Daugherty...
    42 KB (2,232 words) - 17:12, 4 February 2023
  • realistic first step into RFA reform, and I look forward to seeing how it will work to help solve some of the problems at RFA. I do think that there is...
    71 KB (515 words) - 02:43, 16 May 2022
  • good form to sound out the prospective nominee first before you create the RfA subpage, as if the nominee really wants to wait or doesn't want to be an...
    9 KB (1,149 words) - 17:33, 26 November 2023
  • Note: Copied to Wikipedia talk:RfA reform 2011/Voter profiles - Please continue the discussion there. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)...
    71 KB (3,231 words) - 18:26, 3 March 2023
  • new RFA should be filed on https://github.com/azatoth/twinkle or as a normal discussion at WT:TW...
    1 KB (0 words) - 02:01, 3 June 2011
  • to leave Wikipedia after failed RfAs, including My76Strat, whose original RfA was a major motivator in starting this project. Anyway, I think we're at...
    61 KB (4,412 words) - 19:04, 4 February 2023
  • Here are some ideas which I had after my own failed RfA last December. The overall question of experience (length of time, number of edits, amount of...
    50 KB (5,537 words) - 19:55, 27 July 2020
  • or less indefinitely so that when this inevitably comes back around at WT:RFA discussion can be redirected to this dedicated forum. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:40...
    590 bytes (98 words) - 01:40, 15 September 2010
  • actual precedent for people openly speculating about someone being a sock at RfA? To me, this seems like it's kind of a personal attack – we're literally...
    245 KB (37,019 words) - 00:06, 7 November 2022
  • 30 April 2022 (UTC) I've been reverted too, for blanking my own old RfA. My RfA is ancient history. I think the presumption should be in favor of failed...
    97 KB (14,245 words) - 17:40, 4 February 2023
  • Full disclosure: I participated in ^demon's RFA, opposing his request. I do not believe that the neutrality of this story was affected by my personal...
    750 bytes (97 words) - 00:35, 1 March 2008
  • written all FAs and would pass RFA, but read the new ORCP edit notice and decided that they were going to give up their RFA aspirations because of it. But...
    9 KB (1,002 words) - 06:24, 23 April 2024
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)