Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Actions along the Matanikau
Appearance
Respectfully request a peer review to highlight any problems or issues that this article may have before considering nominating it for FA. Cla68 00:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Kirill Lokshin
Overall, an excellent article (as usual!); just a few minor formatting and layout issues:
- There are a few month/day dates (particularly near the end of the "Background" section) that aren't wikified.
- The rump "See also" ought to be eliminated; it shouldn't be that difficult to link his name somewhere in the article (even if only in a footnote).
- The Japanese units are generally left unlinked; is this for neatness, or because they don't warrant articles in principle? It'd be nice to have stubs on the ones that do; otherwise, they're likely never to get written.
- "Action" should be "action" in the headings, I think.
Hope that helps! Kirill Lokshin 02:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Corrections made thank-you...except for stub articles on the Japanese units involved. I may get to that eventually. The problem is that the composition of Imperial Japanese Army units is very complicated due to their "triangular" organizations that enabled frequent transfer, reorganization, and renaming of units depending on the mission or circumstances. Anyway, thanks again. Cla68 02:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)