Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2016/01
- 2016
This page is an archive of past discussions from Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to request page protection, please do so at WP:RFPP.
01 January 2016
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep changing the genre to the implausibly specific "French House" and removing sources without giving a valid reason for doing so. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 18:00, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP hopping vandalism. Meters (talk) 21:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 21:13, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Grey padlock is missing. Pickuptha'Musket (talk) 19:06, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:16, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Note: I've added the padlock. Doug Weller talk 19:42, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Done (for the bot) tutterMouse (talk) 19:43, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes. Babymissfortune 08:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Why do you want to have pending changes enabled? I do not see much of disruption in the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor Babymissfortune 14:38, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated trolling by IP. (At least most of us think it is either trolling or vandalism.) 24 hours should whack the mole and get the troll to go somewhere else. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:37, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:41, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Attacks from IP/socks are happening quite a bit at the moment, could I please request a temporary protection for my talk page? diff of recent - Thank you. -- samtar whisper 15:48, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Note: I've watched Samtar's talk page for a bit and I've seen IPs posting about administrator's use of edit filters and etc. as abuse. They once targetted Elockid and now Rule X! Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:39, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing/Addition of Unsourced content. MusaTalk ☻ 07:42, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 07:54, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An anonymous IP editor is persistently removing validly sourced content because (s)he personally disagrees with the sources. There is a discussion underway on the talk page but the edit-warring on the article is becoming disruptive. Betty Logan (talk) 12:13, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:19, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Humanities and language reference desks
- Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Shorten protection/unprotection (whichever is appropriate) - Apparently both pages were semi-protected due to sockpuppetry. However, looking at their page histories, the level of disruption at the time didn't seem to be enough to warrant semi-protection, let alone protection of this length (all the way up until March). I am aware that the desks were semi'd due to IP-hopping, but discussions on the talk page seem to be of the consensus that the length is too much. Potential constructive questions by anonymous users on the said pages could also be affected. Protecting admin Future Perfect at Sunrise did not reply to my message on their talk page. Pinging Elockid (who also briefly protected the two pages before the protections were lifted). If the protection needs to stay for now, I request that the length be shortened: until March seems overkill; maybe a fortnight at most is enough? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
See also: Wikipedia talk:Reference desk#Notice to Good-Faith Unregistered Editors and Wikipedia talk:Reference desk#Protection of ref desks. The latter discussion appears to have some loose consensus that the semi-protection, particularly its length, may be going too far. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- I'm currently working on a solution to mitigate the problem. Good news is that it's had some effectiveness in blocking the disruptive edits. I wouldn't be opposed to modifying the protection/unprotection but it would be nice if a heads up was given so that I can make necessary modifications to the filter. ElockidHappy holidays! 03:31, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
I'll put it on the record that I will remain strongly opposed to any lifting or shortening of the present protection. And, frankly, I'm getting sick and tired of people acting as if protecting those pages was some particularly horrible thing to do. If a regular high-profile article in mainspace was hit by this amount of vandalism, we'd have indef-semiprotection in no time, no questions asked. What's the difference? The collateral damage in the case of mainspace articles is much more serious than here, not less. In mainspace articles, the potential edits we are losing are actual, useful contributions to the encyclopedia. On the refdesks, the number of anon contributions that are actually useful to our project is negligible, always has been. And if the OP thought the level of disruption at the time wasn't high enough, they clearly have no idea what they are talking about. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:13, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- I've been using the reference desk for years and from experience the argument that "the number of anon contributions that are actually useful to our project is negligible, always has been" is inaccurate. While disruption existed here and there, the majority of questions from anonymous users were made in good faith. FPaT, please assume good faith and don't assume that most anonymous contributions to the reference desk are unconstructive; we'd be turning away potential editors in the process. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:11, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- When it comes to the refdesks, "made in good faith" is not the same as "useful to the encyclopedia". Nothing in this has anything to do with assuming or not assuming "good faith". Yes, we are turning away potential editors in the process – just as we always do, on every page we protect. You have still not explained why this effect would be in any way more serious here than on all the thousands of other protected pages, where IPs would be making actual contributions to the encyclopedia but where nobody is complaining. And to speak of disruption "here and there" is a breathtakingly inappropriate use of understatement. There have been persistent attacks on these pages on a daily basis for the last three months at least. WP:RD/H alone had 12 separate protections, totalling about half the days out of the 90 days prior to the current protection, with an average of less than 4 days from the end of one protection to the onset of the next. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:48, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Can you suggest any alternatives to protection then? Because based on the discussions on the talk page there seems to be consensus that protection isn't the answer (at least not yet). Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- No, there isn't any alternative, and given the nature of the criminal harassment that this particular troll's activity have become, I really don't give a fuck about what some people on that talkpage are saying. These pages will remain protected for as long as it takes, and any administrator who lifts it early will be an enabler of harassment. End of discussion. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:05, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Can you suggest any alternatives to protection then? Because based on the discussions on the talk page there seems to be consensus that protection isn't the answer (at least not yet). Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- When it comes to the refdesks, "made in good faith" is not the same as "useful to the encyclopedia". Nothing in this has anything to do with assuming or not assuming "good faith". Yes, we are turning away potential editors in the process – just as we always do, on every page we protect. You have still not explained why this effect would be in any way more serious here than on all the thousands of other protected pages, where IPs would be making actual contributions to the encyclopedia but where nobody is complaining. And to speak of disruption "here and there" is a breathtakingly inappropriate use of understatement. There have been persistent attacks on these pages on a daily basis for the last three months at least. WP:RD/H alone had 12 separate protections, totalling about half the days out of the 90 days prior to the current protection, with an average of less than 4 days from the end of one protection to the onset of the next. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:48, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- I've been using the reference desk for years and from experience the argument that "the number of anon contributions that are actually useful to our project is negligible, always has been" is inaccurate. While disruption existed here and there, the majority of questions from anonymous users were made in good faith. FPaT, please assume good faith and don't assume that most anonymous contributions to the reference desk are unconstructive; we'd be turning away potential editors in the process. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:11, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Not unprotected, no significant evidence provided to suggest unprotection is warranted. Thanks, Nakon 06:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Users behind certain IP addresses (e.g. 125.165.140.200) are consistently making disruptive edits on this article (Sentani Airport) that reflect incorrect information. Multiple attempts to contact them have been unsuccessful. PK-JIN (talk) 19:16, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Nakon 06:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from anons today. Shearonink (talk) 19:18, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 06:24, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP vandalism. Been protected before and the vandals come back, so would like a lengthy protection (month or 2). Joseph2302 (talk) 22:45, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 06:22, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. This page has been constantly vandalized by IP numbers used by blocked User:Opusdei444. I ask for a very long protection, because this IP number is never going to stop it. I also ask these IP numbers to be blocked Xuxo (talk) 23:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 06:22, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated adding of non-relevant information by IPs. The Banner talk 23:33, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Nakon 06:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from anons today. Sasha1550 (talk) 01:24, 01 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 06:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
I made an entry of content , an IP changed it accusing me of WP:POV , what is incorrect as in my entry I cited the exact words included in the source (FIFA.com). As it is a sensitive theme, dealing with passion of club football supporters, I think this kind of vdndalism could happen again.
- "New year, old arguments" (cit.) The article is entitled "Intercontinental Cup", therefore the only subject that interests for making best that article is the Intercontinental Cup, a competition helded between 1960 and 2004 between the representative teams of the, then, world club football's top level: Europe and South America (for that regions come from ALL World Cup winners since 1930 and the CWC since 2000). In the introduction it is stated the one and last thing which is related to the current Club World Cup: for better or worse IC is often presented by FIFA, UEFA and CONMEBOL as its forerunner competition). It has no encyclopedic value fill the article with FALSE ARGUMENTS to decrease the historical value of this competition (as often make this pt.wiki user like his previous versions called EpidemiaCorinthiana/God Football or some of his puppets) or, worse, present to the world the CWC as the "real" world cup. This is frankly ridiculous. Finally, everything described in the lead section was previously agreed with an administrator a while ago, so before unilaterally modify the page, should be contacted in the discussion page as established by the regulations of this website.--2001:1388:3:5D39:E5B8:3878:F370:339E (talk) 02:39, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- P.S. No web should tell something was de facto to put here. Just so it is considered from the point of view of the facts (a.e. Wimbledon is often called in tennis as the sport's "world cup" without ever having been in legal terms, in legal terms has the same value like the others Grand Slam competitions; In USA all World Series winners are called "world champions" despite in fact it is only the American MLB postseason. In both cases, the sporting level is the discriminant and the interclub football's highest level since 1950 until the second half of 1990 was a duopoly between Western Europe and the South America's East Coast). That is the factual truth.
- P.S.2 "has been revamped by FIFA to reach out to all confederations and associations across the globe so the winners may TRULY be regarded as the best club side in the world" its an obvious example of POV. In tha same way, the most sport press regards like that the UCL winner team or some European top league winner if the CL winner is "weak" as in 2012. Repeat, in sports, the sporting level is the only thing that matters...
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Nakon 06:19, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A nice long steady stream of general unconstructiveness from numerous IPs. —DangerousJXD (talk) 05:46, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 06:15, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: After a recent RfC was concluded, there has been continuous edit-warring over a new text in various forms,with only a short break for Christmas. See this, this, this, this. There is a discussion ongoing on the talk page but people are cowboy-editing the article page. See the second last diff above and [1] latest diff. Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 16:50, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Fully protected indefinitely. Nakon 06:27, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another article being hit by the IP sock farm. --Snowded TALK 19:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 06:25, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP's disruptively editing the article adding some term despite being reverted by multiple editors, Cheers. –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 21:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Malcolmxl5. Nakon 06:24, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. NeoBatfreak (talk) 22:33, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 06:23, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page is being repeatedly edited by IPs who are not allowed to edit it, as it is subject to the 30/500 restriction imposed by WP:PIA3. When Other Legends Are Forgotten (talk) 23:52, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Bbb23. Nakon 06:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced speculation added as soon as earlier protection expired. Qed237 (talk) 00:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 06:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection:. Since the last protection expired huge sections of the article have been removed by various IPs. Messages like this show this to be a WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS situation so the attacks on the article are likely to continue. MarnetteD|Talk 01:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 06:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – constantly changing titles, changing chronology, and generally disruptive edits. Has been protected previously. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 03:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 06:16, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current event is occurring on building. Starting to see vandalism by multiple IP addresses. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:18, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Done 12 hours by Foxj BethNaught (talk) 23:20, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. There is news that this player is signing an 8-year deal with the Los Angeles Dodgers but the deal is not yet 100% confirmed. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 02:42, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @50.29.199.144: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:00, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Like the past two talk requests, no need to edit an archived page. Zappa24Mati 05:00, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Done, for the bot. Nakon 06:15, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Vandalism seems to have died off, most edits to the article are now constructive . CatcherStorm talk 11:12, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Pinging the protecting admin, though they seem to be inactive for the moment.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Unprotected Nakon 06:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Nakon: One or more pages in this request have not been unprotected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:45, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resume of disruptive editing from the same IP, who is removing valid information which contradicts the validity of a television soap. livelikemusic my talk page! 13:52, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- These types of edits have had a longtime happening; and it's what warranted its previous page protection in the past, dating back to December 14. It's highly disruptive, same on the Chad page below. The edits violate the on-screen happens on Days of Our Lives, which means people are adding and removed content that contradicts a source (the show itself). livelikemusic my talk page! 15:40, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Constant removal of a valid entry. TaylorMoore2 (talk) 16:09, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:48, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Oh god, it's this time of year again. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 22:44, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 22:46, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
02 January 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user changes page to about Satan. Lbmarshall (talk) 13:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 13:18, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article appears to be the consistent target of vandalism by unregistered users (ip). Rhumidian (talk) 14:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 14:27, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Almost constant editing by anonymous editors who have a penchant for adding and removing characters without explanation or citing sources. clpo13(talk) 16:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit rate is too high right now for PC. Katietalk 17:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Enforcement of WP:ARBPIA3. This request is also for the following articles:
List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, 2001
List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, 2002–06
List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, 2007
List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, 2008
List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, 2009
List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, 2010
List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, 2011
List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, 2012
List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, 2013
List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, 2014
List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, 2015
If these articles can also be added to the edit filter that monitors for 500/30 violations that would be great. If I have to make that request in another venue please let me know. Majora (talk) 10:44, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected I don't know about edit filters – try asking at WP:EFN. BethNaught (talk) 12:36, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Merely six hours after the previous PP was lifted, the IP vandalism starts again. PP needs to be longer this time. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 11:03, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:19, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Done 2 weeks by Michig. BethNaught (talk) 12:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has been temporary-protected twice for vandalism. Now, the vandals are back. Dat GuyTalkContribs 12:05, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 12:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An anonymous IP editor is persistently (now for the secodn time) removing validly sourced content because (s)he personally disagrees with the sources. There is a discussion underway on the talk page but the edit-warring on the article is becoming disruptive. I must add the sources I added are FIFA.com (the most authoritative on world football matters), and the words I wrote in the article are exactly the same words of the source. The IPs are erasinng and replacing the words I put (the exacct same words of the sources) with his/her personal interpretation of the subject (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AIntercontinental_Cup_%28football%29&type=revision&diff=697679594&oldid=696082203). El cazador (talk) 14:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined Looks like a content dispute to me. I suggest you invite the IP to discuss this on the talk page--if you leave them some room there. Drmies (talk) 06:28, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection. Kautilya3 (talk) 14:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Kautilya3, you need to add a reason. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 22:57, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined I assume this is a content dispute. Take it to the talk page. Drmies (talk) 06:24, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Falsification of sourced numbers of combatants by Turkish nationalist editing throug a series of IP addresses. Constantine ✍ 15:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined Sorry, I see only a few such edits in the recent history. Drmies (talk) 06:25, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by dynamic IP addresses. CatcherStorm talk 16:50, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SarahSV (talk) 05:49, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: I just want to protect my page . SakuraMatcha (talk) 08:01, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:25, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Enforcement of WP:ARBPIA3. Majora (talk) 10:14, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aashaa (talk) 20:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 04:53, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term harassment from socks of Starship9000. Not sure how long it will take to make 'em all give up. GABHello! 22:15, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 2 months. Let us know when you no longer need the protection. EdJohnston (talk) 05:05, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by unregistered editors. eurodyne (talk) 05:45, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 05:52, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by unregistered editors following a recent defeat. ElKevbo (talk) 20:16, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:51, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 00:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:33, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. one week by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 04:56, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit-warring over addition of original research and not reliably sourced or confirmed. livelikemusic talk! 00:07, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:55, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 00:48, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:57, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – 10 new/IP editors in the last 2 months have disrupted this page, mainly through sneaky vandalism of infobox. Therefore, I believe a month or 2 of PC will help alleviate the issue. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:08, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:59, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by one or more unregistered editors. ElKevbo (talk) 04:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 05:01, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – repeated removal of {{ARBPIA}} tags by IP editor not allowed to edit this article at all, per WP:PIA3. When Other Legends Are Forgotten (talk) 15:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Just nowiki'd that template -- samtar whisper 15:49, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:46, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Done by another admin.BethNaught (talk) 21:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Keeps being changed from a redirect to something about Moses Prince of Egypt learning mathematics, astronomy, numerology etc . Doug Weller talk 17:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- And IP's comment to me on their talk page suggests that this isn't something that can be worked out by discussion. Doug Weller talk 17:46, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:56, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: This footballer now is notable as he plays in turkish league which is WP:FPL and player passes WP:NFOOTBALL. See soccerway for confirmation. Qed237 (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
03 January 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two anon IPs are also calling other users "Super Jew Hater" and "Nazi Jew". TF { Contribs } { Edit Quest! } 16:18, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined We talked about this at ANI yesterday, and it's a personal vendetta against an admin. He says he's got it under control, and I'll take him at his word. Katietalk 17:05, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP's vandalizing weather data. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:11, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 15:07, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Persistent disruptive editing, persistent vandalism by registered and unregistered users. TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 21:22, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:58, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Persistent disruptive editing, persistent vandalism by registered and unregistered users. TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 21:24, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP addresses keep vandalising the article, which I am hardly able to rectify. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined. This is just one IP, it this is vandalism (which I after a superficial check was not able to determine), please apply at WP:AIV.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – repetitive inane changes to article by replacing infobox with that of an unrelated BLP. Page needs locking. Echoedmyron (talk) 15:10, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Also, majority of edits lately by registered editors, so don't just block IPs. Echoedmyron (talk) 15:16, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Seriously, THREE times in last 24 hours. This needs to stop. Echoedmyron (talk) 17:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vand by various Ips now, though might be SP. AIV no use here as IPs change. Poepkop (talk) 15:46, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. three days by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 17:26, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing Vandalism. TF { Contribs } { Edit Quest! } 13:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., I see some unhelpful edits but no clear disruption in the last several days.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous semi-protection was for 3 months and 9 days. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:00, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 16:18, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Already done. Katietalk 16:56, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eteethan(talk)🎄 16:29, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, personal attacks at me and others. Poepkop (talk) 16:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Already done. Katietalk 16:56, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: An IP hopping anon user keeps on posting hoax information (likely from a kid who dreams of having his own TV station) on this article multiple times since December. WayKurat (talk) 04:22, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:08, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Most edits are made by IP users and recently an IP user blanked a section in the article. Babymissfortune 08:51, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:04, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two IPs are Edit Warring over this artist's name. TF { Contribs } { Edit Quest! } 10:32, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:06, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumed vandalism from sockpuppets. Psychonaut (talk) 10:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:02, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editwarring by dynamic IPs . CatcherStorm talk 10:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:01, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. RichardOSmith (talk) 15:01, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Due to the political nature of the page, it is seen persistent IP vandelism from vested interests on either side, mass-deletions etc. At the moment the article is under consideration for deletion and until this is adjudicated I think having the article under semi-protection would be manifestly useful. Mrkingpenguin (talk) 13:57, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:56, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring by dynamic IP with refusal to discuss on the talk page. StAnselm (talk) 14:24, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:57, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Has been edited with unofficial news (re: being vandalized) for the last little bit by unregistered users. ハロー☆リンク-Hello Link- 14:39, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:19, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High Alteration of Names and Dates. Inaccurate dates and names will mess up Philippine History Goodmorning.tine (talk) 03:31, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Note: Nearly all of the users' only contributions involve the page Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:12, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:23, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editing tests are affecting the article's stability and protection is surely required. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:55, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Content dispute over spelling of "fuse" Vs "fuze". Although discussion is ongoing on the talk page, a number of editors are still adding their own preferred versions. I'm not sure what level of protection would be best, as those involved include some experienced (and therefore auto-confirmed) editors. Chaheel Riens (talk) 10:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 10:51, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Administrator Protection: Persistent disruptive editing – while change [2] to [3] has been disruptive anything has messing up. Oripaypaykim (talk) 07:34, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Edit-warring Dat GuyTalkContribs 12:11, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 02:08, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Downgrading to pending changes. Not very much logs that justifies indefinite semi. Only two logs of semi; one for temporary several month semi and one for the indef semi. Might need to ask SilkTork for permission of pending changes. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 22:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the curtsey note, though my permission is not needed; however I will give my views. The article was being significantly vandalised at the point of protection. For the year previous almost every edit was either vandalism or a revert of vandalism. For an article with a balance between vandalism and positive edits by unregistered accounts then Pending Changes is a viable option, but for an article where for a year the edits were all, bar one, hostile, then using Pending Changes would create work for no benefit, as each edit would need to be approved or declined. As a few years have passed, removing the protection to see what happens might be worth considering. And then a judgement could be made as to which form of protection is more appropriate. But currently, based on the article history, Pending Changes is not a viable option. SilkTork ✔Tea time 10:54, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotected SilkTork is absolutely correct. There's no advantage to a downgrade to pending changes. It's either going to be fine, in which case PC isn't needed, or it's going to blow up in our faces, in which case the PC reviewers will get a ton of pointless work before it's semi-protected again. We'll roll the dice and take our chances. :-) Katietalk 18:07, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Seems a good idea. Let's hope for the best that we don't have to semi this article again. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 20:47, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @KrakatoaKatie: One or more pages in this request have not been unprotected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:11, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs vandalising in the past days. Poepkop (talk) 17:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:11, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – The page was recently semi-protected due to disruptive editing. The disruptive editing started back up almost immediately following unprotection of the page. clpo13(talk) 20:36, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:13, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Conifer (talk) 04:30, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 04:38, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various disruptive IP addresses edits. Babymissfortune 07:51, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:07, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: – Someone had (I think unintentionally) added an editors name to the template which was then being added to the talkpage of whoever I gave the greeting too and as it's a constantly used template me thinks it should perhaps be protected indef, Thanks. –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 16:11, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined It's substituted onto talk pages, not transcluded, so a) it doesn't qualify for template protection, and b) there wouldn't be any damage to the encyclopedia from disruptive edits anyway. (BTW, this is why you should always use the 'preview' button, even when substituting a template.) Katietalk 17:36, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Well I've seen substituted templates protected more than once hence this request, Why would I need to preview it? .... I would never expect vandalism to occur so that'd just be a waste of time....,, AH well thanks for declining I guess..... –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 20:58, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High volume of vandalistic edits between 1st January and 2nd January. This is linked to transfer speculation with a move to Rangers. . Blethering Scot 21:34, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:04, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by one or more unregistered editors (university president is being replaced by Ohio State University football player following Notre Dame loss). ElKevbo (talk) 00:19, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:02, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Protecting my own user page. Babymissfortune 15:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP addresses continues vandalising the article, by believing that nothing could stop him. An essential article such this must be protected permanently. Angry Lawyer (talk) 16:39, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Working on a rangeblock for the IP, but I think there's too much collateral damage. Might be able to get part of it, though.Katietalk 17:47, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 78.149.204.128/26 (64 users) and 78.149.112.0/22 (1056 users) blocked three months for disruptive editing. The second is a tad large but no constructive edits came from either range in the last 30 days. Katietalk 17:57, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: This is the userpage of a now blocked user. The user's talk page was redirected to the userpage, meaning that messages to this user are now being placed on the userpage, where they do not belong. Protecting the userpage would solve this problem and save users the trouble of removing inappropriate material from the userpage. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 22:57, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
04 January 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Whitewashing by two IPs COI editing "We need to market the province for investment" admission Jim1138 (talk) 00:09, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:32, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incorrect edits from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 13:45, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:41, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Persistent disruptive editing - Laramie Dean, who was born under the name Jeremy Carignan, is a local living guitarist and, like several musicians, a member of Jehovah's Witnesses. An unregistered user (75.82.55.26) has repeatedly blanked out the information regarding his birth name and his religious affiliation, as well as the cited references, even to the point of claiming that The Portsmouth Herald is not real. Unregistered user - who has also ignored an edit war warning on their talk page on 2 January 2016 - may also be WP:SOCK of registered user "Surfpunk007" who has only one edit in their history. Wildwest1973 (talk) 01:49, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. It's one IP. Better to block them than lock the page. GedUK 13:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing long-term sneaky vandalism from multiple IPs. Viriditas (talk) 05:03, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK 13:17, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Babymissfortune 07:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined GedUK 13:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For almost 3 years, a persistent IP hopper has been appearing regularly to add blatantly false info in this article about versions of the attraction in theme parks where it never existed. He/she has been reverted over 20 times now by various editors. Lately this has come to represent nearly all of the article's editing activity. AtticusX (talk) 14:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:36, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The article was protected in 2009 by PMDrive1061 (now inactive). There was an AFL player by this name - I'll create the article once unprotected. Terlob (talk) 06:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Terlob: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:18, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, @Terlob: Create the article first in your userspace, then it can be moved over. GedUK 13:17, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated, unexplained removal of sourced info by multiple IP addresses. Arbor to SJ (talk) 08:00, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 13:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Own user subpage. Babymissfortune 09:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Lectonar.. GedUK 13:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by adding wrong results. Kante4 (talk) 10:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected. Until 26th January, which I think is after the tournament ends. GedUK 13:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:39, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Full protection: Multiple accusations of edit warring, a participating editor appears to also be editing while logged out. Note that this was first requested at WP:ANI by someone other than myself. After an editor reverted the request, I requested that he/she self-revert, but he/she refused [4]. Unscintillating (talk) 23:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 13:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Repeated BLP violations and vandalism related to politics. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 00:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 13:06, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is one of a few pages that WP:SOCK-master User:ArthurRebelnatico uses to get their sockpuppet autoconfirmed so that they can edit Sophia Abrahão. The last 10 edits on this page were self-reverts to get a sock autoconfirmed. Steel1943 (talk) 01:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Lectonar.. GedUK 13:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unsourced anon additions that need reverting . JMHamo (talk) 01:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 13:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Unsourced or improperly sourced additions to a BLP. This page has a lot of attention currently because of a new Netflix documentary and has generated some controversy. Some of the controversial information may ultimately be appropriate to be added to the page, but it should be done in a thoughtful manner which complies with Wikipedia's guidelines and that is not happening at the moment. Knope7 (talk) 04:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 13:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs due to countless rumors and unknown future of subject's career. MavsFan28 (talk) 04:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Lectonar.. GedUK 13:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of hoaxes by IP socks of Jimlantabanao. Sixth of March 04:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:33, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 13:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – New account and IP socks edit-warring adding unsourced content. Dr. K. 07:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 13:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Pages PC-protected by NeilN
- Martin O'Malley (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Kite (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- WGXA (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Cannibal (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Religious views of Adolf Hitler (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Charles & Keith (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Adam Ruins Everything (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Renew pending changes: NeilN hasn't responded; also, he has been off for at least seven days. --George Ho (talk) 00:16, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Not done Please re-file these individually, with an explanation as to why each one needs protecting again. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: Longtime shenanigans.VictoriaGraysonTalk 17:39, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Not done I don't know, this looks like a content dispute to me. They are removing what is arguably poorly sourced content and bringing their own sources with their edits. I see no attempt at discussion anywhere. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:50, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- List of Filipino films with over P100 million domestic gross (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users keep changing the numbers. Babymissfortune 05:41, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 06:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Babymissfortune 05:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; I propose of 2 weeks of semi-protection as this vandalism was caused by 2015 Metro Manila Film Festival that will end on January 7. Janbryan (talk) 17:42, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Militia occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary full-protection:Temporary semi-protection: Active news event on a contentious subject that has recently attracted multiple IP editors, some making sanitizing and non-helpful edits. Update1 - the sheer speed at which pro- and anti-militia IP editors are making edits to this article is essentially halting any meaningful work on it due to unending edit conflicts resulting from IP edits. Update2 - All work on this article has now ceased and regular editors are now working full-time to do reverts of destructive edits by IP editors and newly created SPAs. LavaBaron (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP and new users persistently adding in the future end date of the series in the television infobox, ahead of the show's finale date of January 10, writing as if the series has already ended, or entering unsourced content about the final two unaired episodes. MPFitz1968 (talk) 23:13, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:49, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerical vandalism from several IP and new users in the last week or so. Users provide no explanation for changing stats of songs' performances on the page, nor references to back their changes. Users appear to be changing stats for particular songs in the list (Green Day songs, specifically). MPFitz1968 (talk) 02:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Have discovered thru Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stumpwentz that three users named in that investigation, User:Stumpwentz, User:Grohlhole and User:Dirnt55, have edited the article similarly since late November, with intent to alter chart stats for Green Day songs, but providing no explanation or references. So, I'll add persistent sockpuppetry as reason for request. MPFitz1968 (talk) 20:45, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Beeblebrox: Thanks for the pending-changes protection, but shortly after you protected the article, there have been two different IP users who are vandalizing the article, and this thing could escalate into more vandalism. I hesitate to take any action on the IP users, but will revert the vandalism; they possibly are more sockpuppets of Stumpwentz which I mentioned above. I honestly don't think pending-changes will work with these vandals. MPFitz1968 (talk) 01:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Good point, PC was,maybe not the right tool for the job here.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: IP's discourage editors from improving article.VictoriaGraysonTalk 17:39, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:45, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent edit warring by IP editor to reword unsourced, unsubstantiated WP:RUMOR while refusing to engage in discussion. oknazevad (talk) 20:51, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:42, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Vandalism picked right back up again after previous protection expired. Taffe316 (talk) 22:47, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Temporary semi-protection: The subject of the article has linked to the article and is getting targeted by vandals. Curro2 (talk) 23:12, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:22, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:39, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 01:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of hoaxes by IP socks of TV5Ozamiz. - 112.198.79.66 (talk) 12:11, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection. Calicutspecialist (talk) 14:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- There is an ongoing inquest about this editor's relation and persistent vandalism to this article here:[5] Editor 2050 (talk) 14:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued insertion of link to a non-notable youtube review by IP users. Calidum T|C 15:02, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:00, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Protection for possible disruptive edits. Babymissfortune 03:24, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – The same vandalism for the last several months. Dismas|(talk) 03:28, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing - Michael Mansell is a living lawyer and activist of Aboriginal descent. Unregistered users have repeatedly blanked out the information about his ethnicity. Given the nature of Mansell's work as an Aboriginal activist, these disruptive edits can be considered to have a political or personally negative aspect. Ordinary Person (talk) 04:04, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:34, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Users/IP's making themselves directors and editors. MusaTalk ☻ 06:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
05 January 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – By an IP. Amaury (talk) 14:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. GedUK 15:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – By an IP. Amaury (talk) 14:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. GedUK 15:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: - IP vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:46, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:43, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Any chance of short term protection, IP hopper adding OR. Doug Weller talk 20:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:41, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still seems to be persistent vandalism. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 16:45, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:22, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent additions of rumors and unsourced content. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Block-evading IP legal threats again. McGeddon (talk) 18:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:32, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Talk:Militia occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Since the main page was protected, the Talk page has been inundated with IP editors and SPA accounts repeatedly requesting identical, or virtually identical, edits, which are being repeatedly declined. This, itself, would be fine, however, none of them sign their comments and generally insert them into random places on the page making it appear comments can be attributed to editors who had not written them and generally creating an almost impossible to follow flow of discussion in some parts. This situation appears to be increasing and it is rapidly becoming impossible to discuss edits to the page. GF editors have deleted consensus decisions simply because it's been impossible to identify anything in this mess. LavaBaron (talk) 18:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- I see the problem, but unfortunately I do not see how it could be helped. This is a long-time disruption, apparently caused by the attention of media three days ago, high traffic. We do not want to semi-protect a talk page for a month, and a day long protection will not help. Let us see what my admin colleagues say.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: What we could do is protect this page and setup an IP talk page. It's pretty unusual for an article talk page, but it might work. What we would need is a template announcement at the top of this talk page, but making templates is waaaaay beyond my skill set. Do you know anyone that could? GedUK 13:40, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Ged UK: I can make a template, no problem.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- I'm just going to throw in a +1 vote for this. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: Cool. There used to be one for user talk pages, but I can't find it. GedUK 14:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Ged UK: I was thinking about the template like on top of Talk:Kiev (the very first one). I am not aware of the existence of a dedicated template for protected talk pages.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter:Yeah, it might have been one an experienced user/admin made themselves for their page. Going back a good few years now. I can almost remember his name. Anyway, the Kiev one looks good, wording something like "This page is temporarily protected from non-logged in (IP) accounts and new user edits. Non-logged in accounts and new users can edit This page. This includes for edit requests.". Something like that. GedUK 14:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Ged UK: Great. For how long do we want to protect the talk page? One month?--Ymblanter (talk) 14:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: I'd say a week for now, hard to know how long this situation would last. I found the page, but it didn't have a template, just a message (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:SchuminWeb/Talk_active&oldid=345801595). GedUK 14:24, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Ged UK: Ok, let us protect if for a week. If no protection is needed after this one expires, we can always merge the IP talk page with the talk page archives. Will protect and set up the page now.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: I'd say a week for now, hard to know how long this situation would last. I found the page, but it didn't have a template, just a message (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:SchuminWeb/Talk_active&oldid=345801595). GedUK 14:24, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Ged UK: Great. For how long do we want to protect the talk page? One month?--Ymblanter (talk) 14:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: Cool. There used to be one for user talk pages, but I can't find it. GedUK 14:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- I'm just going to throw in a +1 vote for this. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, this can't be a long-term disruption as the article has only existed for 3 days (unless "long term" = 72 hours). LavaBaron (talk) 16:34, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, you are right, I did not express myself correctly.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:38, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Ged UK: I can make a template, no problem.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., set up the IP edit page, pls feel free to modify.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:38, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The newly created article Jon Ritzheimer is receiving the attention of IP editors and SPA accounts frustrated with their inability to edit Militia occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. Just to get ahead of the curve, note that, if this BLP were to be protected, it would most certainly cause said IP editors/SPAs to redirect their attention to the other linked BLPs Ryan Payne and Blaine Cooper. LavaBaron (talk) 16:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Please feel free to nominate other articles if they get attacked, we can not protect them pre-emptively.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:52, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple different IPs keep adding 2016 to the season 2 section heading despite the hidden note. nyuszika7h (talk) 17:06, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 17:10, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes - NeilN is away at the moment. George Ho did not list correctly previously. Re-doing request. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, a reason... Long-term vandalism during the time of pending changes. May be worth it to continue pending changes. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:53, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, Seems to have dropped back. Let's see what it's like unprotected. GedUK 12:11, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Usurping edit war Premier Badminton League v. Indian Badminton League. Complicated. Need to stop edit warring until the article can be split/remedied. Jim1138 (talk) 11:05, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Due to violation of Wikipedia is not a crystal ball policies users updating evictions and entries without an official statement. GSS (talk) 06:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC
Question: @GSS-1987: What are you asking for? Page is currently semi-protected, so lowering it to PC would only likely increase the activity. If there's issues with the people editing the page currently, speak to them, and if necessary report to WP:AIV. GedUK 13:41, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Ged, I have asked one of the user to stop adding unsourced information before it become official but s/he replied me this. I understand lowering the protection level to PC would increase the activity but also i think it can control the voilation of WP:CRYSTAL and vandalism. You can close this request for now if you feel it wont help and i will keep my eyes on the page for weekly eviction/entry updates if this continue i will surely go with WP:AIV. Thank You GSS (talk) 16:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, For the bot GedUK 12:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IP users who are attempting to revert edits are not citing sources when giving information. Someguywhat (talk) 06:28, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined. This is just one IP, and you and they are involved into a content dispute. I do not see a single message at the talk page, nor a single message of the talk page of the IP, meaning the dispute resolution yet has to start.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing, possibly also sockpuppetry. I recommend one week semi. Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I agree PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:55, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Gomada (talk) 12:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:51, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes - NeilN is away at the moment. George Ho did not list correctly previously. Re-doing request. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Persistant vandalism still continues at constant rate. May be worth it to continue pending changes. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes - NeilN is away at the moment. George Ho did not list correctly previously. Re-doing request. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Vandalism still continuing. Still some serious instances too. Such as that suppression of a revision. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:32, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes - NeilN is away at the moment. George Ho did not list correctly previously. Re-doing request. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Throughout pending changes, there was still a bit of vandalism at times but some good edits at other times. It may be worth it to just pending changes again. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection due to new editor/anon deleting content cited to reliable sources. I am a contributor to the article, so cannot apply the protection myself. —howcheng {chat} 00:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:34, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Page has been semi'ed for a content dispute for nearly three years now. Time to give it a chance at being unprotected; indef was probably wrong to begin with. Protecting admin is no longer an admin due to inactivity. jcgoble3 (talk) 09:34, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotected--Ymblanter (talk) 12:35, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes - NeilN is away at the moment. George Ho did not list correctly previously. Re-doing request. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Still long line of persistant but long-term vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes - NeilN is away at the moment. George Ho did not list correctly previously. Re-doing request. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Still constant long-term vandalism trend. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:23, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just recent persistent vandalism by some ips. Onel5969 TT me 02:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:14, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes - NeilN is away at the moment. George Ho did not list correctly previously. Re-doing request. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Still problems with the long-term vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Non resident Pakistanis vandalizing this page as the attack was on India and the attackers were Pakistanis. Semi-protect for one month. 223.176.13.113 (talk) 04:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Ongoing high level of IP vandalism. This is one of the most-read pages in Wikipedia (as Recent deaths) and it is usual to have ongoing semi-protection. WWGB (talk) 11:42, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:06, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite Pending Changes Protection: Extreme vandalism by a cult.VictoriaGraysonTalk 03:47, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:54, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 68.46.222.11 (talk · contribs) blocked by Jenks24. DMacks (talk) 07:49, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite Pending Changes Protection: Article blanking by a cult.VictoriaGraysonTalk 03:48, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 68.46.222.11 (talk · contribs) blocked by Jenks24. DMacks (talk) 07:49, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent event has IPs continuously vandalising and adding POV statements. . Dr. K. 10:50, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism picked right back up again after previous protection was lifted. Taffe316 (talk) 20:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:25, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism, plus come recent vandalism too. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 22:20, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Is brother target to Police. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 22:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:27, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - 112.198.77.39 (talk) 07:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:33, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit-warring from dynamic IPs in violation of WP:ARBMAC2 and WP:MOSMAC. Dr. K. 10:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:31, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To much vandalism and unsourced edits for pending changes. Qed237 (talk) 19:49, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Obviuosly now, once he was appointed head coach of Real Madrid, there is a lot of vandalism, but it will subside in a week, and the pending changes are still there.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:35, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection:indefinitely Since November 2015, Blanking of the article by IPs and unconfirmed users continues. No constructive edits by IP or unconfirmed users. Semi-protected edit request is suffice for this article.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 08:14, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 08:23, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeated creation of promotional and copyrighted material. MJ94 (talk) 08:24, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- :
Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This article seems to have a long history of IPs adding huge amounts of unsourced, in-universe cruft, but the new film has created a renewed interest by persistent cruftophiles. — TAnthonyTalk 16:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - 112.198.77.39 (talk) 07:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Nakon full protected the page a day or so ago in response to my request. The editors involved, including me, have reached an agreement on the talk page as to how to proceed. The page can be unprotected now. Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 20:27, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotected Ymblanter (talk) 08:05, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism — Continuous changes to artist roster; TODOs being ignored. Valkyrino (talk) 15:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 07:33, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wish to have indef semi restored. It was changed to full protection after edit war but not woth that gone, it should be semi again. . Qed237 (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. DMacks (talk) 07:37, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Full Protection: I've just created a re-direct of Cheri Dinovo (the third "n" is lower-cased) and I'm just wondering if you can fully protect that page so that it will always redirect to Cheri DiNovo (the real article has the third "N" being uppercased). Furthermore, I want to avoid future vandalism to that redirect. Thanks! Tibbydibby (talk) 20:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Tibbydibby: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Full protection is extreme and pages are not normally pre-emptively protected, but in light of the circumstances I have
Semi-protected the redirect to match the article. BethNaught (talk) 21:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 01:47, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Already done. Katietalk 03:38, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This seems to be a target for sockpuppeter User:Fangusu. The previous edits consisted of edits from User:DJ Autagirl (a confirmed sock of Fangusu) and an IP (which I just reverted.). Steel1943 (talk) 02:16, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 03:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This seems to be a target for sockpuppeter User:Fangusu. The previous edits consisted of edits from User:DJ Autagirl (a confirmed sock of Fangusu) and an IP (which I just reverted.). Steel1943 (talk) 02:31, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 03:31, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 17:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Again, Илья Драконов this seems like good-faith editing? Have you tried talking to them? — MusikAnimal talk 18:44, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- 2 users tried to speak with him, he just does not listen and continues to do his "job". I do not know what to do with his edits. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 18:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC).
Indefinite semi-protection: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_3#General_Prohibition. nableezy - 22:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC) 22:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hey hey hey, it does say pages may be protected by pending changes as well. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 22:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected BethNaught (talk) 22:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Whoops, didn't look at the history. Indeed you are right, Nableezy. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:06, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: There is a draft article that looks competent that I wish to accept at WP:AFC, see Draft:Chicken Island (Guangdong). If you disagree please let me know on my talk page why I am mistaken. Fiddle Faddle 18:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Timtrent, maybe fix your references to give reference information in more English? Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 22:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Qwertyxp2000: They are not my references. I am assuming they suffice since we do not require references to be in English. On that basis I wish to accept the Articles for Creation draft. I care, but not enough to make a strong argument for it. We accept drafts if they stand, in our view, a better than 60% chance of surviving an immediate deletion process I believe it does. Your mileage may vary. Fiddle Faddle 22:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotected by RHaworth. BethNaught (talk) 22:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Timtrent: Okay, I understand. Good luck for your Chicken Island submission. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you both. I have accepted it and it must now take its chance. That is what AfC is all about Fiddle Faddle 23:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Timtrent: Okay, I understand. Good luck for your Chicken Island submission. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Offensive name – The page name needs to be more descriptive. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined I'm convinced the user manually typed this in, and is unlikely to be recreated. Either way I don't see how it's offensive — MusikAnimal talk 18:41, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 17:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One IP edit in the past 8 months, and appears to have been made in good-faith — MusikAnimal talk 18:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 17:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined This is certainly disruptive, but only one IP involved so I've warned them. I realize it's the same IP in the above two requests, which is why you should sufficiently warn/talk to them to try find out what's going on — MusikAnimal talk 18:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 17:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — MusikAnimal talk 18:48, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Goes along with Daim DN, which has been protected. And now a new editor has posted a note to my talk page protesting that the article should exist, so I'm guessing he tried to create Daim DN again, only to find it protected, and may try to create it at Daim Dn as well. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. A block is in order if disruption continues from this user — MusikAnimal talk 18:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Dan56 (talk) 22:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 22:40, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Wikipedia is not a newspaper, so far an A380 order hasn't been confirmed by any reliable source. The sources provided are only about rumours concerning a potential order in the future. SideshowBob7 (talk) 15:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined Doesn't look that out of hand. Please use the talk page — MusikAnimal talk 18:37, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent, obsessive and politically-motivated changes to the nationality of the subject (versus their ethnicity) by multiple single-purpose IPs. Multiple and months-long attempts to explain the difference between Turkish nationality and Kurdish ethnicity have been fruitless (language issues?). Please consider permanent semi-protection, but at least renew the temporary protection previously applied to this article. General Ization Talk 20:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I can't say I'm comfortable indef protecting at this point. I will keep it on my watchlist. BethNaught (talk) 21:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: It is an election year, which means one or more anonymous editors are trying to list an organization that has been repeatedly rejected as an article. As a new tactic, one editor tried to apply a style to give a non-link the appearance of an article link. Requesting semi-protection, if possible until mid November. TechBear | Talk | Contributions 20:36, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 11 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is escalating: the same behaviour was occurring before the previous application of protection. BethNaught (talk) 21:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
06 January 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Eric444 (talk) 17:52, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., should do the job.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:31, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – So many reverts lately since semi-protection. George Ho (talk) 18:01, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too frequently edited at the time for pending changes.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:33, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Silly vandalism campaign with mix of IPs and new accounts. Getting slightly difficult to track, real editors accidentally restoring vandalized versions, etc etc etc.Thanks! . DBaK (talk) 19:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 1 registered account also blocked. BethNaught (talk) 19:43, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP on controversial commentator is repeatedly the target of IPs adding unsourced defamatory material. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 21:33, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:43, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP vandalism. Jamie Tubers (talk) 12:44, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, It's one IP. Warn again, then report to WP:AIV if they continue. GedUK 13:42, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection for a longer period please. Target of IP disruption continuously removing genres as well as target of sockpuppetry. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 13:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK 13:43, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: From remove protection. --112.78.117.68 (talk) 13:15, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, GedUK 13:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:55, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:24, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The last 50 edits show 10 instances of drive-by editing, disruptive editing, or vandalism that needed to be reverted. Temporary semi-protection (one year long) was tried in 2013, and does not appear to have fixed the problem. This is a highly visible article, and vandalism is thus even more troublesome. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:08, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent addition of unsourced opinion related content due to recent events. DVdm (talk) 16:28, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 16:33, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: Persistent vandalism – protected by NeilN. George Ho (talk) 05:07, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:30, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Nakon 05:47, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: Persistent vandalism – administrator very busy in real life. George Ho (talk) 05:13, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:30, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Nakon 05:48, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: Some reverts; administrator in school. --George Ho (talk) 05:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @George Ho: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:30, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:45, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Nakon 05:50, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Editing very low, but edits by IP have been reverted within the past month or so. George Ho (talk) 06:01, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 06:10, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Escape from Tomorrow (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Declined This is just one user, and they have been warned. If they continue after warning, they should be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:18, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: A shifting IP has been edit warring over including inappropriate references in the lede for the past week. McGeddon (talk) 09:28, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:33, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: Almost stable, but there has been vandalism. NeilN is still on the break. --George Ho (talk) 04:57, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:00, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined Two unaccepted edits in the last three weeks. Katietalk 05:05, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: High level of IP and user. 112.78.117.68 (talk) 05:43, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Both users have been blocked. Nakon 05:51, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thomas Jefferson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- James K. Polk (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: Please unprotect both articles for non users to edit. 75.141.110.181 (talk) 03:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Both are pretty high profile and frequent targets for IP vandals. I'll ping Yunshui, who protected Jefferson way back in 2012--and how nice and quiet it's been since then... Drmies (talk) 04:06, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Drmies: Yunshui retired from Wikipedia, and hasn't edited once since that announcement, so I'm not sure a response on this is likely.
--IJBall (contribs • talk) 08:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Drmies: Yunshui retired from Wikipedia, and hasn't edited once since that announcement, so I'm not sure a response on this is likely.
- Polk seems pretty quiet and stable, so it's
Unprotected. Jefferson is a whole different kettle of fish – the registered editors are whacking at each other on a daily basis – so I'm going to decline unprotection there. Katietalk 05:12, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Polk seems pretty quiet and stable, so it's
- Automated comment: @KrakatoaKatie: One or more pages in this request have not been unprotected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:30, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Not done Thomas Jefferson, for the bot. Nakon 05:53, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Katietalk 04:58, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term problem with spambots adding links to a variety of different domains. This article is extremely low traffic, so the spam is often not seen or addressed properly. Here are some examples:
- [6] by User:J34542121
- [7] by User:J34542121
- [8] by User:J345421
- [9] by User:J345421
- [10] by User:Ibs3709
- [11] by User:Ibs3709
- [12] by User:Ibs3709
- [13] by User:Ibs3709
- [14] by User:Xfactormedia
- [15] by User:Medicontributor
- [16] by User:Medicontributor
- [17] by User:Medicontributor
- [18] by User:Medicontributor
- [19] by User:Medicontributor
Indefinite semi-protection would address these problems without limiting any other productive edits in the past year (and more). Thanks. — Jess· Δ♥ 02:53, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Otherwise, protection isn't justified for an article that hadn't been edited since November 13. Katietalk 04:55, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 04:05, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2604:2000:f643:3e00::/64 blocked 48 hours for edit warring/3RR violation (this is one guy with a dynamic IPv6 address). Katietalk 04:52, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits, made IP's and unconfirmed users. LLArrow (talk) 01:23, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 05:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: Persistent vandalism – administrator not active at the moment. George Ho (talk) 05:11, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:30, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 05:48, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: So many reverts; protected by NeilN. --George Ho (talk) 05:15, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @George Ho: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:30, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:45, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 05:49, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: Some reverts, even after semi-protection ended. Protected by NeilN. George Ho (talk) 05:19, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @George Ho: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:30, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:45, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 05:50, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Either page protection or user blocks would be helpful. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Colinburke8 (talk · contribs) blocked by UkPaolo. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:27, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CatcherStorm talk 21:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:23, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same as request for Days of Our Lives above. livelikemusic talk! 23:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Done by 5 albert square. BethNaught (talk) 23:47, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of referenced content that equates the lingam with a phallus. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 15:31, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined. This is just one IP, who has not yet been warned. If they continue edit-warring after warning, please ask at WP:AIV or WP:3RRN.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:46, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Upgrade page protection. Current page protection does not appear to stop vandals. Rhumidian (talk) 18:10, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of `1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 23:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: User is globally locked, so there's no reason for any future edits to this page. Andrew327 20:56, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Only harassed by 1 IP so far. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks! Andrew327 21:40, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Janbryan (talk) 21:48, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 5 albert square (talk) 23:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Janbryan (talk) 21:48, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 5 albert square (talk) 23:24, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock-hopping IP of blocked editor Wingard continuing to make disruptive edits to episode counts, despite ignoring policies and consensus; same pattern caused two previous protections, and current protection at The Bold and the Beautiful. livelikemusic talk! 23:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 5 albert square (talk) 23:28, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
07 January 2016
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Vipinhari || talk 14:27, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:41, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Concerted effort by multiple IP's to label, rename, or otherwise plaster "Traitor" on the character bio. Scr★pIronIV 20:54, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note The article on the actor who portrays Finn, John Boyega, received similar persistent vandalism and has already had to be protected. Suggest at least a week for Finn as well. Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:59, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 21:16, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Edit-warring. Dat GuyTalkContribs 21:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:45, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: This page has consistently been edited by IP users over the last few years which has seen a lot of spammy type stuff added to the page. I realise that this is a small and relatively unimportant page but Page Protection would help. 2016 is their 175th year and I anticipate that this will mean a lot of spammy type editing . Gbawden (talk) 12:58, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sorry, but there's nothing like the level's of vandalism, or even editing, to warrant protection at this stage. If it increases over the year, please feel free to relist. GedUK 13:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection for one or two months: Several vandalism has been done to the page by various IP addresses, including removal of infobox. Daerl (talk) 13:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some vandalism from multiple IPs occurring the past few weeks. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Drmies.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by dubious accounts, removing authenticated information.Jakaidiot (talk) 08:30, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Deryck C. 10:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced content by IPs. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 08:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Deryck C. 10:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs and users. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 15:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 16:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Mickey Rooney
Please protect the page to stop the edit war. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.228.230.203 (talk) 21:45, January 6, 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: Error in Template:Reply to: Username not given. This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:48, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Cyberbot I: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined. Why do not you go to the talk page and discuss before you both get blocked for massive edit-warring.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:32, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent BLP violations by socks of determined maligner of the subject. RolandR (talk) 13:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Bbb23. Katietalk 14:30, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anons continue to apply a transfer (trade) rumour to this article while no firm source exists. A week-long lock might help with the problem. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:33, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, BLP violations, obvious block evasion. Requesting protection for the second time in the last two days. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:48, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Having reviewed the recent edit history and the last protection request, I think a short period of protection is appropriate now. Deryck C. 10:58, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent promotional edits and copyright violations by multiple new accounts. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:20, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for 2 days to let things cool down a bit. The article has been reverted to the last edit before today's editing dispute. Deryck C. 11:00, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism resumed immediately after previous block expired. Suggest a longer block. Jeh (talk) 11:56, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:14, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes persistent vandalism by an ip-transient. Debouch (talk) 03:34, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Pending changes generally aren't used for pages with high edit traffic (a few edits a week or more). Deryck C. 10:36, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MusaTalk ☻ 06:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 10:39, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some people keep adding wrong information in favor of their team. Ben5218 (talk) 09:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 10:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This shn is getting ridiculous . Digifan23 (talk) 23:46, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There is no level of frustration that permits you to abuse another editor like you did in your edit summary. It's been hidden. Don't do it again. Katietalk 00:58, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection – persistent vandalism, mostly from IPs who are, incredibly, confusing an actor with his character. Bretonbanquet (talk) 01:30, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:34, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Drmies.. --Deryck C. 10:34, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: POV edits by multiple IPs Jim1138 (talk) 07:33, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:27, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Apparently, this page is now a target of anon IP socks of User:Fangusu. Also, their confirmed and now-blocked sock, User:DJ Autagirl, has edited the page in the past days. Steel1943 (talk) 22:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Mike V • Talk 00:36, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of an IP sock of User:Fangusu. Steel1943 (talk) 22:33, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Mike V • Talk 00:36, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Newbiepedian (Hailing Frequencies) 23:12, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Mike V • Talk 00:40, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EricEnfermero (Talk) 03:40, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:41, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. I am the creator of this article and the subject is particularly controversial and debated in Brazil, some people are hateful of him, please add a semi protection so there will be no more vandalism. Marcosoldfox (talk) 18:22, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes. Persistent unconstructive edits from IP users, with some relevant edits. The current SNL season page is frequently visited until the season ends in May (pending changes previously expired in late December). Requesting pending changes, preferably until June 1. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:20, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Wait and see if it increases (not enough at the moment), don't hold this decline against a future credible request. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:42, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 22:27, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 22:33, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:35, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amortias (T)(C) 23:41, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 00:54, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mutt Lunker (talk) 00:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
08 January 2016
Temporary pending changes: There is an IP Address that is always contributing to the work. We have tried to adjust his Arabic Script spelling on our work several times. However, when I was ill several days ago. The page got out of our control. He removed all our adjustments to his edits and continued to make serious faults when writing Tunisian Arabic using Arabic Script although some of his edits are excellent. We just ask if you could protect the page from the edits of this user for several days so that we can correct all his faults. --Csisc (talk) 16:15, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined I don't see any attempt to engage or even warn this IP about his disruption. If you've got a problem with his editing, discuss it with him. Katietalk 16:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: There is an IP Address that is always contributing to the work. We have tried to adjust his Arabic Script spelling on our work several times. However, when I was ill several days ago. The page got out of our control. He removed all our adjustments to his edits and continued to make serious faults when writing Tunisian Arabic using Arabic Script although some of his edits are excellent. We just ask if you could protect the page from the edits of this user for several days so that we can correct all his faults. --Csisc (talk) 16:15, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined See associated request. No discussion or engagement with IP at all. Katietalk 16:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by a series of IPs since early December. Constantine ✍ 16:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 16:39, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A user edit warring and coming up with a new IP all time. Capitals00 (talk) 16:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Katietalk 16:39, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism, a consensus was reached but some editors (and possibly sock accounts) keep reverting. ~ Elias Z. (talkallam) 08:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Question: Since this concerns a content dispute, I will consider full-protection but semi-protection would be inappropriate. Please also consider inviting further opinions from WP:3O. Deryck C. 10:52, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined Seems to have stopped. Let us know if it resumes. Katietalk 14:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced material to a WP:BLP by IP editors. TriiipleThreat (talk) 10:27, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- I've warned all IP editors involved. I'll consider protection or blocking if the low-quality edits continue.
Checking to see if protection is necessary. Deryck C. 10:45, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Deryck Chan: Can we close this one now? GedUK 12:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Ged UK: I'd give it another 16 hours or so (24h from most recent edit). If nothing happens then we can close this as no action required. (Or is it not okay to wait?) Deryck C. 18:38, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Deryck Chan: I'd usually decline it and ask them to relist it, otherwise we end up with the RFPP page cluttered with limbo requests. GedUK 12:37, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Ged UK: I'd give it another 16 hours or so (24h from most recent edit). If nothing happens then we can close this as no action required. (Or is it not okay to wait?) Deryck C. 18:38, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Deryck Chan: Can we close this one now? GedUK 12:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined No edits in 24 hours. Let us know if disruption resumes. Katietalk 14:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi protection: Persistent vandalism. Once again, IP-hopper keeps adding fake movie titles at the expense of actual, cited films.Crboyer (talk) 19:40, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Deryck C. 20:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Has received a high level of IP vandalism over a long period of time. Elisfkc (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not really high at all. GedUK 12:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated strange edits that serve no purpose. The Banner talk 17:47, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:07, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:15, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection If I'm reading the log correctly, this talk page appears to have been semi-protected (with no expiration) more than five years ago. Per WP:PP, "Talk pages are not usually protected, and are only semi-protected for a limited duration in the most severe cases of vandalism." 63.116.31.198 (talk) 17:44, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotected Looks like the same thing happened back in April 2015, where protection settings got carried over from a page move. The talk page was unprotected prior to that, so safe to say it was inadvertent — MusikAnimal talk 18:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring at the moment, not sure myself who is right or wrong, though. Poepkop (talk) 15:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, It's not quite at edit war level yet, it seems to have stopped. Relist if necessary GedUK 12:39, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Discussion has just commenced. An editor jumped in and claimed consensus where there clearly is none. John from Idegon (talk) 10:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:00, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every third edit is sexually graphic vandalism. This is a Featured Article (FA) that gets a lot of eyeballs on it. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk}
14:12, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from new account (quite possibly socks). RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:13, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 14:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism. Currently linked from ITN on the main page. sst✈ 14:44, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit rate is WAY too high for pending changes. Katietalk 14:53, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. MusaTalk ☻ 06:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit count is way too high for PC. GedUK 12:55, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Hollyckuhno (talk) 11:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 13:08, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism by ip editors . Onel5969 TT me 12:46, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 13:10, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- List of Virtual Console games for Wii U (North America) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-running edit war with anon users attempting to add content with a source that has been deemed unreliable. Attempt to start conversation on talk page has been unheeded. McDoobAU93 21:21, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Long history of being vandalized. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 03:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:47, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full-protection: potential edit war with an editor who unilaterally moves the page and makes controversial edits without actually reacting Talk page messages. Borsoka (talk) 06:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. GedUK 12:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs. Likely same person Jim1138 (talk) 07:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 08:13, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still disruption going on with IPs removing sourced genres to introduce unsourced content. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 15:27, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:36, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined - The disputing editor seems to have given up after the most recent warning. Closing as protection not needed anymore. Deryck C. 00:25, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep vandalizing the article. Jamie Tubers (talk) 21:27, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:09, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dunno what's going on, but there has been a rash of vandalism from multiple accounts and IPs. Altamel (talk) 04:13, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, I figured out what happened. The page was semi-protected until January 6, and within five hours of the expiration, the vandalism started up again. Better increase the protection length this time around. Altamel (talk) 04:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:24, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Myasuda (talk) 04:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:25, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Please undo [20] and revert to stable version. Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:39, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for 3 days. Erm, seriously, you're edit-warring about the word "winningest"? Deryck C. 00:47, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- It's standard American English. Its used on 3 Featured Articles (2005 ACC Championship Game, 2008 Orange Bowl, Roberto Luongo), 3 Featured Lists and 9 Good Articles. It isn't slang. The fact is it grates on the the British ear, and I'm sorry about that. To me this is an issue about WP:RETAIN. When Americans change 'petrol' to 'gasoline" because they think petrol sounds pompous like Little Lord Fauntleroy, I revert it for the same reasons. We can't allow Americans to slowly replace UK English with American, nor vice versa. WP:RETAIN keeps the peace. The Harley-Davidson XR-750 is very American, in a very American sport and our sources use the same language we see on the American football Featured Articles. And a Canadian hockey article too.
If it wasn't an MOS:ENGVAR issue I'd let it go. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 00:54, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- It's not an ENGVAR (nationality) issue. It's a formality issue. The American Heritage Dictionary [21], Oxford dictionaries [22], and dictionary.com [23] all show "winningest" as "informal". Informal language is fine for a sports column but per WP:TONE,"Wikipedia articles, and other encyclopedic content, should be written in a formal tone." Per dictionary references, "Winningest" is not formal. That other articles here use it is an other stuff exists argument, possibly the most derided argument on Wikipedia. The correct action in this case is to remove the word from the other articles unless they're using it in direct quotes. Jeh (talk) 01:39, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- These articles are not "stuff". The consensus established by 3 FAs, 3 FLs and 9 GAs is that the word is acceptable as American English, and it is very accurate because it describes a very specific thing -- the most wins, nothing more or less -- which alternatives like "successful" fail to do. The precedent established by all these Featured and Good pages should be respected. We're talking about a great deal of scrutiny by many, many seasoned editors. Why not go and change all those other articles first and then come tell me the word isn't allowed? If this is really not an ENGVAR issue then fine, forget it, but that's why I'm pushing it. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 01:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- What absolute rubbish. Requesting full page protection to keep a nonsense word. "Winningest" is the sort of word found in advertising slogans, not reference works. --Pete (talk) 02:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- When you dismiss FAs and GAs that way, then you're saying Wikipedia consists of nothing more than "I just don't like it". Consensus now means nothing? We just spout opinions about what is rubbish and nonsense and don't look at dictionary sources or anything. Please go and change all those FAs and GAs first. (Hi Pete, fancy meeting you again.)
See Harley-Davidson XR-750 gets like 20k hits a year; it's practically unread. You go and remove all this "nonsense" and "rubbish" from those FAs and FLs and GAs, and a very large number of editors are going to be back in your face. And why? Nobody misunderstands "winningest"; it's pure WP:IJDLI. It's easy to pick on this one article but you know it won't stand scrutiny. It's just easier to score points on XR-750 and slink away without facing the implications. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- When you dismiss FAs and GAs that way, then you're saying Wikipedia consists of nothing more than "I just don't like it". Consensus now means nothing? We just spout opinions about what is rubbish and nonsense and don't look at dictionary sources or anything. Please go and change all those FAs and GAs first. (Hi Pete, fancy meeting you again.)
- What absolute rubbish. Requesting full page protection to keep a nonsense word. "Winningest" is the sort of word found in advertising slogans, not reference works. --Pete (talk) 02:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- These articles are not "stuff". The consensus established by 3 FAs, 3 FLs and 9 GAs is that the word is acceptable as American English, and it is very accurate because it describes a very specific thing -- the most wins, nothing more or less -- which alternatives like "successful" fail to do. The precedent established by all these Featured and Good pages should be respected. We're talking about a great deal of scrutiny by many, many seasoned editors. Why not go and change all those other articles first and then come tell me the word isn't allowed? If this is really not an ENGVAR issue then fine, forget it, but that's why I'm pushing it. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 01:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- It's not an ENGVAR (nationality) issue. It's a formality issue. The American Heritage Dictionary [21], Oxford dictionaries [22], and dictionary.com [23] all show "winningest" as "informal". Informal language is fine for a sports column but per WP:TONE,"Wikipedia articles, and other encyclopedic content, should be written in a formal tone." Per dictionary references, "Winningest" is not formal. That other articles here use it is an other stuff exists argument, possibly the most derided argument on Wikipedia. The correct action in this case is to remove the word from the other articles unless they're using it in direct quotes. Jeh (talk) 01:39, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- It's standard American English. Its used on 3 Featured Articles (2005 ACC Championship Game, 2008 Orange Bowl, Roberto Luongo), 3 Featured Lists and 9 Good Articles. It isn't slang. The fact is it grates on the the British ear, and I'm sorry about that. To me this is an issue about WP:RETAIN. When Americans change 'petrol' to 'gasoline" because they think petrol sounds pompous like Little Lord Fauntleroy, I revert it for the same reasons. We can't allow Americans to slowly replace UK English with American, nor vice versa. WP:RETAIN keeps the peace. The Harley-Davidson XR-750 is very American, in a very American sport and our sources use the same language we see on the American football Featured Articles. And a Canadian hockey article too.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent changing of a guest star in an upcoming episode (226) which goes against the source. Amaury (talk) 01:37, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 02:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Back in December half of the article was vandalized (IE naming Molly Rainford to Molly Wingwald and replacing correct names with incorrect etc etc, Well now protections up they've returned to again insert stupid/incorrect crap so as it's unlikely to ever stop I think indef's the best option, Thanks, . –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:24, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 02:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IPs seem to want to add extensive information on someone named Kim Domingo. GRuban (talk) 16:05, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 00:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject to consistent vandalism . TheWarOfArt (talk) 21:59, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 00:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Drovethrughosts (talk) 23:55, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 00:39, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and recurring target of vandalism and unsourced edits especially from children or trolls. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Done. Upgraded existing protection from pending changes to semi-protected with the same expiry date (6 Jan 2017). I think the edit volume is now too high for pending changes. Deryck C. 00:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 00:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Different IPs are coming in and vandalising the page. Dat GuyTalkContribs 20:31, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for 1 day to allow things to cool down a bit more. Come back for an extension if a different IP comes in to make unhelpful edits tomorrow. Deryck C. 00:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 23:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 00:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
09 January 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:55, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Question: I don't see anybody reverting any IP user - are you sure semi-protection is the right thing to ask for? Deryck C. 23:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 11:47, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism. Would like to curb the problem before it starts. CrashUnderride 19:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:13, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vandalism from confirmed accounts. I requested full protection yesterday and it was declined with a "users blocked" comment, but there seem to be plenty more. SPI was inconclusive, protection seems to be the only option left. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is completely insane. BethNaught (talk) 21:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent removal of reliable sources and pushing of fringe theories. 79616gr (talk) 07:14, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:57, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. one year. AlexiusHoratius 14:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The immense popularity and wide recognition of the subject has led to his article being extensively vandalised by both fans and haters. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:18, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Geohakkeri (talk) 14:13, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. - 112.198.101.157 (talk) 09:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined. This is just one IP, they have been warned and apparently stopped. If they resume under the same IP, pls file a WP:AIV request.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:54, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League finals (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 13:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:18, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Millard Fillmore (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Thomas Jefferson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: Please unprotect both articles for non users to edit. The user who protected Thomas Jefferson is no longer active. The user who protected Millard Fillmore has not been active for more than a while. 75.141.110.181 (talk) 00:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Not unprotected, please provide a rationale for unprotecting these articles. There has been substantial vandalism in the past which necessitated us to add protection to these two articles. I don't see any reason to remove the semiprotection at this time. Nakon 02:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism coming from IPs. The article had been temporary protected previously, but after the protection expired, vandalism keeps coming back in. Iamtheyeishow (talk) 5:54, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Again after the unprotection, page has been edited with again nonsensical grammar plus unsourced claims by anonymous ip addresses plus a now-blocked user. See the diffs [24], [25], [26], [27], [28] and [29]. Better to get a good protection from ip and nonsense editors. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 10:04, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 11:50, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Vandalism/incompetence caused issues with the Template:Infobox website as well as a number of other Infoboxes. CFCF 💌 📧 10:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- As a reasonably well-used redirect to a template-protected template, it has been
Template protected. BethNaught (talk) 10:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Only one day after the page was created, vandalism from three different IPs so far started vandalising the page. Dat GuyTalkContribs 10:20, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Seconded—azuki (talk · contribs · email) 10:33, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 11:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Already protected for BLP vandalism, now it's coming from autoconfirmed accounts. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 21:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Katietalk 22:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Well, the most recent one was blocked, but about seven other autoconfirmed accounts have also vandalized the article today. Full protection is a drastic measure but it might be unavoidable. I'll try to watch it in the hopes that full protection won't be necessary, but it's not looking good so far. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 01:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 02:04, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please either protect this page or block this sockpuppet IP. This is the second IP that site-banned editor Fangusu has used in the last 24 hours, so protection may be better warranted. Steel1943 (talk) 01:23, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 208.54.4.197 (talk · contribs) blocked by nakon (talk · contribs) Nakon 02:05, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I'll add a report to WP:BLPN as well. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 19:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined Disruption seems limited to a single user — MusikAnimal talk 20:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 23:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 02:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP and user vandalism by 118.1.138.55 and Wikisaichan. Anarchyte 00:40, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 02:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Vandalism and BLP violations. Jevansen (talk) 01:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 02:07, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Newbiepedian (talk · contribs · X! · logs) 18:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined With good edits coming through I think pending changes will do for now — MusikAnimal talk 20:09, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism that needs reverting. JMHamo (talk) 21:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 23:07, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism. JMHamo (talk) 23:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 23:12, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism including slander by a series of various IPs. Susangrigg1 (talk) 18:00, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined The heading here originally said Shelly Duvall, not sure if you meant that. Either way I think there is not enough recent disruption there or at Maronites to warrant semi at this time — MusikAnimal talk 18:13, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Yes its supposed to be Shelly Duvall. Thanks for looking into.Susangrigg1 (talk) 18:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edit vandalism returned once the prior semi expired. Geoff | Who, me? 21:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism . JMHamo (talk) 21:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Attack page spelling variant, no chance of a valid article . NeemNarduni2 (talk) 21:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:55, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Katietalk 22:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism from a few IPs. --allthefoxes (Talk) 22:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
10 January 2016
- Template:Songs category (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Songs category/core (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi protection: Highly visible template – 2951 transclusions. Armbrust The Homunculus 22:53, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article was recently protected for a period while there was some vandalism. The same individual appears to have returned after the protection has expired. Consider protecting article again please. Many thanks, Matthew Ferguson (talk) 13:13, 10 January 2016 (UTC). Matthew Ferguson (talk) 13:13, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated reversions over the reception section. CrashUnderride 18:23, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:19, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Done by Czar. BethNaught (talk) 21:23, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Jean Wyllys and Jair Bolsonaro
- Jean Wyllys (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Jair Bolsonaro (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent. Coltsfan (talk) 20:37, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Both
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 21:22, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Started up again immediately after protection release. IP editor even reverted a refused edit request on talk page. John from Idegon (talk) 21:17, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for 1 month this time. Deryck C. 21:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Template protection: Highly visible template – This template is both fully and cascade protected (through Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items), but at only 7000+ transclusions and considering that it doesn't appear to work by substitution or on specially sensitive pages, it seems like a prime candidate for template protection. The protecting administrator @Cbrown1023: does not appear to be regularly active so I am asking here, but pinging them anyway. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:52, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Done - Downgraded to indefinite template protection. Deryck C. 21:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Dan56 (talk) 05:10, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Template-editor protection highly visible template (over 100,000 transclusions). Frietjes (talk) 15:04, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:51, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please feel free to come back. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:57, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent racist derogatory about this black actor being an anime actor or character. Likely same person dynamic IPs. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:08, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:11, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and unsourced edits within past 24 hours despite repeated warnings. -- Whats new?(talk) 23:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator MelanieN. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:42, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sock/meatpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:41, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:44, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent and uncited "boyfriend" language. SlightSmile 02:59, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 14:48, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: An anonymous user is putting Undertale on the page with little to no valid sources. I request that Undertale be removed from the page and have the page be semi-protected to prevent this from happening again. 121.215.147.168 (talk) 03:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This appears to be edit warring involving IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. An attempt has been made to discuss on the talk page, so far with no response. MelanieN (talk) 14:58, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Release date and tracklist is not confirmed yet. Draft is in progress. (Draft:Digital Distortion). MusaTalk ☻ 06:36, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:45, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Unreferenced bio of non-notable person created four times in two days. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 13:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:47, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent addition of non-English content Dat GuyTalkContribs 14:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., the net result of these two days editing, almost exclusively by non-autoconfirmed users, was removal of clear garbage, not addition of it.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:05, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same pattern as before. DanielRigal (talk) 17:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:28, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Note: Page was protected by KrakatoaKatie at 19:13 UTC (after request was made). Adam talk - contribs 22:04, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Adi sco 93, can't you just write "already protected" after the note? Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 22:06, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- I thought I'd mention when the page was protected, since the bot picked it up. I'll just put "already protected" if I notice any others. Adam talk - contribs 22:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Adi sco 93, can't you just write "already protected" after the note? Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 22:06, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected (for the bot). tutterMouse (talk) 13:57, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Related Call of Duty pages tend to have high levels of IP vandalism. Prisencolin (talk) 08:10, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment - Maybe wait until there is like, say for example, twelve instances of vandalism by IPs. But yes, Call of Duty articles are such a target. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 09:19, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
A user who joined today has reverted this page in excess of 3 times to keep information about some Youtube video and a photograph of the apparent creator of the Youtube content on the page. 3 editors, including myself, have sought to revert the unconstructive user's edits with the editor each time reverting the edits.Stereorock (talk) 21:49, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Attempting to recorrect standard requesting of RFPP. He possibly means either semi-protection or full-protection. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 22:14, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.. Feel free to request further action if the vandalism continues. -- zzuuzz (talk) 05:49, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Edit-warring. We really need indef protection. An administrator has protected this article until December 30, and users have been reverting since. This might even qualify for temporary full protection. Dat GuyTalkContribs 09:08, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:17, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I installed pending changes, but please also make an effort to come to consensus at the talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:23, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: A user has started a discussion in the talk page, which I have replied to. I pinged the previous protecting administrator for discussion, feel free to join. Dat GuyTalkContribs 10:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Avatar 2
The page is being vandeled and trolled across especially in the music composer section. REquesting admins to revert back to a stable edit and protect it .Commons sibi (talk) 09:48, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Moved back into Draft space,
Semi-protected for 3 days by Materialscientist. tutterMouse (talk) 13:59, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @TutterMouse: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several fan based vandals are engaged in edit war. Please protect. SupernovaeIA (talk) 18:27, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the problems with autoconfirmed users should follow usual dispute resolution avenues.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:17, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Page was semi-protected for three days, but the disruptive editing from IPs resumed soon after the protection ended. StAnselm (talk) 18:46, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Second this request. The dynamic IP keeps coming back, won't discuss on talk, and won't accept compromise. ~Awilley (talk) 04:16, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Third this request. It's quite annoying - IP is being quite destructive, should definitely leave it to the confirmed acct's. MTG1989 talk 05:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Third this request. It's quite annoying - IP is being quite destructive, should definitely leave it to the confirmed acct's. MTG1989 talk 05:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced content and vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:26, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Extensive inappropriate IP edits. I started a discussion on the talk page but there has been no response and the IP edits continue. TypoBoy (talk) 14:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Rjd0060 (talk) 05:06, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Constant uncited additions and changes Serendipodous 14:55, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try pending changes--Ymblanter (talk) 09:13, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Creation protection: Page created three times in the space of a day. User may not be reading talk page messages. A short protection (I'd recommend 72 hours) should prevent the user from attempting to create the page again. As the title is not relevant to any potential article, a permanent protection could also be used. Adam talk - contribs 15:28, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, The creator (FaZeClan2013) has since been indef. blocked. If they evade and re-create the page, we'll be happy to block them. Rjd0060 (talk) 05:07, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. This has been going on for more than a year, so I ask for protection of similar duration. General Ization Talk 02:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 9 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 05:36, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:55, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently there is PC, however when I went to review some of the new edits I noticed that there is an excessive amount of users reverting IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. I think that simply semi-protection will be better. Dat GuyTalkContribs 13:25, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (PC also removed) Rjd0060 (talk) 05:05, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CrashUnderride 22:46, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:14, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Armbrust The Homunculus 02:33, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 03:32, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:15, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 05:27, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Impending controversy/spam posts as a result of a controversial penalty in CIN/PIT Wild Card game. Knowing what will happen, a 48 hour protection should suffice - it'll blow over by then. Thanks MTG1989 talk 05:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 05:26, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Weak submissions and occasional vandalism. The popularity of the subject has resulted in some extensive edits, mainly personal opinions. Therefore losing quality and the 'good article' tag. TF Munat (talk) 07:38, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 22:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a month. Acalamari 22:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Millard Fillmore (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Thomas Jefferson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: Please unprotect both articles for non users to edit. The user who protected Thomas Jefferson is no longer active. The user who protected Millard Fillmore has not been active for more than a while. 75.141.110.181 (talk) 19:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:28, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined Has been declined earlier, I do not see what changed.Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
11 January 2016
Indefinite semi-protection: WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 18:43, 11 January 2016 (UTC) 18:43, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: I'm not sure if this is appropriate considering I'm requesting protection of a user page, but this page has been the subject of significant IP sockpuppetry. It's also worth noting that the sockmaster, User:Alexiulian25, has had their talk page access revoked. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected by Yamaguchi. BethNaught (talk) 21:46, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Repeated "jokes" based on lyrics from Hamilton (musical) are getting tedious. Wish we could convert some of that energy into actually improving the article :/ Suspect it will have to become permanent (at least until Hamilton is off Broadway) but we should try temporary first, I think? —Luis (talk) 19:27, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A brief spell to start with. BethNaught (talk) 21:53, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- David Zowie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- David Bowe (actor) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism due to recent dead of David Bowie DVdm (talk) 15:53, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined both – David Zowie vandalism was mostly just a single IP user, whom has since been blocked, so the problems there should be solved. Other one might just be a harmless misunderstanding and activity doesn't warrant a protection at this time (last edit, at the time of this comment, was over 6 hours ago). ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:18, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated ongoing vandalism from multiple IPs and SPAs today. -- ferret (talk) 19:22, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Done by another admin. BethNaught (talk) 21:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism today, with several editors, (or one editor with several log-ins) adding nonsense.Flami72 (talk) 20:14, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 21:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Melonkelon (talk) 21:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 21:35, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Melonkelon (talk) 21:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 21:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content – 112.198.101.5 (talk) 13:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:58, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content – 112.198.101.5 (talk) 13:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content – 112.198.101.5 (talk) 13:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content – 112.198.101.5 (talk) 13:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content – 112.198.101.5 (talk) 13:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content – 112.198.101.5 (talk) 13:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content – 112.198.101.5 (talk) 13:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content – 112.198.101.5 (talk) 13:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content – 112.198.101.5 (talk) 13:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:01, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content – 112.198.101.5 (talk) 13:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:01, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continued removal of sourced information by IP SchroCat (talk) 14:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:08, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – There have been reverts since semi-protection ended before New Year's Eve. But there have been also good edits. George Ho (talk) 00:37, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a handful of disruptive edits since the semi-protection expired, nothing that can be handled on a heavily watched (604 people) page. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Several vandalizing IPs after creating article just a week ago. Ilovetopaint (talk) 04:34, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Only two of the IPs appear malicious and the edits are relatively infrequent. If this continues, however, feel free to make another request for protection. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:44, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Anonymous IPs and registered (non-autoconfirmed) users vandalizing a dozen times in a day. Hugely disruptive to maintaining the article. Zamaster4536 (talk) 05:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes protection would do just fine as well, perhaps preferable in this case, thank you. Zamaster4536 (talk) 07:14, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:46, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A few days ago the page would have warranted protection, in my opinion, but malicious activity appears to have subsided recently. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:53, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Extend semi-protection: It was temporarily semi-protected (a few hours) due to an apparent death hoax. This has been confirmed, so if it is unprotected, traffic will be high. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 07:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- I'd say to probably keep protection (if protection is needed) for a few weeks, high profile deaths are usually a magnet for bad faith edits. tutterMouse (talk) 07:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:51, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Pages are not protected preemptively.--Jetstreamer Talk 16:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- It's not pre-emptive, currently it is protected and while it's for a different reason right now, allowing the protection to lapse is just asking for a wave of unhelpful edits. tutterMouse (talk) 16:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Done Given the extremely high profile nature of the article at present coupled with its history of vandalism incidents (protection log shows 6 prior incidents requiring edit protection), I've extended the semi-protection to three days. Protection now expires at 17:28 UTC on January 14. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- It's not pre-emptive, currently it is protected and while it's for a different reason right now, allowing the protection to lapse is just asking for a wave of unhelpful edits. tutterMouse (talk) 16:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Pages are not protected preemptively.--Jetstreamer Talk 16:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow moving edit-war currently in progress; 6 reverts in 3 days. . Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: constant edit-warring and vandalism from IPs and some registered users. Katzenlibrary (talk) 16:36, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Update: Vandal edits have garnered social media attention from people (a) believing them and (b) criticizing the reliability of Wikipedia for featuring clearly false information. I believe the need for indefinite protection is evidence by this, especially since vandalism does not stop after protection is lifted.Katzenlibrary (talk) 16:58, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page. CFCF 💌 📧 14:27, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Katietalk 17:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated Star Wars vandalism. The Banner talk 12:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page. CFCF 💌 📧 14:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 14:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High vandalism, target because of today's Google doodle. Breawycker (talk to me!) 14:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent additions of unsourced content – Fan cruft IPs persistently adding false chart positions. Abi-Maria (talk) 15:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:15, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Introduction of incorrect factual error to a BLP from a dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 15:58, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not much can really be done to stop serial vandals like this (dealing with a similar issue in the meteorology realm of Wiki) but protected to try and stop the bleeding, at least temporarily. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:38, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not see any indications that vandalism would subsist before the tournament is over.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:03, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition by numerous IPs of unsourced information to BLP. Egghead06 (talk) 07:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:49, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Page is re-created either with no content or with no source. check deletion log. Needs to get Salted. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 12:56, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:51, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism/joke edits from Anon IPs. I call the big one bitey (talk) 19:43, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 03:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Ongoing disruptive edits. Article has previously been semi-protected for 6 months. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:36, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 06:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Highly visible template. Many transclusions or substitutions. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 09:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, BLP violations. 73.159.24.89 (talk) 00:56, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Many users are posting that the subject has died, when in fact it is an unrelated Ashley Olsen who died. See e.g. CNN. /wiae /tlk 02:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A content dispute about the lede is going on. Instead of discussing their edits everyone is just implementing them and the stability of this article has gone into red. There is no vandalism to be frank, just well meaning editors who are trigger happy. I would like admins to gold lock this as a courtesy so that this does not escalate into a battle. Please be kind enough to lock for 15 days as discussion can be long drawn out. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Over two weeks on a high profile article is a bit long.) AlexiusHoratius 03:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Jahan Shah (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Iranian Azerbaijanis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Khoy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP in top of the 3 articles.--SaməkTalk 06:17, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined Warned user about edit warring. Zero warnings = zero admin actions — MusikAnimal talk 22:37, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Dunno if you guys will bite on this, but a series of IP's have been insisting upon adding a DOB to this BLP without proper (or, really, any) sourcing, most likely due to the recent premiere of her TV show. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:57, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:18, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – NFL coach who is still officially with one team (CIN) but had interviews with two other teams (CLE and SF) today, creating a flurry of unsourced activity among overexcited fans. EricEnfermero (Talk) 00:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:44, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 22:26, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 17:19, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 22:28, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zappa24Mati 21:54, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 22:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
12 January 2016
Semi-protection: Ongoing vandalism. Previous semi-protection was for 3 months. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:46, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Lectonar. Katietalk 19:16, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Ongoing vandalism by IPs. Previous semi-protection was only one week. I would like a request for nine months. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 04:05, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 19:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP socks of JeSuisBilly. 112.198.102.184 (talk) 11:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP socks of JeSuisBilly. 112.198.102.184 (talk) 11:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP socks of JeSuisBilly. 112.198.102.184 (talk) 11:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP socks of JeSuisBilly. 112.198.102.184 (talk) 11:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP socks of JeSuisBilly. 112.198.102.184 (talk) 11:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP socks of JeSuisBilly. 112.198.102.184 (talk) 11:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP socks of JeSuisBilly. 112.198.102.184 (talk) 11:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP socks of JeSuisBilly. 112.198.102.184 (talk) 11:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP socks of JeSuisBilly. 112.198.102.184 (talk) 11:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP socks of JeSuisBilly. 112.198.102.184 (talk) 11:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP socks of JeSuisBilly. 112.198.102.184 (talk) 11:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP socks of JeSuisBilly. 112.198.102.184 (talk) 11:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP socks of JeSuisBilly. 112.198.102.184 (talk) 11:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple unreliable english tabloids stating a move to Liverpool and other clubs. Premature edits. Requesting semi-protection for 3 weeks. Shreerajtheauthor (talk) 17:24, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 19:14, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Requesting temporary semi High level of IP vandalism on account of WP:RECENT. Getting caned. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 19:09, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High traffic article because of new film, consistent IP vandalism. — TAnthonyTalk 01:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:53, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Extreme vandalism. DVdm (talk) 15:29, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Done by BethNaught for a period of 1 week. After 1 week the protection will automatically expire. Nyttend (talk) 16:10, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's are vandalizing the Scott Mills article and now everything to do with Radio 1 apparently..., Thanks,. –Davey2010Talk 16:09, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:44, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous long-term vandalism, disruptive editing and edit warring from IPs and anonymous users. Page has already been protected 15 times previously. 86.132.207.178 (talk) 17:48, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:43, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Done by Lectonar for six months. After six months the protection will automatically expire. Nyttend (talk) 15:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from both IPs and auto-confirmed accounts. CR4ZE (t • c) 09:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- And popular game. First-person shooter games are popular targets of vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 09:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:43, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Done by Lectonar for a period of six months. After six months the protection will automatically expire. Nyttend (talk) 15:28, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Template:POTD protected/2016-01-14 subpages
- Template:POTD protected/2016-01-14/1 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:POTD protected/2016-01-14/2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:POTD protected/2016-01-14/3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary full-protection: These pages will be appearing on the Main Page the day after tomorrow, but because they are added randomly, therefore the cascade protection doesn't work. See this ERRORS report about a previous case. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sudden spate of vandal edits in last 16 hours - 3 new accounts and 3 IPs. Arjayay (talk) 11:59, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 15:17, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of unsourced edits and vandalism from IP user. Page recenty had 24 hour protection, but the IP user has returned since its expiry, readding the exact same content. -- Whats new?(talk) 12:03, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 15:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This organisation has apparently changed its name; one editor and one IP seem unwilling to accept the change. Unacceptable edit-warring, removal of copyvio template, general disruption. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: article title should be Premier Badminton League; despite the current title, this is not a user page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Fixed. tutterMouse (talk) 11:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy burst of Google Doodle related IP vandalism. Safiel (talk) 05:17, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Tito Dutta (talk) 06:45, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and unsourced additions to BLP following media speculation regarding transfer. Egghead06 (talk) 11:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jenks24 (talk) 14:14, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip vandal has returned as an ongoing campaign of abusive edits to this BLP. ℕ ℱ 23:54, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined I blocked a bunch of IPs and an account or two; I hope that does the trick. Drmies (talk) 00:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IPs. -- numbermaniac (talk) 00:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Drmies (talk) 00:03, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Please unprotect article for non users to edit. 75.141.110.181 (talk) 20:07, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Courcelles:--Ymblanter (talk) 20:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Not unprotected Extremely high profile article, considered one of the site's vital articles, with a long history of vandalism prior to its indefinite semi-protection. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:35, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced changes. Jetstreamer Talk 16:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 03:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Check the edits by 178.*.*.*, it's always adding unsourced total of goals for Red Star Belgrade. SLBedit (talk) 19:16, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 03:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Clear vandalism where editors want to add their favourite players. . Qed237 (talk) 20:06, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1/12 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 03:03, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:58, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Deryck C. 22:01, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the last couple hours by multiple IPs and non-confirmed users. —Laoris (talk) 23:53, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. by another admin. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 03:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Jklamo (talk) 21:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 22:04, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi protection - Looking at the page history reveals a constant stream of IP vandalism. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) Jesus Christ loves you! 21:54, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for 1 month. The edit volume is low and recent edits have all been reverted, so I think PC is appropriate. Deryck C. 22:03, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, speculation, other errors.LM2000 (talk) 23:39, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 23:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Attracting vandalism due to recent news on Essendon Football Club supplements controversy. Jevansen (talk) 23:40, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 23:43, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
13 January 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going, persistent disruptive editing by IP's and other anonymous editors. Addition of original research that is not cited by any kind of verifiable source, or addition of information that contradicts cited sources. livelikemusic talk! 00:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined I'd try to talking to the users about your concerns. Additions look constructive and well-sourced, and were at the very least were added in good-faith — MusikAnimal talk 16:54, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:33, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – lots of edits from anon IP's regarding GE's move from CT to Boston - can we protect for 3 days until this simmers down?. Garchy (talk) 19:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Confirmed by non-admin that this is done and can be archived. Garchy (talk) 20:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article attacked with uncited spoiler vandalism almost immediately after the end of the last semi-protection; Challenge season articles have historically been plagued with uncited spoiler vandalism and additions of poorly-sourced content through their initial MTV run. One-month semi-protection recommended, which should cover the remainder of the season. DPH1110 (talk) 01:06, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent non-constructive edits by ips and non-confirmed editors . Onel5969 TT me 02:56, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection:Since this article pertains to an organization it is highly susceptible to vandalism and distortion of information by rivals, random users, hackers
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 19:04, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. No action taken at AIV, bringing it here. 2601:188:0:ABE6:1426:57EB:B017:9787 (talk) 13:49, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:14, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP user, 97.107.75.26. And vandalism started by Nj-2001. Lbmarshall (talk) 17:22, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IRC stalker derp I assume. Danger^Mouse (talk) 17:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us know if eventually you need a longer protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:32, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Article dispute JudeccaXIII (talk) 21:24, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edits directly against WP:FOOTY consensus to include notes that matches are not official. Qed237 (talk) 00:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:56, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The corresponding talk page has been indefinitely semi-protected for the past year, based on continual refusal by POV IP editors to source statements, refrain from deleting existing sourced text, etc. Unfortunately, the actual article page was not semi-protected, which has allowed a regular string of POV unsourced IP edits such as all these. Could an admin semi-protect California Valley Miwok Tribe to ensure that editors wishing to modify the article are at least contactable, so we can try to engage in a discussion? Many thanks. Rupert Clayton (talk) 02:33, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:58, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 04:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Extremely aggressive sockpuppetry using multiple IPs by blocked user. Jeppiz (talk) 09:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:49, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator MLauba. — MusikAnimal talk 17:00, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
RfC is currently open at Johann Sebastian Bach with 4-5 editors accepting changes with citations added to the proposed text, and two editors opposed User:Martindale and User:Francis Schonken. User:Francis has now started editing the page without waiting for the RfC to end along with User:Martindale as the two opposing editors who are in agreement with each other. Talk page of the Bach RfC and Talk page for Martindale have been notified to await the close of the RfC to no effect since User:Francis has decided to now close the RfC he has participated in by himself without waiting for a proper close, and then to continue to force his edits into the article. The RfC has also been listed for Admin close on the appropriate noticeboard, which currently has a little backlogged. Requesting short Full Protection for two weeks in order to allow for the Admin close of the RfC as it was listed there on the appropriate noticeboard last week. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 17:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- While writing this request I have noticed that the editor User talk:Francis Schonken has started to revert again on the Talk page to force his version of the edit and RfC into the Bach article against Wikipedia policy and guidelines for edit conduct. Could someone look at this to protect the page. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 17:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- User:Francis Schoncken is continuing edit warring on the Talk page of Johann Sebastian Bach in his overnight edits. Short term Full Page Protection is requested for two weeks and a warning to User:francis Schoncken to observe RfC rules for close by an uninvolved editor which has already been requested. His next revert in edit warring puts him at three reverts and he has had problems with other editors during the RfC (user:Martindale and user:Jashin). Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 15:51, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- It looks like a content dispute to me. I can of course fully protect the page (2 weeks is fully inappropriate, I doubt any admin would select more than 3 days), but if there is edit-warring at the talk page I doubt it could help.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- User:Francis Schoncken is continuing edit warring on the Talk page of Johann Sebastian Bach in his overnight edits. Short term Full Page Protection is requested for two weeks and a warning to User:francis Schoncken to observe RfC rules for close by an uninvolved editor which has already been requested. His next revert in edit warring puts him at three reverts and he has had problems with other editors during the RfC (user:Martindale and user:Jashin). Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 15:51, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, that seems appropriate to limit it to 3 days at Full protection, and hopefully that user will be encouraged to return to participate in the Talk discussion there. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 16:34, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, that seems appropriate to limit it to 3 days at Full protection, and hopefully that user will be encouraged to return to participate in the Talk discussion there. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 16:34, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 186.84.46.227 (talk) 19:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:27, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – With the huge jackpot and media coverage, this page has been getting some semi-regular vandalism and is under some high scrutiny. With the drawing coming on Wednesday, it will only get worse. --allthefoxes (Talk) 20:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandalism . CatcherStorm talk 06:27, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked., this was just one IP--Ymblanter (talk) 07:40, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Widr (talk) 12:23, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Want to salt my own userpage as per my own request. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 12:31, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi=protection: persistent vandalism from IPs. Furthermore, article has already had conflicting edits and will soon have more due to one member's Taiwanese-Chinese identity controversy. Katzenlibrary (talk) 17:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon edit warring over what anon feels is a violation of WP:NPOV when it appears more to be anon attempting to remove criticism about team from the page. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:54, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – one week for every IP the anon has used. That currently makes it six weeks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., do not see for the moment why a longer protection would be needed.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Today is Vivekananda's birth anniversary. Generally this time every year we face disruptive editing. Can an admin protect it for 3-4 days (max). Note the last edit I made to remove honrofic, was a revert as well. Thank you. . Tito Dutta (talk) 06:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., sorry for not reacting earlier--Ymblanter (talk) 07:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very short protection from IP and newly created account vandalising this and main article. Qed237 (talk) 00:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. - I'd rather wait to see if another sock shows up before protecting the talk page. AlexiusHoratius 01:50, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Edit warring about whether move to Los Angeles is official or not. Qpalzmmzlapq (talk | contribs) 01:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, For right now, I think we should wait on full protection. The Rams move looks like it will be announced officially in the next few minutes/hours, so it can wait. If the move turns out to be delayed and edit-warring continues, fell free to drop a note on my talk —GFOLEY FOUR!— 01:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew or indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Renew or indefinite pending changes. Vandalism will likely never stop. Popular worldwide retail chain everywhere and it is target to vandals. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 09:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:14, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Qwertyxp2000, it looks like you're just asking us to extend pending changes, but currently PC is configured so that it won't expire until the end of July. Are you asking for something else? Nyttend (talk) 23:23, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe I'll just ask later. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe I'll just ask later. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent BLP violations - adding death date with no references. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Update: References look to have been provided. Still may want to keep an eye out, but if vandalism isn't prevalent (it doesn't look to be at this time), then protection probably isn't needed. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined - like you said looks like it has calmed down - re-list if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 01:36, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 00:08, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Second this request, page has already been semi protected twice against the same sockpuppeteer and they are apparently back at it. I've already reported the user account currently being used at ARV but this puppeteer also uses multiple IP addresses and a single block will likely be insufficient. Cannolis (talk) 00:15, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent distributive editing. Previous semi-protection was for two weeks, expires today, January 12. I would like to request extension for a longer period. The film is still in its theatrical run and has yet to open in Japan (March 12). Despite this, article had been plagued by distributive editing from relentless multiple IPs making presumptuous, unsourced, POV edits regarding box office performance. Thank you. Wikicontributor12 (talk) 08:15, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- It's not yet expired, so let's wait and see what happens once it expires. This is a decline, but I'm not using the template because I want to fool the bot: if I decline it now, and then in a few days it's needed, the bot will still put up a big warning saying "this request was made in the last eight days but got denied", making it less likely that your request would be heeded. Nyttend (talk) 15:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- If you request an archive, it'll won't consider it as being denied. tutterMouse (talk) 20:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- TutterMouse, I don't know how to do that; would you do it for me? Nyttend (talk) 23:24, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Sure thing. tutterMouse (talk) 06:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- TutterMouse, I don't know how to do that; would you do it for me? Nyttend (talk) 23:24, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- If you request an archive, it'll won't consider it as being denied. tutterMouse (talk) 20:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being vandalized by IP hoppers . CatcherStorm talk 18:58, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined (appears to have stopped.) AlexiusHoratius 01:27, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent vandalism. Okchamali (talk) 17:03, 12 January 2016 (PT)
Majority of the people, more than several, agree that the mother's name is incorrect. We all get accused of being either fake or being sockpuppets. Requesting for full protection with the updated mother's name[1]. Okchamali (talk)
Declined (Requesting account has been blocked.) AlexiusHoratius 01:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruptive editing by IP's and anonymous editors]], by addition of information that violates the crystal-ball policy, against reliably sourced information. livelikemusic talk! 00:16, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:48, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Been having lots of IP edits lately, all reverted. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:23, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent non-constructive edits by ips and non-confirmed editors - Kroenke is owner of the St. Louis Rams. The team just announced a move to Los Angeles. Numerous apparently disgruntled persons who oppose the move seem to be vandalizing the page. It is getting difficult to keep up with. Related pages are also being vandalized; at least one report above. Donner60 (talk) 03:47, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also removed PC as it's pointless with semi protection, but once the semi protection expires you might want to ask for PC to be restored. Jenks24 (talk) 04:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and WP:BLP violations – Protection for one month on December 12 due to persistent vandalism expired today and the page has already been vandalized by two IPs and a non-confirmed user. Please re-protect. General Ization Talk 17:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent incorrect changes by ips. Onel5969 TT me 20:03, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — MusikAnimal talk 21:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs (probably the author) persistently remove speedy deletion tags. —teb728 t c 22:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:38, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 22:14, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent distributive editing. Donnowin1 (talk) 00:10, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mutt Lunker (talk) 00:13, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and page blanking by multiple IP addresses. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Update:Vandalism seems to have stopped. Protection may no longer be necessary. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:19, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:34, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The page keeps on getting changed due to the content dispute about 'tvOS' vs 'TVOS' vs 'TvOS' but editors keep on changing the capiterlization while a talk page discussion is being held. The changes are by autoconfirmed editors. Tom29739 (talk) 18:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped for the moment.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Manipulation of sourced contents by random IPs. Arjann (talk) 09:49, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:15, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Done by Cyphoidbomb, a semiprotection of 3 days. After 3 days the protection will automatically expire. Nyttend (talk) 23:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly created vandalism page, talk page needs salt too. Winner 42 Talk to me! 23:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
14 January 2016
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – And the disruptive editor/IP was back to mess up the article. The Banner talk 17:30, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:32, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP editors . TheWarOfArt (talk) 18:58, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:34, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism MYS77 ✉ 19:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:36, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent adding of unsourced, poorly formatted, overly detailed route information where only the bus lines are deemed notable and relevant. The Banner talk 16:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The disruptive edits are not so frequent, let us try pending changes instead.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CatcherStorm talk 16:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like low grade persistent vandalism. May need longer. --regentspark (comment) 17:32, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:49, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:23, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
To stop vandalism
- Chennai Super Kings (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Delhi Daredevils (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Kings XI Punjab (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Kolkata Knight Riders (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Mumbai Indians (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Rajasthan Royals (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Royal Challengers Bangalore (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Sunrisers Hyderabad (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Team Pune (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Team Rajkot (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Indian Premier League (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- 2016 Indian Premier League (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Some of the unknown users change the valuable source with un source now, later few days the season start with the auction, then no. of IP's will modify the valuable source. Please active Semi-Protection to the above pages. --Nivas88 19:58, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Checking to see if protection is necessary. GedUK 12:06, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. I can't see anything that merits protection on any of those articles. Relist if vandalism actually starts. GedUK 12:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Tremendously high volume editing going on right now, a good bit of it POV in nature. A cooling-off period might be in order. . Vanamonde93 (talk) 07:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK 12:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RGloucester — ☎ 17:43, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK 12:04, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism and NPOV violations by brand-new accounts and IP addresses likely to be members of the Oath Keepers organization. Organization is also in the news cycle due to the Bundy occupation in Oregon which is likely generating the repeated vandalism for purposes of Oath Keepers organizational self-promotion. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 04:01, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection:, repeated unsourced claims of Nefertiti being Armenian from Armenian IP-range. Khruner (talk) 15:02, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--regentspark (comment) 15:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated by a now-banned sock. Needs to be salted. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 08:02, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: This article has been permanently semi-protected for years. For some weird reason the semi-protect expired along with the temporary full protect. It has already attracted vandalising IPs. Jeppiz (talk) 10:59, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by multiple IPs. Jim1138 (talk) 11:01, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:30, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – He's kind of a meme right now. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 11:19, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:29, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 02:07, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 02:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Just for a bit. Winning lottery ticket reportedly sold here, so lots of vandalism. Thechased (talk) 04:33, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 04:40, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Apparently, this page still needs semi-protection since anons still think that the "Ashley Olsen" that died in Italy was this one. The one that died doesn't have an article. Steel1943 (talk) 06:13, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 08:37, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This individual recently gave the Republican rebuttal to American President Obama's State of the Union Address. Her page has been under persistent vandalism, generally consisting of partisan attacks, as a result. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:36, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 08:34, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent edit warring between confirmed users. Rutlandbaconsouthamptonshakespeare (talk) 08:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 08:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: IPs are adding numerous inappropriate and unsourced materials to the article almost immediately after its creation. AdrianGamer (talk) 03:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 01:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 01:19, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 01:19, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 01:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 01:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:23, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 01:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: String of edits from an IP (51.174.234.225) making an unsourced death claim about a BLP. Egsan Bacon (talk) 20:33, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 01:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy - addition of unsourced or poorly sourced contentious content by dynamic IP and SPA (sockpuppet). There was a 2 week semi-protection in place until January 1st but the problem has returned. Peter Rehse (talk) 21:49, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 01:14, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – high level of recent vandalism. C679 21:57, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 01:13, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 (talk) 22:36, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:51, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 01:12, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:40, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 01:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requested only as a last resort. Article is about the origin of a dish called Laksa, and some editors insist on listing Malaysia as the sole place of origin even though valid sources have been provided to show that other countries like Indonesia also originated this dish. These editors refuse to engage in discussion about conflicting content even though they have been repeatedly advised (5 times) to do so on the article talk page and on the revert comments [30][31][32][33][34]. Instead, they keep reverting and removing sources that weaken their preferred version. In addition, when the pro-"Malaysia is the only country that created Laksa" editors are reverting and removing the other sources, they are have been adding repeated instances of the same single source(Asiancorrespondence) that claims Malaysia as the sole source of origin as if to further reinforce their bias. Just need a semi/temporary page protection to encourage all relevant parties to discuss the issue on the talk page. Zhanzhao (talk) 04:34, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Update - As I had previously suggested in the talk page, I have created a new section in the article listing out all the different "origin" claims, all with references/sources given. However, even this get blanket removed, as non of the other editors are willing to discuss their edits. Other than page-protection, or if the decision is to not protect it, is there any other way I can force the editors to discuss the issue? Or any other board I can make a request? Zhanzhao (talk) 09:01, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Update - I had given my explanation in the talk page. Also my friend's from Malaysia explained in talk page. Based on reference that provided by 161.139.222.17, it was clear that Laksa originated in Malaysia. In talk page, he/she also had explained a number of references including a statement from their minister and Laksa also already recognized as their heritage food by the Malaysian Department of National Heritage under ‘Act 645 (National Heritage Act 2005)’. Also, one of references from Lara Dunston statement that published in Asian Correspondent. Lara Dunston very famous all over the world on assignment for publications from National Geographic Traveller in the USA to The Independent in the UK. In addition, Zhanzhao also show a bad attitude as the editor in Soto mie article. Please see the soto mie page:(cur | prev) 06:22, 12 January 2016 Zhanzhao (talk | contribs) m . . (4,725 bytes) (+229) . . (Reverted 1 edit by 161.139.222.17 (talk) to last revision by Lee788. (TW)) (undo | thank) and (cur | prev) 07:53, 12 January 2016. He/she edited without valid source with claimed that Indonesian dish, Soto mie also from Singapore. That's why, i can not trust Zhanzhao, and i prefer Malaysian editors. Here, i request to protect Laksa article from Zhanzhao that make Vandalism on Wikipedia page.Magbantay (talk) 4:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for finally using the talk page after repeated requests. I need to point out that I corrected myself by personally provided the link to Gunkarta in the Soto discussion which shows the dish to be of Indonesia origin,[35], which he used and acknowledged by Gunkarta [36]. Which you will have realized if you used the talk page more often.
- Update - I had given my explanation in the talk page. Also my friend's from Malaysia explained in talk page. Based on reference that provided by 161.139.222.17, it was clear that Laksa originated in Malaysia. In talk page, he/she also had explained a number of references including a statement from their minister and Laksa also already recognized as their heritage food by the Malaysian Department of National Heritage under ‘Act 645 (National Heritage Act 2005)’. Also, one of references from Lara Dunston statement that published in Asian Correspondent. Lara Dunston very famous all over the world on assignment for publications from National Geographic Traveller in the USA to The Independent in the UK. In addition, Zhanzhao also show a bad attitude as the editor in Soto mie article. Please see the soto mie page:(cur | prev) 06:22, 12 January 2016 Zhanzhao (talk | contribs) m . . (4,725 bytes) (+229) . . (Reverted 1 edit by 161.139.222.17 (talk) to last revision by Lee788. (TW)) (undo | thank) and (cur | prev) 07:53, 12 January 2016. He/she edited without valid source with claimed that Indonesian dish, Soto mie also from Singapore. That's why, i can not trust Zhanzhao, and i prefer Malaysian editors. Here, i request to protect Laksa article from Zhanzhao that make Vandalism on Wikipedia page.Magbantay (talk) 4:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 21:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Anonymous user/s are repeatedly vandalizing the article using different IPs. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 21:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Permanent protection: High level of IP vandalism, always restarts as soon as semi-protection is liftedPrisencolin (talk) 23:08, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 01:07, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Eteethan(talk) 00:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 01:05, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
15 January 2016
Full or long-term semi-protection:Disruptive IP returned immediately after last protection expired.--TMCk (talk) 13:26, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:16, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Bentogoa (talk) 16:08, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and inappropriate removal of content. Dat GuyTalkContribs 18:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:12, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs vandalizing the article. --. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:57, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- User:Rsrikanth05
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:02, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: increased IP vandalism due to debate. CFredkin (talk) 01:21, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:02, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: recent spike in repeated IP hopping vandalism from multiple IPs making identical incorrect changes. oknazevad (talk) 01:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Extensive history of disruption and lengthy protection log — MusikAnimal talk 18:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Ongoing insertion of deliberate factual errors. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:06, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and edit warring due to his new opponent in the election, Jimmy Giles. He even referenced it on his Facebook page! Light-jet pilot (talk) 05:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:07, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People associated with the crew are adding promotional content. Se-protection advised. Nairspecht (talk) 08:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Requesting for long term protection. Apparently unsourced editing starts just after expiring the protections.--Charles Turing (talk) 14:29, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:10, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Peristent IP vandalism over the past few weeks. Constantine ✍ 09:08, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:11, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Peristent IP vandalism over the past weeks. Constantine ✍ 09:08, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:12, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unsourced IP edits due to transfer rumours. JMHamo (talk) 01:10, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:00, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 01:56, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 Weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:19, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Long term ethnic "warring" with no explanations or discussion. Doug Weller talk 10:51, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 10:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from different IPs and new users alike. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:28, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SQLQuery me! 01:07, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Manual of Style/External support (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Near constant edit-warring has enveloped this page. It should be stopped. RGloucester — ☎ 18:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. — MusikAnimal talk 18:24, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Zcbeaton (talk) 08:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 08:45, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Keeps getting recreated. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 21:34, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Not done Article has only been created twice and user has been warned about recreating the page, don't see a need to protect just yet. Sam Walton (talk) 23:38, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tournament over so no need for mass changes. A dynamic IP vandalising is only edits. Qed237 (talk) 21:59, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sam Walton (talk) 23:40, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One of the targets of dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 22:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sam Walton (talk) 23:41, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continual unsourced changes by IP since the page was controversially moved on January 13 (potentially in good faith because of the new contested page title, but still without any references). Dark Cocoa Frosting (talk) 23:11, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 01:04, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently died, a lot of bad edits. JMHamo (talk) 23:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 01:04, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Huge amount of IP vandalism. On January 12th alone, there were about 5 cases I could find. Requesting immediate semi protection to curb vandalism from non-registered users.
Some examples over one day:
- For about an hour, this was the lead text: "Operation Barbarossa Is my best kush name i could give myself (German: Unternehmen Barbarossa) ... Over the course I like eating panda eyes of the operation, about four million soldiers ..."
- Before that, it was "Operation Barbarossa' Is my best kush name i could give myself (German: Unternehmen Barbarossa)MY NAME DOLAND TRUMP AND I A PROVE THIS MESSAGE"
- A day before this, someone changed the lead to "Operation Barbarossa HEY man want to go smoke the good kush"
Please be aware that the undos made are usually not marked as vandalism undos, as a lot of fixes are done by members who don't know better.
KevinNinja (talk) 00:26, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 01:03, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism MYS77 ✉ 19:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:35, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:53, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sam Walton (talk) 23:39, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism - mostly inane comments by various IP editors. Scjessey (talk) 23:07, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sam Walton (talk) 23:42, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: Long term ip vandalism that seems to start again after temp semi-protection stops. If permanent is denied, please make it a long temporary semi-protection. AlbinoFerret 12:28, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined Constructive edits being accepted via pending changes, so I think PC will suffice for now — MusikAnimal talk 18:15, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Please fully protect this article until the RM is complete or there is further information to confirm these changes that are being made. . JOJ Hutton 14:41, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined Don't really see any disruption warranting full protection at this time. Semi was just re-added by Gilliam — MusikAnimal talk 18:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tigerpound, they've already admitted to using socks to remove speedy tags. The admin could just delete and salt as an alternative. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:01, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:14, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 21:50, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:53, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
16 January 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Continued reverting of edits by a registered user despite the US government not considering Afghans as Asian Americans. Instead they said I was pushing my POV. (137.147.156.148 (talk) 09:52, 16 January 2016 (UTC))
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Katietalk 15:32, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continued reverting of edits by a registered user despite the US government considering Afghans as Middle Eastern Americans. (137.147.156.148 (talk) 09:52, 16 January 2016 (UTC))
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Katietalk 15:32, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Edit war--82.55.247.60 (talk) 12:52, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. He's already been to ANI once, and though he hasn't edited today, he was warned a few days ago and still persisted. Katietalk 15:23, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – please change to semi-protection; clearly the pending changes protection isn't making a difference. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 13:04, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined It's working just fine. Remember that you can see the vandalism because you're logged in. The vast majority of page views are unregistered people and they only see the last accepted version. Katietalk 15:13, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jetstreamer Talk 14:17, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. This vandalism isn't about the page anyway - it's a troll. Katietalk 15:27, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by ip . Onel5969 TT me 15:20, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Katietalk 15:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Yeepsi (talk) 16:14, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:53, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Repeated removal of infobox without explanation by multiple IPs. Jim1138 (talk) 16:56, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:51, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing has been an occasional but structural thing on this page, and therefore I decided to bring this up here, as this time an IP hopper is continously doing this through various IP's. I won't need to go into detail regarding the IP hoppers' edits, which include "sourcing" that don't even back up the added statements. - LouisAragon (talk) 17:41, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:57, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – If I am correct, this article was protected for the same reasons as the previous protection. Users/contributors are still insisting to add Selena Gomez into the cast list when her role has not been confirmed as a cameo or an actual role, per the hidden note. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 18:15, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Adding promotional content without proper references. Nairspecht (talk) 18:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:03, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. clpo13(talk) 18:31, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:04, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Dat GuyTalkContribs 11:17, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 11:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:37, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 17:03, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:45, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: A lot of anger at the highly controversial Mike Jones, leading to extensive insults by IPs. All of which I personally find correct, but all violating WP:BLP. Jeppiz (talk) 17:06, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:46, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 17:07, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:48, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated vandalism/BLP violations by IPs. Thomas.W talk 17:23, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Changing of a guest star from a future episodes continues as of when the previous protection expired, which goes against the source. Amaury (talk) 05:04, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SQLQuery me! 07:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I was going to protect this but I can see a need to edit it, so can someone else please protect? I've found a major change in an old edit moving material around so the source no longer backs it. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 07:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SQLQuery me! 07:42, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism/disruptive edits. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 09:06, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:12, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism has continued since the last protection was removed. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 13:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 13:07, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We've had a number of IPs recently show up and try to change his (sourced) birthplace. Perhaps semi protection will slow this down. Dbrodbeck (talk) 13:09, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:13, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent unsourced changes. Jetstreamer Talk 01:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SQLQuery me! 07:27, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent distributive editing by relatively new user WakeFan91. Previous semi-protection was for two weeks. Request extension for a longer period. WakeFan91 has been incessantly making edits with point of view jargon regarding the film's box office performance. It is worth noting that the film is still in its theatrical run, and has yet to open in Japan (March 12). Thank you. Wikicontributor12 (talk) 02:19, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Not done - the user you reference is autoconfirmed, SPP would not have any effect. SQLQuery me! 07:30, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive editing - 112.198.77.6 (talk) 03:18, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SQLQuery me! 07:32, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anons repeatedly removing valid sourced information from a BLP. Sitush (talk) 09:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- Bishonen has stepped in. 1 month semi-protection applied. - Sitush (talk) 10:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Done (for the bot) BethNaught (talk) 10:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – or renew pending changes. The article is recently frequently edited, but it may have been also vandalized or disrupted. George Ho (talk) 05:03, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 07:39, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Over the last four months, on at least eight occasions, different IPs have replaced the content of the page with that of a different Aaron Carpenter (a YouTuber). Diffs: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —Laoris (talk) 05:53, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 07:41, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism and biased statements in relation to Brownlow issue. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 07:13, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 07:41, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism due to being in news cycle, similar to IP vandalism of Oath Keepers. May be same vandals moving over following semiprotection of Oath Keepers. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 02:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This is a heavily edited article, but almost all of the editing is by auto-confirmed users, so semi-protection would not do much. In any case, the recent edits I see from IPs mostly appear to be constructive, not vandalism. If the situation changes, ask again. MelanieN (talk) 00:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism on subject involved in current football transfer rumours. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 11:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 07:23, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- List of awards and nominations received by Leonardo DiCaprio (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frankie talk 12:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 07:24, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Simply look at the billion reverts in the edit history. I didn't go to DR/N yet however both of them have been interacting in a bad way and edit-warring in most of their articles. Both should probably be temporarily blocked for 10RR or something like that. Dat GuyTalkContribs 19:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thought on this one a moment, fully protected for one day for everyone to cool off. I hate fully-protecting articles.
Fully protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 07:26, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism - 112.198.102.237 (talk) 03:13, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 07:31, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Remove move protection: The team is now officially known as the Los Angeles Rams. The admin who protected the page from moves, Bagumba, requested that I comment on the move discussion, but that is no longer necessary. TheTMOBGaming2 (talk) 01:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Note: Unfortunately, your request at my talk page made no mention about the move protection, it seemed to be asking me to move the page myself. At any rate, I'm not sure why believe it "is no longer necessary" for you to simply comment at the related RM at Talk:St._Louis_Rams#Requested_move_13_January_2016 to reach a consensus. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 02:14, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- Memtioning my support is only going to prolong it. TheTMOBGaming2 (talk) 02:18, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Done SQLQuery me! 06:51, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, the protection was removed as part of the RM being processed.—Bagumba (talk) 06:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Peristent IP vandalism over the past few weeks. Constantine ✍ 09:08, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:27, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, persistent vandalism by registered and unregistered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 3:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:23, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism issues by registered and unregistered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 3:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. (Note: this is an article, not a template) MelanieN (talk) 00:26, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Last dozen plus IP edits have all been vandalism. Elvey(t•c) 22:55, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It is among the most vandalized pages, is among the most edited by User:ClueBot NG, is extremely popular, and has a long history of being semi-protected. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 01:04, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:46, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Because of Tumblr. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 01:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:43, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Peristent IP vandalism over the past few weeks. Constantine ✍ 09:08, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:47, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Satisfaction (Benny Benassi song)
Temporary semi-protection: IP user with dynamic address engaging in revert warring. OpenFuture (talk) 09:56, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:57, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The vandalism has even lead to an AfD start. Dat GuyTalkContribs 18:42, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined Not going to protect an active AFD candidate unless it's really egregious. Katietalk 21:03, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User trying to create article about non-notable company, destroying redirect to a notable company. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — MusikAnimal talk 17:59, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:41, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 18:03, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – At least one IP editor keeps changing the character of Barsad to The Maskatta (sp?) Man even though the character portrayed in The Dark Knight Rises is Barsad. CrashUnderride 05:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — MusikAnimal talk 18:09, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
17 January 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 04:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, Not enough recent vandalism, in my opinion. Also, going back into the history, there have been a fair amount of good faith/construction edits by IP users. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 17:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Melonkelon (talk) 10:54, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- IP blocked by User:Zzuuzz. [User:Melonkelon|Melonkelon]], don't revert so many times. Report to WP:ANI or somewhere if you need help. --Tito Dutta (talk) 16:33, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by Felixtclo (contribs). See also recent vandalism incidents in Multiplication's history by a number of 14.0.x.x IPs, and a repeated spamming of speedily deleted new articles which are bad duplicates. Murph9000 (talk) 16:43, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 17:23, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated numbers vandalism by IPs (i.e. deliberate introduction of factual errors), inflating the number of active personnel by 5x-10x (the source in the article says 8,500, while the IPs add varying numbers, upp to a totally ludicrous 85,000). And it's not good-faith edits since they have been told what the source says. (If I seem irritated it's because I'm tired of reverting them...) Thomas.W talk 23:19, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP vandalism. Eteethan(talk) 15:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:53, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:45, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:55, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The IPs are back at it this month, particularly starting on the 13th. Zappa24Mati 02:50, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP repeatedly tries to replace the company's logo in the infobox by a picture of a wrecked car. Bouchecl (talk) 07:25, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:12, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Conifer (talk) 08:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Dat GuyTalkContribs 09:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Last edit was in 2013, not that persistent. tutterMouse (talk) 11:10, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- @TutterMouse: Oops....
Request withdrawn Dat GuyTalkContribs 11:17, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:48, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- @TutterMouse: Oops....
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think this article needs protection until Feb 7th (Superbowl). A week after Houston's season ended, the vandalism is still going. Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 12:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:18, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Article about living person subject to vandilism. User720830 (talk) 12:19, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism/troll edits rising from a recent reddit post. Users inserting references to memes, gabe newell, steam, 4chan. Lukeroge (talk) 13:21, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistant addition of unsourced material by at least two related IPs, who ignore ew warnings. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:53, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Philg88.. Favonian (talk) 17:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated spam. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:44, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Done (for the bot) BethNaught (talk) 17:13, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden burst of vandalism. Qpalzmmzlapq (talk | contribs) 23:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. 1 account, 1 IP were blocked. --Tito Dutta (talk) 16:29, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CatcherStorm talk 08:37, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 09:44, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection Edit warring by registered editors. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 12:42, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:28, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over screenshot - maybe warning the two involved users may be sufficient. Denniss (talk) 17:27, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. — MusikAnimal talk 18:55, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. clpo13(talk) 22:23, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined It looks to me as if the edit war has been resolved at the talk page. In any case it was not prolonged or severe enough to require full protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. clpo13(talk) 22:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:19, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 23:01, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Future Perfect at Sunrise.. MelanieN (talk) 01:23, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from dynamip IP. Qed237 (talk) 20:53, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:21, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from dynamip IP and newly created accounts. Qed237 (talk) 20:54, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:42, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism Taffe316 (talk) 21:30, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:45, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism Taffe316 (talk) 22:13, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Just got elected the first female President of Taiwan and is now being targeted with petty vandalism. Curro2 (talk) 16:57, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 1, 2, Same IP, These two edits removed the trolling edits, 3, 4 Marvel Hero (talk) 18:12, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't seem that out of hand — MusikAnimal talk 19:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. ShugSty (talk) 20:12, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:52, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
18 January 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. MusaTalk ☻ 07:42, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. I blocked 80.11.104.207. Feel free to ask on my page if the problem persists. Bishonen | talk 11:47, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – In relation to what appears to be a content dispute involving Patternpat1 - user has been warned over the map image he uses for the article, which is inconsistent with other articles on Philippine settlements, yet he hasn't discussed this matter with others as to why his version should be used. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:44, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:44, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- List of top international association football goal scorers by country (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Full on edit warring between two editors that probably should be blocked. . Qed237 (talk) 13:08, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: - repeated vandalism by IP users. - theWOLFchild 06:42, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:42, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Highly visible template -- 2,122 transclusions. jcgoble3 (talk) 07:43, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing/vandalism. Give Your a Break 12:26, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:36, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:47, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:51, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:28, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of continuing IP vandalism. I think protection should be applied for a longer period of time. This behavior will not cease until the refugee crisis in Europe is over, and who knows when that might be... Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:22, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:33, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism because the Scottish media is speculating that he may be transferred to Rangers FC. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 13:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:31, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: An IP editor (all in close range with each other, so likely the same editor with a dynamic IP) continuously re-adding a poorly sourced, unconfirmed rumor despite it being removed by multiple editors, and refusing to discuss. oknazevad (talk) 04:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing/Vandalism. MusaTalk ☻ 07:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 11:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by several IPs. Jim1138 (talk) 08:37, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 11:43, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Often vandalism – likely will be more frequent due to upcoming mini-series. --Obsuser (talk) 00:22, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I don't think PC is going to help considering this is a highly popular page about a slang term (just like LOL). <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 01:04, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined Already pending changes protected, and it seems to be working fine. You're seeing the disruptive edits (three in the last thirteen days) because you're logged in. The vast majority of Wikipedia viewers are not logged in, and they only see the latest accepted version. Katietalk 02:21, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created and deleted many times. JMHamo (talk) 01:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Katietalk 03:51, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Barely used template full protected in 2006 ... protecting admin inactive since 2009. NE Ent 16:46, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Note: This is a substitution template used to install scripts in user js files. If it were unprotected and it were fiddled with, users could be tricked into installing hijack code. Recommend this request be declined. BethNaught (talk) 16:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Perhaps it could be knocked down to 'Template editor' protected?... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:24, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- I agree that this is a rare example which is best kept admin protected. For an individual user, the potential harm from a malicious change is significant. An unnoticed malicious change could enable theft of login credentials, or cause an innocent user to perform automated random vandalism, as just a couple of examples of the potential for harm. The immediate impact would not be as severe as a malicious change to MediaWiki:Common.js, but the impact for an individual user unlucky enough to catch a bad revision of it has the potential to be just as bad. Going by the talk page, there's not a high demand for changes to it, so I fail to see a justification for increased risk. --Murph9000 (talk) 17:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Fair enough, request withdrawn. NE Ent 02:05, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor (for the bot) Katietalk 03:50, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- List of Billboard Mainstream Top 40 number-one songs of 2005 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Various users (some confirmed to be sockpuppets of User:Stumpwentz, see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Stumpwentz/Archive) have been changing info in this article, falsifying what song was #1 from various weeks, in particular saying one song or another by the group Green Day was on top. These changes go against what Billboard says was #1 on their Mainstream Top 40 chart for those weeks. MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:21, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 23:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent page blanking by sockpuppeteer. –Fredddie™ 22:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 23:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:24, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Multiple good faith but incorrect edits changing his position to head coach in infobox before it's taken effect. NE Ent 02:07, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Bagumba. Katietalk 02:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See edit history. Multiple IPs trying to add bold names in a table counter to MOS. . EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 04:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption from a blocked sockmaster suspected of editing through proxy servers. Qed237 (talk) 15:30, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP-hopping editor keeps adding unreferenced and inaccurate material. Mezigue (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:37, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John from Idegon (talk) 00:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:40, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: long-term issues with vandalism (including additions of deliberate factual errors), having previously been protected for 6 months. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. (before the blocked guy showed up vandalism was pretty slow.) AlexiusHoratius 17:51, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, blp violations. 2601:188:0:ABE6:9889:7AE0:D477:36FB (talk) 22:12, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:25, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Protection is needed. Eteethan(talk) 22:38, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Look at the page's messy edit history. Most of the revisions by vandals have to be revision deleted as BLP violations. Eyesnore 22:45, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Pinging admins on right now because protection is REALLY needed: Materialscientist and BethNaught. Eteethan(talk) 22:48, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:10, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. by another admin. only (talk) 23:19, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism Taffe316 (talk) 22:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 23:18, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP Issues. Eteethan(talk) 22:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 23:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 23:19, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 23:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
19 January 2016
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 04:17, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined High edit rate but doesn't look like there's that much disruption from unconfirmed users — MusikAnimal talk 17:11, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Baidu bar user IMANGOw had repeatedly added unsourced content. Dabao qian (talk) 15:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now. No user with that name has edited the page. No attempt to communicate with the IP editors seems to have been made. Rmhermen (talk) 17:44, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Grey padlock is missing. Pickuptha'Musket (talk) 21:41, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Done, Pickuptha'Musket, anyone can add {{pp-vandalism}} as appropriate, a request is not necessary. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:54, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. ilovechristianmusic (Tell Me Something!) 14:59, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 16:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This is a case of some serious amount of sockpuppetry. Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined It looks like it's going to be closed soon, and admins know to measure consensus and count !votes — MusikAnimal talk 16:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 21:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined Three times is my policy (other admins feel free to override) — MusikAnimal talk 16:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. GodDav1 (talk) 11:36, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Not done Page deleted — MusikAnimal talk 17:09, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Full protection - RfC is currently open at Johann Sebastian Bach with 4-5 editors in support of changes with citations added to the proposed text, and two editors Opposed User:Martindale and User:Francis Schonken. User:Martindale and User:Francis have returned to edit warring on the page and trying to force their version of the edit into the article despite warning from User:Softlavender to follow RfC policy and guideline. In addition, previous Full page protection from User:Ymblanter for User:Martindale and User:Francis to stop edit warring and to encourage them to either participate in the open RfC or to await its outcome has been ignored. The two editors have refused to do this and have continued to set aside the warning made to them and to force their version of the edit into the article against Wikipedia policy and guidelines. Request here is made for Full Page Protection for the article for 5-days and final warnings to both User:Martindale and User:Francis to follow RfC guidelines and policies and to not force their edits into the article when an RfC is still open and since a preliminary warning was already made by User:Softlaverder to User:Martindale concerning this matter.
The RfC has also been listed for Admin close on the appropriate noticeboard, which currently has a little backlog. Requesting short Full Page Protection for 5-days in order to allow for the Admin close of the RfC as it was listed and since the previous 3-day Full Page Protection was ignored by the two opposing editors. The page should be restored to the version previously protected by User:Ymblanter. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 15:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 20:36, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated additions of poor content by anons. The sources are unreliable, much is unsourced, and there is a long list of alleged caste members that fails tests such as NLIST, V and/or BLP. Sitush (talk) 17:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 20:37, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:29, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Given the history of constant vandalism and a fairly insubstantial "good" version, I wouldn't be opposed to a redirect to Eugenia Collier, protected or otherwise. tutterMouse (talk) 18:42, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 20:38, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:34, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 20:39, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by anons or new users (see history). Jut to say, one month ago an user changed the population of ND with the one of whole Delhi metropolis, despite the hidden notice in the section "demographics", and this ref (censusindia.gov.in) in the infobox, that contradicts the edit. I think it's very serious that a vandalism/mistake as this one should stay for a month on the Encyclopedia: confusing Delhi with New Delhi, saying that 11 mln people live in an area of 42.7 km². IMHO an indef semi-protection should (IMHO) avoid this kind of problems. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 04:08, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:20, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:01, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:17, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful IP edits. JMHamo (talk) 16:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:16, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Growing level of IP vandalism. Connected to Oath Keepers, Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 16:58, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:12, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Move-protection: ongoing dispute regarding how the page should be called. One user argues it should be moved to Ricardo Rosselló even though the press calls him 'Ricky'. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 07:13, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Creation protection page has already been deleted twice today. The whole thing also exists here User talk:Mokalpur but I know that user talk space is allowed some leeway so I don't know if I should add a speedy tag there as well. MarnetteD|Talk 16:30, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Keri (talk) 17:08, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Seconding request. Currently under organized vandalism attack. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:24, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:38, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism/unconstructive edits beginning shortly after most recent protection expired. Everymorning (talk) 01:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It seems to be the accidental subject of new users trying to create articles. Non-autoconfirmed users should have little reason to edit this page, anyway. →Σσς. (Sigma) 02:11, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. — MusikAnimal talk 17:08, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism Taffe316 (talk) 03:00, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:09, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. MusaTalk ☻ 12:23, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:49, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Extend PC or temporary semi-protection: Edits by one autoconfirmed editor were reverted; so were ones by IP. I asked protecting administrator to extend, but she hasn't responded yet. Also, the protection will expire soon. --George Ho (talk) 18:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent IP hopper who changes dates throughout article. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:02, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:54, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent IP hopper who changes dates throughout article. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:02, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:54, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Very often vandalism (see history please, and everything will be clearer). --Obsuser (talk) 06:36, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:12, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - a bit slow but re-list if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 11:41, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – have requested that this page be protected as it appears to have be vandalised numerous time and real name needs to be established. . Hot Pork Pie 13:41, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:13, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced content to BLP, not everyone likes this referee. Qed237 (talk) 13:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- List of the world's busiest airports by cargo traffic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request indefinite, or otherwise longterm, semi-protection to counter ip edit warring on country name (flagicon) against RfC consensus. Edit warring restarts as soon as protection is lifted. Wolbo (talk) 14:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:16, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after protection from dynamip IP. Qed237 (talk) 14:21, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:18, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BRPever (talk) 16:13, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 01:19, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of similar vandalism by new accounts over the last few days - apparently trollfest for a whole drawerful of socks. bonadea contributions talk 16:24, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:20, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated insertion of commercial links by IPs. Jeppiz (talk) 16:50, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – returns of issues which lead to previous protection . Mdann52 (talk) 16:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:16, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: IP edits have been reverted. I asked protecting administrator to extend, but she hasn't responded yet. Also, the protection will expire soon. --George Ho (talk) 18:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - let's wait and see if protection is needed after the expiration of what's currently there. AlexiusHoratius 02:17, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP users repeatedly add unsourced information to the page. MurielMary (talk) 20:39, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 22:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection Recent death, vandalism. Thechased (talk) 22:42, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 00:29, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Copyright violations by several users/IPs. Mike1901 (talk) 22:58, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:45, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over the past three months by multiple IPs (at least 20 cases of blanking or significant deletion in this period of time, and more before that). Template has 273 transclusions. Gap9551 (talk) 23:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Long-term issues with vandalism, having previously been protected for up to 6 months. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:12, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:16, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 00:34, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over last hour. Subject has just moved to a major football club, so this unwanted attention will perhaps last for a couple more days. SOAD KoRn (talk) 00:32, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:55, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: User request. I ask that this page be fully protected so that I can test aspects of Wikipedia using it. Steel1943 (talk) 06:45, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: User request. I ask that this page be creation protected (from all users) so that I can use it to test various aspects of Wikipedia. Steel1943 (talk) 06:47, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated blanking by IP . Nomoskedasticity (talk) 08:28, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:36, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A number of IP anon users are keep on adding hoax information on the "Imports" section of this article. Anons usually add their names or names of foreign players that are still unverified. WayKurat (talk) 08:30, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:33, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – This article needs this protection. It is disruptively edited and a user (User:Karimismybae) has created account just to edit this page and says herself authorised by the real person to edit it. . MusaTalk ☻ 09:20, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:32, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Article is created by one side in the "controversy", persistently denies any attempts to add explanations of the other side of the controversy to the page.
- Comment from uninvolved on-looker: there is on-going edit warring between registered editors (not vandalism). Without comment on the merits of the article, temporary full protection and/or handing out blocks to both parties for 3RR (I think it's up to 7RR now) seems like a good idea until they start using the talk page to work out their disputes.--William Thweatt TalkContribs 09:33, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Several IPs violating WP:NOETHNICGALLERIES. Jeppiz (talk) 10:47, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Came here to request the same thing - The named accounts have been blocked, leading to the use of multiple IPs from St.Petersburg - Arjayay (talk) 11:07, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:30, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- List of Stanley Cup Western Conference Finals broadcasters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 12:33, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:44, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- List of Stanley Cup Eastern Conference Finals broadcasters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 12:37, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:44, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: persistent disruptive editing, including sockpuppeting to avoid bans, by an individual since October. ALPolitico (talk) 14:16, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:46, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, also at the moment Cluebot is confused as to the right status of the page because the vandals are vandalizing the vandals and unvandalizing the vandals as well.Falconjh (talk) 14:35, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:46, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP edit warring. Mikepellerintalk 14:38, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:47, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – transfer rumours. Qed237 (talk) 15:15, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:49, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple socks of blocked editor edit warring over WP:BLPVIO content. First two IP's blocked, additional in current use - appear to be open proxies, so blocking has proven unfruitful. Scr★pIronIV 15:38, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:49, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:45, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:23, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism from sock. Qed237 (talk) 11:59, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:24, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Incoherent capslock legal threats resuming within 12 hours of the previous weeklong protection expiring. McGeddon (talk) 12:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:27, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Months of unsourced BLP violations concerning the subject's sexual orientation and/or partners from multiple IPs and throwaway accounts. Meters (talk) 21:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:10, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Persistent disruptive editing, persistent vandalism by unregistered and registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 4:18, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing/vandalism. Give Your a Break 12:26, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - level of disruption a bit low - just revert it. AlexiusHoratius 13:50, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit-warring and sockpuppetry by unregistered editor User:77.57.145.121. (And can an admin please (a) extend the block on the sockmaster User:77.57.145.121 and (b) block the sockpuppet User:46.253.189.242? Thanks!) ElKevbo (talk) 17:07, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 17:45, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism since it is today's Google Doodle. Opencooper (talk) 21:43, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 21:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. One month was probably excessive, I didn't realise about the Google thing. Bishonen | talk 22:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
20 January 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 18:24, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:56, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, has previously been semi'd for similar reasons. Article is currently up for discussion at AfD--suggest semiprotection until the AfD closes for the sake of a proper evaluation. --Finngall talk 18:55, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:00, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:53, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:39, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IP fan cruft. Nightclubbing 05:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:15, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – As with many list of castes, this one sees repeated BLP violations from anons. There are a lot of reverts by ClueBot and experienced editors in this month alone. I fear there are also many experienced editors who also do not "get" the BLP problem, explained at User:Sitush/Common#Castelists, because they are not familiar with caste-related content - this means pending changes probably will not work. Sitush (talk) 13:53, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 15:17, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after recent protection. Transfer rumours. Qed237 (talk) 14:00, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:29, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Gilliam. — MusikAnimal talk 18:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spats of vandalism - one-week protection recommended; additional protection may be needed if the Broncos reach the Super Bowl. DPH1110 (talk) 17:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandalism. NYBrook098 (talk) 18:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:19, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High media coverage. Lots of unsourced claims and a sprinkling of vandalism and disruptive editing. --allthefoxes (Talk) 02:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Considering the high-profile nature of article subject, I'm surprised it's this calm. Most offerings seem to be in good faith. Resubmit if it gets worse. m.o.p 05:16, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent inaccurate edits, and BLP violations - has been inaccurately reported as dead in a (normally) reliable source. Is, in fact, in a coma and being assessed for brain death, but not actually dead (yet). Semi-protection for a couple of days until the facts settle would be useful Richard Gadsden (talk) 09:44, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 11:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persisent vandalism--Prisencolin (talk) 09:55, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 11:07, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Premature editing facing transfer. Please protect for 1 week. Shreerajtheauthor (talk) 01:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two editors have persisted the false claim; if the problem gets worse, please resubmit. m.o.p 05:03, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism including changes to band members' names. This did not let up after it was previously protected and it was just vandalized saying the members committed murder; unacceptable for a BLP. Opencooper (talk) 01:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. m.o.p 05:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – The vast majority of the edits on this page have been vandalism by new users and IPs, stretching back for some time. DiscantX 02:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. m.o.p 05:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: relentless vandalism regarding year of birth and age at death (see [37]). Quis separabit? 02:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. m.o.p 05:10, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism from a variety of IPs, but with a similar theme, spread over the past 2 weeks. David Biddulph (talk) 03:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:00, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editing fans keep changing the supporting cast members into starring ones (against the poster and trailer credits), leaving the article unstable. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:58, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. MB298 (talk) 23:06, 19 January 2016 (UTC). MB298 (talk) 23:06, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like three incidents in the last day or two, all resolved fairly quickly. Seems to have stopped. Ricky81682 (talk) 03:59, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Consistent photo vandalism, protection desired by Vanessa's talent management. 2602:306:8B23:6C0:3615:9EFF:FE3B:515C (talk) 00:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, Semi protection would have no effect since the users are autoconfirmed. I've warned the user causing the issues (presumably this IP user). only (talk) 03:47, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent anonymous IP vandalism. NYBrook098 (talk) 06:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unreleased film that has been subject to unconstructive edits, unsourced speculation, and casting hoaxes from IP editors. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:43, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- I think maybe this needs more explanation. Here are some diffs: misrepresenting a source (I removed some names that are not in the cited source), vandalism to remove confirmed cast members, speculation (roles have not been announced for some of these actors yet), addition of unannounced roles to the plot, etc. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:47, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. m.o.p 04:54, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued, on-going disruptive vandalism by IP's and anonymous editors by adding non-cited, original research and unverifiable information. livelikemusic talk! 01:39, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. m.o.p 05:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pages moves caused protection to disappear. The Banner talk 01:52, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected Original protection restored. Indefinite protection doesn't seem warranted. m.o.p 05:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ⁓ Hello71 22:36, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 03:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Full-protection: (indefinite). High level of potential for vandalism, and inability of Tip-of-the-day project members to monitor the quantity of pages. These are redirect pages that now need to be locked down to further editing to prevent disruption, confusion, and need for monitoring them. Please lock down all 366 pages listed below:
Lots of pages
|
---|
Wikipedia talk:Tip of the day/April 1 |
Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk}
00:36, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 03:53, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 04:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Disambigs aren't made for frequent edits. Plus this page gets IP vandalism. Pickuptha'Musket (talk) 21:41, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:54, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Various reasons including, but not limited to, consistent unsourced info + potential vandalism due to high status (arguably the biggest podcaster around and speaks on numerous controversial topics) MisterJay123 (talk) 21:48, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. and pending changes are enabled. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:20, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive groups of socks with evident COI removing negative material. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:15, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Looking over the article history, I think this would be extremely helpful. --Ronz (talk) 00:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If it persists afterwards, I can extend it. Enigmamsg 01:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Outgoing Taiwan president whose term ends 20 May 2016 needs to be locked from politically-ignorant editors until that date. President-elect Tsai Ing-wen already protected. HkCaGu (talk) 11:34, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This will probably blow over in a couple weeks (particularly when it is off the main page). kelapstick(bainuu) 22:19, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Persistent sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:52, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Persistent sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:52, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: CoI editing by multiple new users. --. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:58, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:59, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:55, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:57, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs keep putting that he's a free agent, while other IPs keep putting that he's a free agent. These IPs revert each other all the time. //nepaxt 20:16, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of seven days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
21 January 2016
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Very temporary full protection as content from a blocked sockpuppet is being re-added by a new suspected sock. Qed237 (talk) 14:34, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment – Protection probably not needed anymore as sockpuppet blocked, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Biar122. Qed237 (talk) 15:13, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 16:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There are alot of "perfered version"-type edits coming from two accounts and an IP on this page. The edits have come of the past few days and have spanned the spectrum, from just a few sentences changed to sources removed to total page blanking. Page protection is necessary and requested. Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC) 19:58, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Diannaa (talk) 20:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandal repeatedly adding a name he/she claims are Taylor's "husband" and siblings, w/o sourcing. Violation of WP:PRIVACY (see [38]). Quis separabit? 20:04, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:42, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 19:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Medium IP vandalism, recently a page move without consensus by a new editor (Austin Princess Driver). Please protect page and revert the recent move, move back to Planet Nine (2016 hypothesis)- Thanks. prokaryotes (talk) 18:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- I've page-move protected it (autoconfirmed, 1 week), I'm not sure it needs more protection than that at the moment - perhaps see how it goes for a bit longer? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:31, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you Mike. Currently on frontpage news, so issues like this might resolve within a week. prokaryotes (talk) 18:43, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Move protected for a week (for the bot), been a while since I last saw a WoW copycat. tutterMouse (talk) 19:13, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Please add additional page protection for edits, no IPs. Still issues (see recent article history). prokaryotes (talk) 19:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:18, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:40, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeatedly vandalized by IP and other socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FrankEM. General Ization Talk 15:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protection done by Edgar181. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:41, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Request reconsideration of indefinite PC protection as requested. This sockpuppeteer and his prolific socks have have made it their prime mission to extensively corrupt this specific article based on some strange notions about the subject, and have done so for a period of months. Three days of semi is little or no help. General Ization Talk 21:00, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Long-term protection (inc. PC) is not the appropriate solution for disruption by one sockmaster. Instead, they should be reported and blocked on sight. Deryck C. 08:53, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Request reconsideration of indefinite PC protection as requested. This sockpuppeteer and his prolific socks have have made it their prime mission to extensively corrupt this specific article based on some strange notions about the subject, and have done so for a period of months. Three days of semi is little or no help. General Ization Talk 21:00, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- FWIW, I wasn't aware of the long-term issues associated with this page when I protected it - I just saw the last day or two of disruption by IPs. I have no objection if another admin would like to extend the protection. In any case, please don't hesitate to ask for reprotection if the problem returns after three days. I've watchlisted the article and will keep an eye on it myself too. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:17, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected., let us return to this case if disruption continues.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I know it is rare for a talk page to be protected, but this page has seen a lot of sockpuppetry, and is a mess. Legal threats, incivility, personal attacks, and attempted outing. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Arifer and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Arifer/Archive. Eteethan(talk) 16:20, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semiprotection: Persistent recent disruption of the article by sockpuppet or meatpuppet accounts which are used until they accumulate warnings and then abandoned. The article has problems, and should not be protected long-term, but the current disruption effectively prevents improvement of the article. 64.105.98.115 (talk) 18:34, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 07:14, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - 112.198.90.92 (talk) 10:22, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article for upcoming release that is receiving persistent IP cruft, additions of false release dates and unsourced claims despite hidden notes. Page has already been protected twice within the last month, a lengthy protection would be beneficial. Thanks. Abi-Maria (talk) 11:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:12, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from various different ip addresses, only rarely reverted automatically. Legitimate improvements made rarely or never. Dunditschia (talk) 12:16, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:09, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 07:14, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - 112.198.90.92 (talk) 10:22, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article for upcoming release that is receiving persistent IP cruft, additions of false release dates and unsourced claims despite hidden notes. Page has already been protected twice within the last month, a lengthy protection would be beneficial. Thanks. Abi-Maria (talk) 11:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:12, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from various different ip addresses, only rarely reverted automatically. Legitimate improvements made rarely or never. Dunditschia (talk) 12:16, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:09, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent non-constructive removal of cited material in order to push a pov. Onel5969 TT me 12:43, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Please salt - article has been repeatedly deleted and created. Citobun (talk) 13:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator GB fan. — MusikAnimal talk 16:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GABHello! 16:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator WereSpielChequers. — MusikAnimal talk 16:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems as if this article is being targeted. Temp semi is needed, if it continues after the temp protection, perhaps pending changes should be considered. BLP article. Dave Dial (talk) 16:51, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Not done The article is already under pending changes. Bishonen | talk 09:39, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This or PC should do it. Previously protected, and I think it should indefinitely re-protected judging by the history. Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bishonen | talk 09:41, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection. Since July, there's been a steady, if not too frequent, stream of single-purpose users attempting to whitewash "negative" information from the article and replace it with ad copy. Because I don't foresee this problem otherwise resolving itself anytime soon - the subject has employed four different people/accounts to do this - I am asking for the page to be indefinitely semi'd. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:14, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined pace is pretty slow - probably better to just revert it for now. AlexiusHoratius 12:18, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page seems to attract the odd vandal enough to be a concern. Regards, CoconutPaste (talk) 03:17, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined - request was good at the time but looks like the vandalism has ended - article pretty quiet other than that. AlexiusHoratius 12:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- List of transgender characters in film and television (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by sock Jim1138 (talk) 09:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 07:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:14, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Marchjuly (talk) 08:31, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:12, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed shortly after protection ended. clpo13(talk) 08:40, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:10, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 11:45, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 12:07, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request protection because of a deliberate campaign to portray a mediocre performer as a top grosser, using both IPs and named accounts. With edits ranging from adding fake numbers with fake sources to "just" unsourced inflation of numbers/numbers vandalism. The article has been protected multiple times in the past, last time for three months, a protection that expired on 17 January. And the disruption is in full swing again now... Thomas.W talk 20:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 09:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC).
Semi-protection. An IP is determined to construct a fictive biography of this dead porn performer, including unsourced references to an apparently living person who he claims fathered her child. Virtually all their content is either unreliably sourced or original research based on court documents, which are referenced to the case file, not to specific documents. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by admins since 2006. (talk) 20:36, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Treating Hullaballoo good! Bishonen | talk 09:35, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Zoupan 23:46, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:57, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: MLB player rumoured to have signed a free agent contract - won't be official until the team confirms the signing and completion of a physical. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 00:34, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:58, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mlpearc (open channel) 02:32, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection Page is continually vandalized by various IPs, all of which add the same non-NPOV edits. Boomer Vial (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:03, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced/poorly sourced content to an about a recently deceased person (which may fall under WP:BLP. clpo13(talk) 06:56, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Reviewing admin: I was also submitting this same request. --Ekvastra (talk) 08:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:05, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. STSC (talk) 07:03, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:06, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mlpearc (open channel) 23:17, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 08:54, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: There are quite a few vandalism edits from IP/anon users lately, because of the recent elections and the fact that her page is linked to the front page. There appears to be vandalism from more than one source, according to the IP addresses. I would recommend making the page semi-protected until at least when the election is no longer mentioned on the front page. --AsianHippie (talk) 01:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 08:56, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Extend pending changes: NeilN is currently inactive at this time. In the meantime, despite a couple good edits by newly registered users and IP, vandalism is still persistent. George Ho (talk) 08:19, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Done. Extended for 6 months. The quality of IP / new user edits is low enough (>75% reverted) for me to think PC is appropriate, although IMO the edit volume is on the borderline of being too high for PC. Anyway I've extended PC as requested. Deryck C. 09:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: edit warring - an anonymous editor is trying to add the false information that Transylvania was a combatant in this conflict. 64.62.219.56 (talk) 13:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. — MusikAnimal talk 18:16, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is highly vandalised by IP addresses continuosly. Have a look on these diffs please [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44] and [45]. It does seems that page is an interest of WP:SOAPBOX criteria by IP vandals. . SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 13:59, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for 1 month. I read from the article that the series has finished recently, which is the likely reason it attracted so much casual fancruft and drive-by vandalism. If unhelpful IP edits come back as soon as protection expires, put in another request for an extension. Deryck C. 08:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated acts of vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:45, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:10, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – enrollment figure vandal...ongoing issue. now resorting to socks. John from Idegon (talk) 23:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Thomas Barkley (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. m.o.p 23:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – enrollment figure vandal..ongoing problem. Now resorting to socks. John from Idegon (talk) 23:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Thomas Barkley (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. m.o.p 23:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – enrollment figure vandal..ongoing problem. Now resorting to socks. John from Idegon (talk) 23:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Please note that this and the two above are related to an IP that was blocked yesterday. asking that you protect these three articles and all the other Denver area high schools on the IP's edit history. It's 73.169.85.220. If you cannot protect, please at least watch. John from Idegon (talk) 23:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Sarah Gretchen (talk · contribs) blocked by Master of Puppets. m.o.p 23:52, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs re-adding the same spam link. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 18:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:58, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – All edits from unregistered editors since August have been unhelpful at best, and outright vandalism at worst. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:38, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of blanking. GABHello! 22:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Working on a rangeblock for your guy. Katietalk 23:15, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2601:782:100:5780::/64 blocked one month for disruption. This is one network, one end user. Katietalk 23:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Full Protection indefinitely: IT Department of Patrician Brothers' requesting full protection due to unwarranted changes to page and unwarranted protection placed. Pkenyon (talk) 00:11, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. by another admin. only (talk) 03:42, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeatedly vandalized by IP and other socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FrankEM. General Ization Talk 15:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protection done by Edgar181. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:41, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Request reconsideration of indefinite PC protection as requested. This sockpuppeteer and his prolific socks have have made it their prime mission to extensively corrupt this specific article based on some strange notions about the subject, and have done so for a period of months. Three days of semi is little or no help. General Ization Talk 21:00, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Warring. One of the parties appears to have a history of edit warring, and a new IP has joined the fray. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. The IP warned, and if they continue to edit war a block will be in order — MusikAnimal talk 18:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. The IP has continued. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:29, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wgolf (talk) 21:51, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:16, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Already done. Katietalk 23:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from both IPs and registered users pertaining to the Flint water crisis. Phrases such as "Murderer" and "Flint slayer" have been added to the page. Future vandalism also anticipated as the water crisis continues to unfold. Alpha11110 (talk) 21:54, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant removal of the Controversies section on this article. . Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 22:41, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Telfordbuck (talk) 22:55, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
22 January 2016
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – too much vandalism seen in page. BRP ever 15:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:04, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent IP vandalism, villain from the new Star Wars film. — TAnthonyTalk 15:57, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Nick Number (talk) 17:34, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:09, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – After the last protection ended same thing starts again by IP's and some users. GSS (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism as a result of recent controversial comments she made about race. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 19:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:15, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going addition of original research not supported by citations within article or reliable sources anywhere; continued disruptive editing by IP's and anonymous editors. livelikemusic talk! 01:05, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:17, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edits by 77.247.224.34 mostly wrong. Copy and pasting wrong data. LordRapture (talk) 10:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
indefinite semi-protection: Persistent changing/updating the box office for the movie without sources by mostly IP editors. Also accompanying "ref name" of existing reference to support the disruptive edits without coming up with a valid/reliable source. Page has been protected at least two times in the past if I'm not mistaken.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 12:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:55, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has been the target of many IP's for adding unverified, unreferenced material. This is not normally the case, so I'm only requesting 72 hour pp please. Garchy (talk) 14:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (It's related to the current Google doodle or whatever it's called - should be over soon.) AlexiusHoratius 19:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism/Disruptive editing. MusaTalk ☻ 17:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:44, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – spam article for non-notable company, created three times in 24 hrs. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 11:24, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Anna Frodesiak.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – joke article created three times in 24 hours. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 15:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 16:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Content dispute/edit-warring by new users. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:12, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:46, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism on this comedian who is currently controversial due to "stealing jokes" according to the media. Tinton5 (talk) 07:17, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 15:26, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 15:22, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to subject's recent conviction and sentencing. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 15:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 15:23, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – 241 edits by ClueBot NG. sst✈ 05:27, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Steven Walling • talk 06:49, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated very low quality edits from IPs, unsourced or poorly sourced content has sometimes been live for several months. CFCF 💌 📧 06:22, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Steven Walling • talk 06:49, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute, disruptive edits and edit warring. It was protected on 29 Nov 2015 [46]. Now involved editors start it again [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57]. Because they're anonymous editors (IPs), I think semi-protection is enough. And there are related sections on talk page to solve it. Or they can start a new topic to reach a consensus. Zyma (talk) 07:30, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., disruption stopped on Jan 17--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing edit war between two users over the definition of Drake's musical releases. Discussion is occurring, but every time a user adds an opinion to the talk page, they revert the page back to their preferred version. Azealia911 talk 07:09, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Please can something be done about this ASAP? The edit was has now regressed from arguing in edit summaries into lines upon lines of "... reverted one edit by ...". Azealia911 talk 19:08, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- The same edit-warring between the same users over the same issue is also taking place at If You're Reading This It's Too Late, it'd be greatly appreciated if they could both be protected. Azealia911 talk 19:13, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:42, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – 265 edits by ClueBot NG. sst✈ 05:21, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Steven Walling • talk 06:14, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 251 edits by ClueBot NG. sst✈ 05:23, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Steven Walling • talk 06:15, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – 226 edits by ClueBot NG. sst✈ 05:32, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Steven Walling • talk 06:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This is the most edited page by ClueBot NG, with 400 edits. sst✈ 05:00, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 06:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – 247 edits by ClueBot NG. sst✈ 05:26, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 06:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – 238 edits by ClueBot NG. . sst✈ 05:28, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 06:14, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of non-notable members. clpo13(talk) 07:08, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 06:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent recent unsourced/vandalism from IP user, adding casting of a seventh season which hasn't been announced, adding different cast members. This page has been been given protection twice within the last two weeks, and these edits continue. -- Whats new?(talk) 21:45, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 06:08, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Virtually all anon IP and new account edits are vandalism. It's a waste of editor resources to constantly be reverting these. Montanabw(talk) 00:32, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page is frequently modified by anon user/users at the 167.56.x.x and 167.57.x.x IP ranges to violate WP:POV, changing entire article to a critical POV. Language of modifications is similar, suggesting same individuals are editing anonymously (see here, here, and here for examples). Requests to these various anon users to discuss the issue on the talk page or to create a dedicated criticism section have come to no avail. A block requiring an account to edit (I do not know which sort of block that might be) would allow this person or persons to be engaged in a manner that they can contribute to the article (i.e. add valid criticisms in a constructive manner) rather than an unending cycle of "whack-a-mole.". KNHaw (talk) 22:17, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @KNHaw: If you'll get me a list of IPs that have disrupted this article, I'll work on a rangeblock. List them on my talk page in either a column or separated by commas (no user links). May be too much collateral damage but let's give it a shot. Katietalk 05:08, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Request long term pending changes protection given the history of BLP vios and vandalism. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:44, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 05:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has been subject to a constant level of disruptive editing in the past few weeks, mostly by IP addresses that keep changing, and therefore cannot be dealt with. It is also a highly visible page, and disruption is therefore more damaging. . Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator KrakatoaKatie. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- I also blocked 2602:306:31FE:3440::/64 for one week for disruption. If he returns after the page protection expires, ping me and I'll block him longer. This is one guy. Katietalk 04:58, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued on-going disruptive editing by IP's and anonymous editors, which caused its previous blocks over the past year's time. livelikemusic talk! 00:41, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent anon ip vandalism. . JOJ Hutton 18:17, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:49, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semiprotection: A developing edit war. Please keep article on this version. --evrik (talk) 19:14, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. only (talk) 00:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Deli nk (talk) 20:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:46, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent block evasion by indeffed editor Alec Smithson. The editor changes IP frequently, so I see little value in requesting an evasion block. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:33, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:48, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. Jolicnikola (talk) 21:38, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Why is it vandalism? SLBedit (talk) 22:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- The vandalism of the Husn shujaat with a double enter. Jolicnikola (talk) 00:27, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 00:52, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful IP edits. JMHamo (talk) 22:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined. Recent edits from anonymous editors do not strike me as vandalism as much as an attempt to document recent events around the player's team affiliation. I, JethroBT drop me a line 23:47, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent IP removal of sourced content that does not match the GRG list . Legacypac (talk) 23:54, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 02:22, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:44, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Returned IP vandals after recent 1-month protection period. (*Note: I'm not logged in...). 172.56.38.229 (talk) 23:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It also appears the IP in question was recently blocked. I, JethroBT drop me a line 23:36, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 00:45, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:09, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. by another admin. only (talk) 02:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, BLP violations since last protection was lifted. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. by another admin. only (talk) 02:00, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Full protection or Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent and ongoing vandalism – Tons of IP vandalism. The page was semi-protected ("Allow only autoconfirmed users") for six months by Slon02 due to persistent vandalism. As soon as the protection expired on 25 December 2015, the vandalism orgy started again. These ip users: 79.167.164.4, 80.107.171.231, 2.85.75.79 (among many others) are vandalizing the page continuously. I strongly suggest that the protection shouldn't be just for 6 months, but permanent this time. Thank you so much for your attention. Gtrbolivar (talk) 08:41, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. by another admin. only (talk) 01:49, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Minor entry getting a wave of vandalism today, probably by students. . ~ neko-chan :3 (talk) 21:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 01:22, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. — goethean 22:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Per the outcome of the TFD, {{Non-free Wikimedia logo}} ought to be replaced with {{Copyright by Wikimedia}} in this article. The talk page is creation protected so I have to ask here. Thanks! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:40, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:46, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IPs adding original research after multiple warnings. . Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:06, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:36, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by MusikAnimal for 48 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 21:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:06, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 00:31, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This talk page has been a regular target for User:Fangusu's IP sockpuppets for about a week now. Steel1943 (talk) 22:32, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Steel1943: Given that blocks have not resolved the issue, we'll try semiprotection for a few days. Might consider suggesting a rangeblock at ANI if this persists and there is identifiable range here. I, JethroBT drop me a line 23:56, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
23 January 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism due to scoring on debut. JMHamo (talk) 16:54, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:21, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. three days by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 19:18, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 17:48, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:14, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still getting vandalism since yesterday's high traffic from Google Doodle. Bananasoldier (talk) 18:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:16, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 18:58, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:18, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism continues. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 12:00, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:04, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-level of defamatory content and unreliable information being added to an-already shaky biography of living persons. livelikemusic talk! 13:54, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Livelikemusic: See if you can find a Commons admin to close that deletion discussion for that image and salt it. They may need to block him on Commons to prevent him from uploading it again under a different file name. Katietalk 17:03, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just back from protection, more of the same. SummerPhDv2.0 16:03, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected The protection log for this article is long and distinguished. It has been protected in the past for a year at a time and disruption has resumed immediately, and I do mean immediately, almost every time. Indefinite semi-protection will save everyone a lot of time and grief here. Katietalk 16:54, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Assorted IPs keep adding the same unsourced POV rant about the origin of cowboy equipment and will not discuss. This has been a slow-moving annoyance for a couple months now. Montanabw(talk) 02:55, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an anonymous vandal abusing multiple IPs in order to insert blatant errors into the page.--Mr Fink (talk) 05:54, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has repeatedly been under extended periods of semi-protection, with disruption resuming when the protection expires. If that happens again after this protection period expires, we should consider indefinite semi-protection. MelanieN (talk) 16:49, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: to promote compliance with the policy on biographies of living people. 160.44.230.212 (talk) 14:08, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- This page is semi-protected temporarily for vandalism but it should be semi-protected indefinitely to promote compliance with the policy on biographies of living people. 160.44.230.212 (talk) 15:04, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Coffee. The BLP policy does not require indefinite semi-protection, nor does it encourage it. Katietalk 16:47, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP is removing content. They removed one album saying: "It says it will probably be released this year. Probably isn't good enough". Also showing possession over article, and have been warned about removal of content, but continue. ilovechristianmusic (Tell Me Something!) 20:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Looks like a content dispute to me.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined only (talk) 11:48, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Just fired by the Cavaliers. Qpalzmmzlapq (talk | contribs) 21:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:48, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 11:51, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not a very notable article, but vandalism on this page is rampant and in at least one case, (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Sims_Life_Stories&type=revision&diff=324908683&oldid=324187810), this vandalism remained for 6 years. SirLagsalott (talk) 21:48, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. You and I have very different definitions of "persistent vandalism" if you think that. only (talk) 11:53, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing highly-publicized current event, likely to be much false information at this stage of investigation. Coasterlover1994 00:38, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, doesn't seem to be too bad at the moment only (talk) 11:55, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – 273 edits by ClueBot NG. sst✈ 05:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 19:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism made by Lindalikeisis. The user had using profanity in local language of Brunei eg. Orang Palui mean Crazy People which referring it to Hassanal Bolkiah. Imfeelyoung (talk) 10:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined - article disruption seems to have died down. AlexiusHoratius 19:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MusaTalk ☻ 12:45, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - most of the recent stuff was from one user; report them to AIV if they continue. AlexiusHoratius 19:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated (over two months) of attempted article deletion via redirect by IP. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 13:35, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - happens once a week or so - just revert it. AlexiusHoratius 19:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – December and January edits have been mostly IP/unregistered test edits, vandalism, or removal of sourced content. — Maile (talk) 13:45, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- To further add to this request, some unregistered editors just correctly removed erroneous content that had been added by an IP this month. I stand by my request to protect this article. Or protect it so edits by those who are not autoconfirmed have to be manually accepted. — Maile (talk) 20:49, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:24, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It had been protected in the past. article is complete and to protect against vandalism. BRP ever 14:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:25, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from unregistered usedrs over the last few months. Peter Flass (talk) 14:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 20:22, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Requesting permanent semi-protection for the page since it links to (and encourages the downloading of) a .jar file that will run on users' computers which is not hosted on Wikipedia.
The potential for distributing trojans, etc., in this way is high. I wonder if some larger policy should be in place. Thanks!. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 16:55, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:27, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Continued edit warring and forum shopping by User:Matrindale and User:Francis Schonken to force their version of the Bach material into the article. Their edit warring and forum shopping have resulted in a "no close/No consensus" RfC and a follow-up RfC to be initiated. Since two previous Full Page Protections to encourage them to participate constructively in the RfC process have not worked, I am requesting that the new RfC be on Full Page Protection for one full month (30 days minus the 3 days for which the new RfC has already been running).
The RfC at Johann Sebastian Bach had 4-5 editors in support of changes with citations added to the proposed text, and two editors Opposed User:Martindale and User:Francis Schonken. User:Martindale and User:Francis were apparently displeased with the progress of that RfC and they have returned to edit warring and forum shopping on the page and trying to force their version of the edit into the article. This was despite the caution warning from User:Softl to User:Francis Schonken to follow RfC policy and wait for a result. In addition, two previous Full Page Protections from User:Ymblanter and User:MusikA, for User:Martindale and User:Francis to stop edit warring and to encourage them to either participate in the RfC and await its outcome have been ignored. The two editors have refused to do this and have continued to set aside the warning made to them, and to force their version of the edit into the article against Wikipedia policy and guidelines. User:Martindale, having knowledge of the open RFC, then began forum shopping on the DRN page which does not allow DRN when an RFC is open, and unfortunately managed to hook-in one of the unsuspecting editors there into doing the "no close/no consensus" demi-close on the old RfC. When I rewrote the RfC, then User:Martindale defaced the new RfC by pointing to his improperly formed DRN which he had started against DRN policy. The effect was to scare off and deflect all editors from responding to the inital RFC announcement for the new RfC. I have spent an hour or two rewriting the RFC to make it at least look like a somewhat normal RFC, though the damage done by their nullifying the initial RFC announcement and in effect turning-away the 50-60 editors who normally would have responded to the initial RFC announcement (see the page counts for that day on the Bach Talk Page) likely can not be recovered without re-doing the RFC a third time. User:Francis continues his forum shopping at this time by opening Edit Request sections on the Talk page at Bach which appear to want to further subvert the RfC which has been clearly posted and announced there.
Requessting here that the page should be restored to the version previously protected by User:Ymblanter and Full Page Protection for 30 days for the new RfC is requested because of persistent edit warring and forum shopping by User:Martindale and User:Francis Schonken now over three times. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 18:08, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Ask User:MusikAnimal if he is inclined to extend the 5-day full protection he imposed at Bach. If not, I recommend you try to find consensus on the talk page. The tone of this request suggests WP:Battleground thinking on your part. In a case where an RfC has been closed with no consensus, we can either hope for a lucky outcome from further negotiation, or accept leaving the status quo in place for a while. If warring on the article continues after protection expires, that may be time to start considering blocks for those who aren't using patience in the negotiation. EdJohnston (talk) 18:57, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- @EdJohnston: If a 5-day extension is preferable then that is fine. I am trying to keep this as a peaceful RfC discussion on the Talk page. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 19:09, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – I might be asking for a bit much here, but this page is a constant target for sneaky vandalism. Not a high pace of vandalism, just a constant low boil of minor number changes. In the last month there were 35 edits and only 2 constructive edits ([58]). At most it needs updating maybe every 3 months as the various agencies release number updates. I would be nice not to have to worry about this page. Requesting pending changes or long-term autoconfirm level. Ping me if there are any questions. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 18:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:52, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – several IP vandals. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 21:17, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:48, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Gfoley4 . Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Keep the IPs off due to MEATpuppetry. Legacypac (talk) 23:09, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:06, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amaury (talk) 01:01, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:21, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent edit warring. NYBrook098 (talk) 02:20, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:20, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Possible sockpuppetry with this as well as it seems each time it was made by a different user. Wgolf (talk) 02:59, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:08, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism. This is being done by students at the high school (where I teach). Please restrict to registered users at least temporarily. yayfrogs
Temporary Semi-protection: Edit warring by IPs. Criticism section: addition of blog and forum sourced as well as removal of RS sourced Jim1138 (talk) 03:27, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: The annual event happens Sunday and vandals seem to strike this article and introduce factual errors regarding past events each year around this time.LM2000 (talk) 03:31, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:43, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute over location of origin has triggered edit-war over the last day or so. Temporary protection till it cools off would help. . Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:17, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:41, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism Taffe316 (talk) 04:46, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:06, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - 112.198.102.157 (talk) 07:38, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:13, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism and disruptive editing. Melonkelon (talk) 07:59, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:16, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism attacks by different IPs, such as these[59], [60], and [61]. Boomer VialHolla 09:36, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:18, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
pending changes: level 1 : quite often editors want to edit this page to what they think are the correct formulas while it is correct as it is now.WillemienH (talk) 10:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:04, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – more vandalism. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 12:04, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:19, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More vandalism 112.198.101.237 (talk) 12:16, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:21, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More vandalism 112.198.101.237 (talk) 12:16, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
24 January 2016
Temp semi-protection - Article deals with a recent criminal court case in Canada, which has received a great deal of media attention. Numerous edits have been made by anonymous user, editorializing (in particular, putting "scare quotes" around words to imply sarcasm) and degrading the overall quality of the article. Requesting that due to the nature of the page, it be semi-protected until the media frenzy dies down and the facts of the outcome of the case are not so hotly contested. Kakarott (talk) 02:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined There are some productive IP editors there. Nobody had even warned the disruptive editor from today. Please discuss with/warn this IP where necessary. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been vandalized repeatedly by anons who have persisted in adding people/s picture even after it has been agreed against them, and we have explained further in the article's Talk Page and edits comments. . Caballero/Historiador ⎌ 04:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: User out of mexico. 201.141.249.35, 201.141.149.140,and 201.141.249.35 keeps using multiple iPs to disrupt the page and switch around the genres. I dealt with this guy on RYM (He was banned for using multiple accounts to vote on genres. https://rateyourmusic.com/admin/queue/sugq/?req_id=17439&req_id=17439) some he has followed me here. Fruitloop11 (talk) 07:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 15:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Temp semi-protection - Article was subject to COI editing by User:BankVic1974, who was username blocked. Now a new editor, User:Minden jacob, is making the same edits and appears to be either a sock of BV1974 or another editor with the same COI. BMK (talk) 23:55, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined Your guy is autoconfirmed - has been here since 2012 and passed the 10 edit threshold today. Hie thee to SPI so they can get the sleepers. Katietalk 03:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Beyond My Ken and KrakatoaKatie: Took it to SPI. Investigation here. Dat GuyTalkContribs 14:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistently vandalised by IPs, and I think will continue to happen while he is in CBB, then die down. Boleyn (talk) 16:28, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There appear to be some IP editors who are trying to edit productively. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nat Gertler (talk) 16:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:15, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unsourced/unexplained changes by IPs. . SummerPhDv2.0 07:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP addresses making false edits. Request for a one year semi-protection. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 07:56, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Distuptive editing seems to come and go in spurts. Not enough consistent IP distruption to bar all IP/new editors from article for a year. However, pending protection should help. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Galileo affair and Galileo Galilei
- Talk:Galileo affair (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
- Galileo affair (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Talk:Galileo Galilei (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
- Galileo Galilei (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary but semi-longtime semi-protection: High and long-time persistent level of IP vandalism by restoration of removed article edits and talk page comments by ever reappearing socks of indef blocked Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Azul411/Archive. DVdm (talk) 15:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Done Galileo affair was already protected; I semi-protected the talk page for three days. I see no current disruption at Galileo Galilei and its talk page.Ymblanter (talk) 15:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: thanks. But perhaps you misread? I count 6 different IPs in the last 5 days at Talk:Galileo Galilei. - DVdm (talk) 15:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Indeed, I must have looked two times at the article. Protected the talk page for three days as well.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, thx! - DVdm (talk) 15:47, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Indeed, I must have looked two times at the article. Protected the talk page for three days as well.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: thanks. But perhaps you misread? I count 6 different IPs in the last 5 days at Talk:Galileo Galilei. - DVdm (talk) 15:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A significant number of destructive edits from multiple IP addresses over the course of today (January 24th). Temporary semi-protection should hopefully resolve the issue for now.
Entranced98 (talk) 16:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP is adding large amount of WP:OR and removing references. . Vin09 (talk) 07:26, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – persistent edit-warring between two IP editors, does not seem like they want to compromise. Boomer VialHolla 10:11, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:37, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP socking. Krakkos (talk) 11:26, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I suggest to protect from IP addresses, which prevent editing IP addresses, but users are automatically approved, as has just been a case where a single IP user wrote that the actors are gay. Lukaslt13 --Talk 15:21, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A fair amount of IP vandalism, occurring once every few days, from different IP addresses. It is often affecting the lede section, and usually involves removal of information that the anonymous IPs don't like (for instance this removal of her American citizenship or this removal of the fact that she is a gay icon). In affecting the lede, such vandalism clearly impacts on how the article (currently undergoing a GAN) will be viewed by its wider readership. Semi-protecting this page should deal with this problem. Midnightblueowl (talk) 15:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too infrequently edited for semi-protection--Ymblanter (talk) 15:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Should be creation protection; I've set up a global userpage but it should be enforced by way of indef creation protection after it's deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Courcelles: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- The request has been fulfilled but Courcelles used the wrong template.
Requesting immediate archiving... BethNaught (talk) 14:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Around 15 reverts in half a day. Dat GuyTalkContribs 11:57, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:11, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Firebrace (talk) 14:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 14:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Dennis Bratland (talk) 15:28, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Dennis you reverted the article one minute after making this request. How the hell can you justify making a request to lock an article based on edit warring and then revert it yourself? Because of a content issue you're picking and choosing rules in an underhand and deceptive way, just to try and get your own way? Thats real classy. Zachlita (talk) 17:31, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined This is being handled at AN3. Katietalk 03:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Temp semi-protection Persistent puerile, BLP violation edits. Notwithstanding current vandalism, this appears to be a long term issue for the article. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:23, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 03:28, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- List of Billboard Mainstream Top 40 number-one songs of 2005 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Two new user accounts (created within the past two hours), making similar kinds of edits where they introduce false info, as can be verified thru the references in the article. [62] [63] Reverted both edits, but this article has become unstable since the beginning of the year at the hands of sockpuppets who seem to have a leaning toward Green Day music based on their editing (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stumpwentz/Archive), and I have suspicion these two new users are more in a growing line of them. MPFitz1968 (talk) 02:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Will respect that a request to semi-protect this article was recently declined, but the problem with recent edits still exists. Please consider how stable this article was prior to January 1, 2016, and the reverted edits that have occurred since ... and by users named in that sockpuppet investigation link I mentioned above, plus the two users whose edit diffs I also cite. MPFitz1968 (talk) 02:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 03:30, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed shortly after protection expired on the 16th. The vandalism is of course due to a certain ultra-high-profile presidential campaign. Everymorning (talk) 04:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 07:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As with Wilbur Scoville, high levels of vandalism continue after Friday's or Thursday's Google Doodle bringing high traffic. Vandalism persistent after recent semi protection wore off. Bananasoldier (talk) 06:57, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 07:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 14 days, persistent vandalism by IP-hopper. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 07:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. clpo13(talk) 17:18, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined I would, but your guy will be autoconfirmed tomorrow, so it won't help. I gave him the level 3 BLP warning; if he reverts you again, warn him for edit warring and go from there. Katietalk 23:09, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion by User:Chowkatsun9, using many sock accounts. Also affected are the bios of Robin Gibb, Maurice Gibb and more. Binksternet (talk) 21:12, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined Wouldn't help because your guy is autoconfirmed. WP:SPI is thataway. Katietalk 22:55, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Request for temporary (say ~1 month) semi-protection to discourage repeated entreaties by IP address looking to pull me into drama that I've already thrown the towel in on. Admins having to come by and revert the addition repeatedly only causes me notices that I do not need. Hasteur (talk) 01:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 03:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: like Mariah Carey's disco & Madonna's disco, these lists are prone to a lot of fandom based IP vandalism. I personally, as well a few colleagues of mine look after said music articles and as you can see here, the overwhelming majority of IP edits are nonsense, and make it more difficult to protect the articles integrity. I understand the article doesn't have daily revert wars, but it is a high profile artist and I think a indef semi is in our best interest--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 01:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 03:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. SLBedit (talk) 20:50, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:59, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful anon edits that need reverting. JMHamo (talk) 21:20, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:54, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been vandalised by 1 IP, who had repeatedly blanked the page. It has been blocked for 31 hours, but I fear this will happen again when it comes back. Also, it's a static IP, so the person can create multiple IP's, so it needs protection. Class455fan1 (talk) 22:40, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Not done – blocking is sufficient for only one vandal. — Earwig talk 22:49, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Winner 42 Talk to me! 02:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Talk page of a salted page that keep on getting recreated. Wgolf (talk) 02:48, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The subject, who has recently launched a company, is attempting to fluff the article. "Made entry more concise as written by Tommy Funderburk on 01.21.16" and later "Tommy Funderburk wanted this section cut". Prior to that Wtylerallen (talk · contribs) and an anon edited the article to insert what appeared to be a press release. There are problems with the musician's biography, but the subject is not helping to improve it.
. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined. Semi-protection would not help since the editor in question is autoconfirmed. I see that you have warned them; that is the avenue that will have to be pursued if they persist. MelanieN (talk) 16:31, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Kannad scripts are being added back frequently by some users whom I suspect to be sockpuppets...Pls lock this article for preventing further edit warring. arun talk 16:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see some slow-motion edit warring on a couple of issues, but no attempt to discuss the issues on the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 16:38, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sneaky vandalism by IP editors and one user (who just logged out to continue vandalizing). Also changes to infobox colors counter to WP:COLOR. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 20:01, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- User is now socking. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:11, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SQLQuery me! 22:52, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 22:18, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Earwig talk 22:52, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Content dispute. Will try to resolve in talk page, but judging by the edit summary it is on verge of personal attacks. Dat GuyTalkContribs 22:25, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
25 January 2016
Semi-protection: Rogue IP editing. Jeni (talk) 11:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 213.105.158.209 constant vandalism. . Hot Pork Pie 15:21, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:07, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: This is a formerly non-notable porn actor who recently received one of the top awards (Male Performer of the Year from XBIZ). He now clearly passes WP:PORNBIO#1 on this basis. There is a draft, Draft:Ryan Driller, by Rebecca1990 which has been rejected twice based on a misreading of WP:PRIMARY: the reviewers doubted that he really received the award because the fact that he received it was cited to the granting organization's press release, as opposed to a secondary source. However this is clearly a "straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge" which WP:PRIMARY permits. Since Steve Harvey does not work for XBIZ, it's not plausible to suppose that the organization was wrong about whom it selected as Male Performer of the Year. Sammy1339 (talk) 18:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotected due to the change in circumstances. BethNaught (talk) 19:51, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Funcrunch (talk) 02:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 02:18, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Only: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:30, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- You're wrong, bot! only (talk) 03:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Did you do semi-prot or PC-prot? tutterMouse (talk) 10:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Only used the wrong template, they applied semi as requested.
Requesting immediate archiving... BethNaught (talk) 19:55, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Only used the wrong template, they applied semi as requested.
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP edits due to rumours about him leaving Chelsea. JMHamo (talk) 17:12, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:57, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Already a high volume of vandalism leading up to Super Bowl 50; two-week semi-protection recommended. DPH1110 (talk) 17:13, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 18:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Gfoley4: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - see edit history. Josh Freed (talk) 17:54, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced edits. Article is a maximum developed one, so there will not be problems with indefinite protection. . Charles Turing (talk) 18:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:51, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:54, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Galileo affair revisited already
Temporary but longtime semi-protection: Again, high and long-time persistent level of IP vandalism by restoration of removed article edits and talk page comments by ever reappearing socks of indef blocked Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Azul411/Archive. Page protection of Talk:Galileo affair just expired (see [64]), IP back at it: [65].
Longtime full-protection: long-time persistent level of vandalism by removal of content. - DVdm (talk) 13:02, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined full protection for the article. SPI is thataway. There is no indication of protection of the talk page in the logs - Ymblanter protected Talk:Galileo Galilei, not the page you've inquired about. Nonetheless, since there's so much socking I held my nose and the talk page is
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Any administrator may decrease that protection at any time without consulting me if they feel it's too long. Katietalk 15:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection expired and the bad edits started back up again. Same problem. Introduction of anime characters to the list of people killed by Japan. Majora (talk) 16:07, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Done by Shirik. BethNaught (talk) 17:15, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Today an entire nest of accounts / various IPs making unconstructive edits on the page. Horseless Headman (talk) 16:46, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 17:13, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It is a rather controversial redirect. Consensus in Talk:Cmd.exe is to redirect it to Cmd.exe but looking at the history, I see the famous edit-warrior User:Mdrnpndr (formerly Dogmaticeclectic!, now blocked) once prevented the consensus from taking effect. I tried to do it today, but 73.40.108.10 (a harassment-only IP) tried to disrupt me. (Materialscientist has blocked 73.40.108.10 in the past). To prevent IP-hopping, however, protection is needed. Codename Lisa (talk) 17:28, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - only a couple edits a few hours ago, before that pretty quiet. Re-list if disruption worsens. AlexiusHoratius 02:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Consider it relisted. No surprise. With 73.40.108.10, it always gets worse. You know: WP:EVADE. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 07:19, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Never mind. WP:AN3 has taken over. Thanks. Codename Lisa (talk) 08:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Consider it relisted. No surprise. With 73.40.108.10, it always gets worse. You know: WP:EVADE. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 07:19, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple anons removing CSD tags. —teb728 t c 04:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Gilliam. Materialscientist (talk) 10:56, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This has had to be deleted 5 times. Boleyn (talk) 10:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Done Materialscientist (talk) 10:55, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Materialscientist: This page had to be deleted once today and 4 times... 10 years ago! Salting was in no way necessary. The deletion conversation more than sufficiently handled the situation and Boleyn should have been directed there.Cebr1979 (talk) 12:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Salting in this situation was the reasonable thing to do, five recreations is still five attempts and failures even if they're a decade apart. There's little to say the same thing wouldn't happen again, if we had five AfDs on this article there'd be no question about salting. tutterMouse (talk) 12:48, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Materialscientist: This page had to be deleted once today and 4 times... 10 years ago! Salting was in no way necessary. The deletion conversation more than sufficiently handled the situation and Boleyn should have been directed there.Cebr1979 (talk) 12:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Lists of South Korean idol groups
- List of South Korean idol groups (1990s) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of South Korean idol groups (2000s) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of South Korean idol groups (2010s) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Full protection: Persistent vandalism/Disruptive editing and edit warring. The pages in question was originally by agreed by consensus that it would be a bulleted list on each page without the unnecessary information overload. Every time someone tries to go back to it, someone turns the pages back into a table layout. Further more, even with the pages as tables and with information overload there is always someone edit warring with information both minor edits and major edits. I'm requesting that the pages should be returned to their original bulleted list state. Most of these idol groups aren't particularly notable and without a page of their own in the English Wikipedia. Could we have it so that these pages are highly protected in some way? (I do hope I'm doing this request right) Alicia leo86 (talk) 18:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 02:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Harassment from dynamic IP. clpo13(talk) 05:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Note: Checking with the user first. SQLQuery me! 05:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We've had a spate of anonymous IP vandalism lately, protection may help. Thanks. Dbrodbeck (talk) 22:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 02:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Full-protect until discussion is complete and consensus is reached regarding the content under dispute. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 20:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of disruption . JMHamo (talk) 21:23, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:58, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing of false tour dates. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 21:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive edits by IPs, adding wrong year of birth etc, a type of edits that have been going on for years. The article was last protected in September-October last year, and has been fairly "quiet" since then, but the disruptive edits have now resumed. Thomas.W talk 21:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Long term problems with fancruft and vandalism, with the article previously being protected for up to 6 months. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:23, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:34, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 21:47, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. one week by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 02:36, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Human3015 I'm up all night to get lucky 22:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:37, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term socking + vandalism. GABHello! 22:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mlpearc (open channel) 00:03, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:43, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP dumps repeatedly rejected fringe POV versions of article to talk page. Constantine ✍ 18:24, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:26, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP dumps repeatedly rejected fringe POV versions of article to talk page. Constantine ✍ 18:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:25, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Article was previously protected for 10 days but on expiration IP vandalism has almost immediately resumed. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 18:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term pattern of bizarre vandalism. GABHello! 22:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 02:27, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring and disruptive behavior by anon IPs. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 23:00, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Another Bronx IP has joined in: [66]. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 23:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator EdJohnston.. only (talk) 02:22, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Given the nature of Watkins' offenses and the high amount of vandalism over the past weeks, I think this page needs indefinite semi-protection. I haven't seen any helpful IP edits that weren't reverting vandalism. clpo13(talk) 23:37, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some sort of vandalism involving One Direction. /wiae /tlk 02:05, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 02:16, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Football player having a tough game tonight. People will calm down in a day or two. EricEnfermero (Talk) 02:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 02:14, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
26 January 2016
Indefinite semi-protection: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_3#500.2F30. nableezy - 19:36, 25 January 2016 (UTC) 19:36, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. A wave of IP editors (186.214.109.194; 93.221.243.65; 180.244.47.144; 177.133.174.67; 93.221.213.89; 84.183.99.216; 199.185.67.239; 84.183.97.124; 84.139.123.154; 84.139.114.106; 219.89.19.22; 84.139.119.116) has kept emerging and making the same controversial edits over and over again. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 20:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continous reversion by IP range 1.39.* beginning from 3 Jan 2016. The Discoverer (talk) 15:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 20:16, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. by another admin. only (talk) 21:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – New accounts edit-warring to insert POV in this article about a recently concluded trial. . Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 20:43, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:54, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from a number of different IP addresses. - David Biddulph (talk) 20:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 21:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent non-constructive editing by various IP's, mostly just vandalism. Request protection for a month or more.
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Three Five additions of fake casting details by different IP addresses in the past twelve hours, including two three identical additions from different IPs. McGeddon (talk) 09:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Concur: I came to this page to request semi-protection for reasons described above, and found a request has already been submitted. mwalimu59 (talk) 15:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:08, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Google Doodle related vandalism. Safiel (talk) 17:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No transfer of player, but media speculation is driving premature edits. Requesting 2 weeks. Shreerajtheauthor (talk) 17:36, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Increasing levels of IP vandalism, likely due to the controversial nature of topics surrounding Cyrus herself. The article is being worked on to become a GA candidate, and excessive vandalism that surpasses good faith edits would compromise its stability. WikiRedactor (talk) 17:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:58, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and POV editing, including most recent addition of copyright violations from an unacceptable source. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- I count 4 instances of IP disruption in the past day. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:20, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Vandalism is pervasive over a much longer period of time than 24 hours. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent attempts over time by IP editors who either add copvio content or promotional content. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:18, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:03, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ideological edit warring (womens' rights / feminism) . Stuartyeates (talk) 18:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:06, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. tamil 05:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, Not vandalism, and please don't assert ownership of articles. Furthermore, semi-protection would do nothing because everyone that's edited it are autoconfirmed. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 14:42, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The 50th anniversary of the disappearance has triggered vandalism. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 14:16, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Out of 3 recent IP edits, 2 look to be in good faith. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 15:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request pending change be moved to semiprot. Heavy vandalism due to subject being featured by Google today. -- ferret (talk) 19:06, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:14, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent racist vandalism from a range of IPs. – Smyth\talk 19:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:53, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandals. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 19:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:54, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Major and persistent vandalism. SirLagsalott (talk) 22:55, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nothing in past 5 days —GFOLEY FOUR!— 14:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Unconstructive edits by several different IPs over the course of today (January 25th); semi-protection should sort it out.
Entranced98 (talk) 23:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like it was only two users vandalizing and they've stopped. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 14:37, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: I don't know if it really is a problem or some kind of mockery, but various IPs (from India, Brazil, US, Iran...) have been erroneously and persistently changing the album's personnel in the last two years. The page was protected for three months before, but the vandalism seem to be still ongoing.--Retrohead (talk) 16:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SLBedit (talk) 04:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 15:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 15:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive IP editing. /wiae /tlk 16:38, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. and
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, BLP violations. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 12:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 14:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP vandalism expressing disapproval of something or other. DBaK (talk) 12:53, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 14:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, unsourced trade talk, as is typical of athletes' bios. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 14:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 14:58, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Permanent protection: Persistent vandalism. Not user requestbut is subject, and was vandalised Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- I too have reverted vandalism on Jacona's page, but protection is kinda his call, no? John from Idegon (talk) 18:58, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, as above. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 03:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Gfoley4: The user thanked me for this edit. Wouldn't that seem as confirmation? Dat GuyTalkContribs 06:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Jacona and I have had a specific conversation about protecting his userpage. They didn't want it then, and I doubt they want it now. John from Idegon (talk) 07:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Gfoley4: The user thanked me for this edit. Wouldn't that seem as confirmation? Dat GuyTalkContribs 06:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Re-requesting, talk page discussion stalled, Continued disruptive edits regarding Current and Past members. PC would also help. Mlpearc (open channel) 01:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe a month or so, in hope the band will issue an official statement that will clear up current status. Mlpearc (open channel) 01:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Dat GuyTalkContribs 09:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Confusing, may use in a lot of Wikipedia articles at a same time. 333-blue 11:59, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, not sure what you mean with "confusing." Additionally, only transculded 19 times right now. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 03:42, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by a dynamic 2606.* IP address. McGeddon (talk) 20:25, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- This is not needed. There is no edit war, as the reverts were only three times. Instead, McGeddon please begin removing Original Research. 2606:6000:610A:9000:9DF6:CC8D:592B:1AE (talk) 00:18, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. And if this was going to be protected, it would be fully protected, not semi (Can't protect the The Wrong Version) —GFOLEY FOUR!— 03:37, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, only one user —GFOLEY FOUR!— 03:43, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Are you sure it isn't worth protecting, Gfoley4? Even if it is just one person, the user not only repeatedly replaces content with attached citations with completely unsourced content, but also claims to be Mike Henry himself, which likely indicates a WP:Conflict of interest if such identity claims are true. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- I agree that the edits are concerning, but in cases of where the is only one editor making these edits, a block would be more appropriate. If the user continues, they probably will be blocked. Also, the user is only two edits from being autoconfirmed, making semi-protection moot. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 03:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- I see. It wouldn't surprise me if the user ends up getting blocked for such edits. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- I agree that the edits are concerning, but in cases of where the is only one editor making these edits, a block would be more appropriate. If the user continues, they probably will be blocked. Also, the user is only two edits from being autoconfirmed, making semi-protection moot. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 03:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Are you sure it isn't worth protecting, Gfoley4? Even if it is just one person, the user not only repeatedly replaces content with attached citations with completely unsourced content, but also claims to be Mike Henry himself, which likely indicates a WP:Conflict of interest if such identity claims are true. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Persistent disruptive editing, persistent vandalism by unregistered and registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 8:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's seem to like him as a punching bag. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 m, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 03:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Lots of IPs and one new account in the past day. A. Parrot (talk) 03:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 03:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: NeilN is inactive right now. Out of all IP edits, only one is good this month. The rest were reverted. George Ho (talk) 01:03, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:14, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The PC protection actually wasn't set to expire until January 31, but I extended it another 3 months. MelanieN (talk) 01:14, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent additions of fake and unverified charts by IPs and new users. It has been a recurring problem for over a month now, and has only gotten worse for the past week. Kokoro20 (talk) 03:45, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:18, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism in the past day. /wiae /tlk 04:35, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:21, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, persistent vandalism by unregistered users. Donnowin1 (talk) 06:18, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – continuously vandalised by Gsfdpuisbfui12 possibly needs temporary protection whilst facts are confirmed. . Hot Pork Pie 20:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Done It was deleted instead. only (talk) 00:36, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism issues by unregistered.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 8:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:06, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Page was vandalized 8 years ago. CoconutPaste (talk), 15:00, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- CoconutPaste doesn't mention it here, but protecting admin Tanthalas39 last edited in 2008, and the protecting edit summary mentions another admin who, after a username change, edited for a while but retired in 2010: this is definitely the right place to come. Normally I would fulfill the request without question, but these Disney movies are routinely the targets of a long-term disruptive user, so I don't know if this is a good idea. Other admins, note that CoconutPaste is a new account, but his editing patterns make me confident that he's unrelated to the disruptive user. Nyttend (talk) 15:11, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- I feel 4 days is a long time to have a request open, is it a decline if no admin seems willing to unprotect? tutterMouse (talk) 17:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- I think this is a
Not done. Given the LTA I don't think this is a good idea and per tutterMouse nobody else seems to either. BethNaught (talk) 20:03, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- I think this is a
- I feel 4 days is a long time to have a request open, is it a decline if no admin seems willing to unprotect? tutterMouse (talk) 17:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Over the last four months, on at least 15 occasions (7 of which in the last two days), different IPs have replaced the content of the page with that of a different Aaron Carpenter (a YouTuber). A recent protection did not dissuade IP vandals. Requesting longer term protection. Recent diffs (last 2 days): 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Older diffs: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 . —Laoris (talk) 04:56, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 19:59, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary (but longer than simply a couple days) semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, persistent vandalism by unregistered users.Cebr1979 (talk) 07:03, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Done by Yamaguchi. BethNaught (talk) 19:56, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. tamil 12:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 19:08, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
27 January 2016
Semi-protection: Reccuring IP vandalism. For background, see section about "The Tienanment Square Protests of 1989" in talk page. Nxavar (talk) 09:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. It's not vandalism to revert a change that doesn't have consensus. If the dispute continues, full protection may be necessary, but we're not going to give you an advantage over the IP who clearly disagrees with you. Katietalk 10:03, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- The IP user disagrees but he does not bring forward any reasons. So WP:Consensus does not apply here. Also, I did start a discussion in the talk pages two days ago, and no response was made to my post. This kind of content removal is considered WP:Vandalism. Nxavar (talk) 12:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Nxavar, I was going to make a similar comment to that of KrakatoaKatie. As for content, the statement you repeated added is misleading. I've removed it, also. And, it's not considered WP:Vandalism if possibly in good faith, even if it were disruptive. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:15, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- The IP user disagrees but he does not bring forward any reasons. So WP:Consensus does not apply here. Also, I did start a discussion in the talk pages two days ago, and no response was made to my post. This kind of content removal is considered WP:Vandalism. Nxavar (talk) 12:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Edit warring. '''tAD''' (talk) 12:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Player has just signed for new club so some discruptive edits. Qed237 (talk) 14:55, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:31, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just this morning (or evening UK) this page has been vandalized and reverted more than ten times by users, anons and suck-puppets. . Caballero/Historiador ⎌ 17:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, nonsense editing. 79616gr (talk) 17:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @79616gr: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:47, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Multiple IPs over last 2 weeks with consistent edit pattern of involving changing the scoring of the game. UW Dawgs (talk) 17:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:45, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs consistently active on the page and intend to add contents from unreliable sources for promoting particular caste or community. SMahenS (Talk) 17:56, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 18:59, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 19:36, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:42, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 09:30, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 11:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of spam links by IP editors (in fact probably a single IP editor, given the IPs are consistently in the 49.244.0.0/16 range, but I don't think we want to block that entire range). [67][68][69][70][71]. —me_and 13:42, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent addition of spam links. . Chamith (talk) 14:00, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:01, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Wooping amount of edit-warring Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:58, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Dear lord, this amount of edit-warring. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:03, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Lists of South Korean idol groups
- List of South Korean idol groups (1990s) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of South Korean idol groups (2000s) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of South Korean idol groups (2010s) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Full protection: I would like to reopen this request because persistent vandalism/disruptive editing and edit warring ever since the creation of these pages. The pages in question was originally by agreed by consensus that it would be a bullet-ed list on each page without the unnecessary information overload. Every time someone tries to go back to it, someone turns the pages back into a table layout. Further more, even with the pages as tables and with information overload there is always someone edit warring with information both minor edits and major edits. I'm requesting that the pages should be returned to their original bullet-ed list state. Most of these idol groups aren't particularly notable and without a page of their own in the English Wikipedia. Could we have it so that these pages are highly protected in some way? Alicia leo86 (talk) 11:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- I'll let someone else handle it, but like I said to Alicia leo86 on my talk page: The last revert I see on the 2000s is on January 18...January 11 for 2010s...October 28 for 1990s. DOesn't seem too disruptive to me. only (talk) 11:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Only, I do apologize for reopening the request. However, it comes off highly disruptive when people are constantly editing the pages and removing information and links. I might be incredibly bias here but not only is it disruptive, it is highly annoying to people who are trying to have some sort of consistency to these pages. These pages never remain consistent. Much of this information is rather unnecessary and not notable. Information like Gender, Agency, Number of Members, Sub-units, Japanese Debut date, when they disbanded and other information tidbits can be easily found in their wikipedia pages which is only one click away. Having it in a table is a sure fire way for constant disruptive editing. Alicia leo86 (talk) 11:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Then put it in bullet form. Protection isn't needed to change the form of it. two of the articles have been in table form since October. One since December. only (talk) 11:54, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- They'll only change it back. K-pop fans seem obsessed with the use of tables in these sorts of articles. Alicia leo86 (talk) 15:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Then put it in bullet form. Protection isn't needed to change the form of it. two of the articles have been in table form since October. One since December. only (talk) 11:54, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Only, I do apologize for reopening the request. However, it comes off highly disruptive when people are constantly editing the pages and removing information and links. I might be incredibly bias here but not only is it disruptive, it is highly annoying to people who are trying to have some sort of consistency to these pages. These pages never remain consistent. Much of this information is rather unnecessary and not notable. Information like Gender, Agency, Number of Members, Sub-units, Japanese Debut date, when they disbanded and other information tidbits can be easily found in their wikipedia pages which is only one click away. Having it in a table is a sure fire way for constant disruptive editing. Alicia leo86 (talk) 11:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Applies to all. And we don't protect pages against what someone might do tomorrow. Katietalk 09:54, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by several IPs and new SPAs. RolandR (talk) 00:42, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
I request this article into a semi-protected page because of Persistent vandalism, Repeated vandalism and Persistent disruptive editing created by several IPs and new registered users.RenRen070193 04:26, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 09:55, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 199.231.188.244 (talk) 04:41, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, The Ip has been blocked and hasn't edited its page since then. And technically, it's allowed to blank its own page if it wants. only (talk) 11:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Please revert to [72] and lock from further BLP violations. Dennis Bratland (talk) 06:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Instead of removing the controversial assertions about a living person, the editors are going back and forth, tagging the claims with {{disputed-inline}}, instead of removing them until consensus is reached, in violation of WP:BLP and WP:NOCONSENSUS. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:23, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, sorry for not reacting earlier but for the time being all parties participate in the talk page discussion, and there is no IP/new editor disruption. If edit-warring resumes, full protection might be in order.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Certains users remove parts of the article for no apparent reason. LordRapture (talk) 23:02, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, content dispute, please take it to the talk page--Ymblanter (talk) 08:30, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since a certain editor keeps doing a logged out revert I think it's better to protect this page. Krystaleen 01:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, looks like this disruption stopped. Sorry for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:31, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adam9007 (talk) 01:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This is following the expiration of a previous page protection. Yeepsi (talk) 03:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 11:31, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full-protection Persistent disruptions An editor repeatedly reverts the entire page to a revision which adds sources that do not support the chart peaks he adds. I've taken the a matter to AN/I, but it may take sometime before these disruptions are prevented.--Harout72 (talk) 04:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If ANI ends quicker, anyone can adjust the protection. only (talk) 11:30, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: The page was blocked in 2010 as the actress was barely notable. However, the actress since then has appeared in much more and I would like to do an article. I have asked once before, but I got ignored. Thanks. Grangehilllover (talk) 23:27, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Do you have a draft prepared? tutterMouse (talk) 10:32, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, Yes. I'm almost done. Thanks. Grangehilllover (talk) 13:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- When you've completed it, make an article in userspace or within the Draft namespace so an admin can move it into mainspace. tutterMouse (talk) 15:32, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hi,
- When you've completed it, make an article in userspace or within the Draft namespace so an admin can move it into mainspace. tutterMouse (talk) 15:32, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, Yes. I'm almost done. Thanks. Grangehilllover (talk) 13:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm really not understanding it as these articles are confusing. Can the page not be just unprotected? Grangehilllover (talk) 16:28, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- No, usually if you want a page unprotected because you feel the subject is now notable then a draft article is helpful to get it unprotected as then at least you're showing evidence that an article is viable and that it'll pass notability guidelines. If the processes I showed you are too complex to understand then the article wizard tool will also help. tutterMouse (talk) 17:06, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hi,
I've submitted an edit request if that's any good. Grangehilllover (talk) 19:14, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- It won't be, you've already got one request here. tutterMouse (talk) 19:36, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- I'll give you the super easiest way to put your draft article up so we can see it; click on this link in red, copypaste your article into the window and hit save page like any page you'd create. You shouldn't need to put a link to it here but you may want to so a passing admin can see it. tutterMouse (talk) 07:09, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hi,
- I'll give you the super easiest way to put your draft article up so we can see it; click on this link in red, copypaste your article into the window and hit save page like any page you'd create. You shouldn't need to put a link to it here but you may want to so a passing admin can see it. tutterMouse (talk) 07:09, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
That was much easier, thanks! I've done it. Grangehilllover (talk) 16:48, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Grangehilllover: My strong advice is that you take this draft through Articles for creation (AfC) – they will unsalt this page for you if they approve it. (If you want, I can put an AfC template at the top of the draft for you.) On my end, I don't think your sourcing is quite strong enough yet to take this draft into mainspace yet... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Pinging Grangehilllover again about this, the steps to go through AFC confused them before when I tried to guide them so asking them to do it again would most likely require more hands on guidance than I'm capable of giving. tutterMouse (talk) 21:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- @TutterMouse: I believe Grangehilllover already submitted the draft through AfC and it was rejected as not being adequately sourced. I advise an Admin close this entry as
"Not done""Declined". --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- @TutterMouse: I believe Grangehilllover already submitted the draft through AfC and it was rejected as not being adequately sourced. I advise an Admin close this entry as
- @IJBall: Pinging Grangehilllover again about this, the steps to go through AFC confused them before when I tried to guide them so asking them to do it again would most likely require more hands on guidance than I'm capable of giving. tutterMouse (talk) 21:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, not needed at the moment.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – the subject has received significant negative attention in the press and social media this week. — Rebbing talk 02:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 09:59, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing vandalism issues. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:49, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 10:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – These IP addresses keep trying to remove spoilers. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 05:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 10:10, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Ongoing IP vandalism of the removal of a link. Binksternet has previously reverted the same editor on the same point with the summary "Long-term abuse on music articles, using multiple IPs", so this may be a larger problem with just this one article. – SchroCat (talk) 09:01, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 10:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: There's been odd cases of vandalism (example), as well as a high level of disruptive IP editing. Several other editors and I have discussed on the article's talk page what to call this event series, and a consensus was met that this would be referred to as a 'miniseries'. But for the past two days, IPs have been dropping in and changing the contents of the article so that it says 'season' without even considering the talk page discussion (example). Here's another very disruptive edit that shows the IP's unfamiliarity with Wikipedia's process.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 07:29, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 08:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Series of IPs dump fringe POV versions of the article in the talk page. Constantine ✍ 08:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., semi-protection is IMO sufficient.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by several IPs. ozhu (talk·contribs) 08:24, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:35, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This network company is a mere non-notable stuff and needs to be Salted. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 08:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent disruptive editing, addition of unsourced bogus/hoaxes, ignoring WP:BRD, massive unsuited changes to the lede (making it 2x longer), as well as ignoring the talk page both on the article, as well as on his own page.[73]-[74]. Clearly not here to have a fruitful discussion regarding his unsuited changes. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
User:LouisAragon clearly has a conflict of interest. They revert by claiming "Unsourced" contents such as "In 1982, there was an attempted military coup against Khomeini" which was sourced to highly reliable NYTimes (http://www.nytimes.com/1982/06/28/world/iran-says-an-attempted-coup-by-army-group-was-foiled.html) [75]. Also ignorned/ removed warning on their talkpage [76]--Dolly Cao (talk) 02:37, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - request was good at the time but the article has been quiet recently. Also, one of the parties said they'll stop reverting and discuss on the talk page. Re-list if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 21:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: This was semi protected by Gadfium because lots of SPA's were adding poorly sourced content. This has started again so will an admin please consider restoring semi protection. Note it has also been full protected due to edit warring. AIRcorn (talk) 21:05, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined Seems to have settled down for now. Katietalk 22:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Harassment against me from a persistent vandal who usually targets Millennials and Generation X, and who has recently vandalized the user page of User:Donner60. Binksternet (talk) 22:17, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Binksternet you or someone using your account apparently removed my comment on The Piper at the Gates of Dawn talk page three times -- please don't do that again. As you know, any editor can leave a comment on a talk page and you can't remove talk page comments from other editors --- ever. This is according to Wikipedia policy. Thank you. 2606:6000:610A:9000:9DF6:CC8D:592B:1AE (talk) 00:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Katietalk 22:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP-hopping LTA vandal targeting me. Binksternet (talk) 22:51, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- This isn't needed. I requested that you don't remove my comments from The Piper at the Gates of Dawn talk page (see above). That's a legitimate request to leave on YOUR talk page. The other item I left on your talk page was a warning to stop edit warring which you clearly did at The Piper at the Gates of Dawn talk page by removing my comments there three times. Thank you. 2606:6000:610A:9000:9DF6:CC8D:592B:1AE (talk) 00:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Katietalk 22:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Edit warring. Users reverting each other because of allegations of sockpuppetry '''tAD''' (talk) 19:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 22:08, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent death. SanAnMan (talk) 20:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, to be honest...I don't see more than one or two disruptive edits in here...maybe you can point out more examples, but I'm seeing decent work from IPs only (talk) 21:58, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User keeps vandalizing my talk page. Jdcomix (talk) 20:16, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined - request was good at the time but page has calmed down quite a bit. AlexiusHoratius 20:37, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Anonymous IP addresses are repeatedly using this page to advertise. See 71.48.54.13 in particular. Ninedotnine (talk) 04:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 20:10, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism persists after protection recently expired. Melonkelon (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending seemed to work decently last time; let's try it again instead of plain semi. only (talk) 00:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Triple J Hottest 100 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Triple J Hottest 100, 2015 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary Semi-protection: Article has been vandalised by a number of unregistered users throughout the day. Slabba (talk) 05:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Only: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Done One was already protected and expired. only (talk) 22:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Ottoman concubines
- Mahidevran Hatun (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Handan Sultan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Halime Sultan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Saliha Dilaşub Sultan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Hatice Muazzez Sultan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Mahfiruz Hatice Sultan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Since months these articles have been the targets of some unending disruptive editing by IPs, usually claiming unsourced ancestries frequently based on source falsification (changing the meaning of sourced content without changing or challenging the source).--Phso2 (talk) 18:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (For the first and last articles listed.)
Declined for the others as not really enough recent activity. AlexiusHoratius 19:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This seems to be a target for User:ArthurRebelnatico socks to get auto confirmed and be able to edit semi-protected pages related to Sophia Abrahão. Steel1943 (talk) 21:59, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 22:06, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 22:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Widr (talk) 20:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 22:06, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent disruption by IP dumping a fringe POV version of the article in the talk page. Constantine ✍ 21:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
28 January 2016
- Donetsk People's Republic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Luhansk People's Republic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Full protection: edit-warring. Ymblanter (talk) 14:11, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent IP vandalism in popular character article from new and even more popular Star Wars film. — TAnthonyTalk 15:57, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:07, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism recently. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's being edited too heavily for pending changes. Katietalk 20:49, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Unconfirmed trade reports. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 20:46, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:08, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Unconfirmed trade reports. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 20:46, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:09, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Shi Tianze (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Yuan dynasty (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Persistent removal of sourced content. JesseW900 (talk) 14:24, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (For both.) AlexiusHoratius 19:13, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of low quality and unreferenced content. Lighton Phiri 14:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:03, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by changing IPs. DVdm (talk) 15:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:07, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism, some of which has gotten press attention (National Sun Times, NBC Chicago). Note that this isn't the first time this has happened, so a longer duration may be necessary. FallingGravity (talk) 17:50, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:04, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent IP vandalism. IPs are vandalising with comments relating to William III of England and Billy King's loan move from Hearts to Rangers. Exxy (talk) 18:04, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:01, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Note, this is the TFA. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 18:30, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Barrage of abuse from IPs on this article's talk page. The article is already PC-protected, so preventing IPs from using talk will not inhibit improvements to the article. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 18:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:03, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-full-protection: Bringing this here from WP:ANI. Editors dispute some changes that BushelCandle and EEng have made to the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images guideline page about size and location, and there is currently a RfC going on about the size aspect of the guideline. See Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images#Fixing images below the default size and Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images#RfC: Should the guideline maintain the "As a general rule" wording or something similar?. Permalinks here and here. EEng is steadily making significant changes to the guideline without consensus, and I feel that the page needs full protection to cease this disruption to the guideline page until the RfC is over and/or until other matters are worked out on the guideline talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:16, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Query: Is "Temporary semi-protection" or "full protection to cease this disruption to the guideline page until the RfC is over and/or until other matters are worked out on the guideline talk page" being requested?
- If the latter, then this would seem excessive and smacks of filibustering when, overtly, only a small part of a subsection seems to be the subject of ongoing dispute and discussion. It also seems unnecessary when a conciliatory proposal has been made with regard to this small part of a subsection and remains unanswered at the time of writing this. BushelCandle (talk) 05:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- BushelCandle, I meant full protection. Semi-protection would not stop editors who are WP:Autoconfirmed, meaning those like you and me. And why the page needs full protection should be clear by this back and forth, and other contested changes going on at the guideline page, and this discussion going on at WP:ANI. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 09:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for that clarification that you wish to stop all editors updating and clarifying our Manual of Style section on images so that it conforms to our current policy on the topic. For exactly what period of time do you want to completely freeze the MoS page? 3 months, 6 months? Please simply accept that you have as much right to improve our advice as I do and use the usual methods of BRD ? BushelCandle (talk) 08:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- BushelCandle, I meant full protection. Semi-protection would not stop editors who are WP:Autoconfirmed, meaning those like you and me. And why the page needs full protection should be clear by this back and forth, and other contested changes going on at the guideline page, and this discussion going on at WP:ANI. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 09:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- I explained my issue; and, as noted, it's the same issue others have expressed about the recent changes being made to the guideline without discussion or consensus. You obviously disagree, but do not misrepresent my views as "stop[ping] all editors updating and clarifying our Manual of Style section on images so that it conforms to our current policy on the topic." I'm also not sure what "current policy" you are referring to, but the back and forth changes going on there now are based on editors' preferences and not on what has been proven to work well for years. And as for the length of temporary full protection, I already stated, "I feel that the page needs full protection to cease this disruption to the guideline page until the RfC is over and/or until other matters are worked out on the guideline talk page." It's up to an administrator to set the length. But either, way, it's clear that the page will not be full-protected at this point; so you and others are free to repeatedly change the guideline so that it's different from one day to the next, on an editor's whim, and is never stable. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 11:33, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:34, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:50, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment - with that thing about Rabano user, whoever he is, I feel it is more like "persistant disruptive editing". Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:37, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mlpearc (open channel) 04:10, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Full Page Protection (15-days): ...not sure why these experienced editors are editwaring ...but simply not good to have this ongoing for a week....lock the page until they work this out...having the MOS change many times a day is not helpfull for other talks that point to the MOS ...then find out it has change many times in the interim. -- Moxy (talk) 17:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:34, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Longer Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Previous 3 days protection was just expired, and IP returned at vandalising it. DVdm (talk) 15:24, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GABHello! 15:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:41, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Semi protected indefinitely back in 2009. Now that this person's public profile has diminished since then, the issues that caused the 2009 protection have very likely subsided. Arbor to SJ (talk) 06:26, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotected. If a need for protection recurs, please drop a note on my talk page. Deor (talk) 16:37, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 199.231.188.244 (talk) 09:13, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:17, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Handball at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's qualification (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Premature adding of teams. Kante4 (talk) 14:04, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:12, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mlpearc (open channel) 15:56, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:13, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – And it is this time of year, where the vandalism spikes at the point when Chinese New Year is coming. Possibly two or three weeks for my opinion. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:43, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unsourced edits to this BLP. Qed237 (talk) 13:18, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:57, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Apparently this topic has come to the attention of 4chan. Several vandal edits got it semiprotected for 24 hours, but there's been one instance of vandalism already since that protection expired. A. Parrot (talk) 07:10, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:56, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism because of his height. Kante4 (talk) 09:30, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:55, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 11:18, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the past month or so, but as of recent the past few days have seen a lot of it in a heavier dose. Gloss 21:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - 112.198.77.155 (talk) 04:09, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 05:18, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – persistent reverting/edit warring. Boomer VialHolla 10:05, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:18, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:50, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. two weeks by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 05:25, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 02:02, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 05:25, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. DaltonCastle (talk) 04:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 05:22, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of non-notable infant child's name by multiple IPs. General Ization Talk 05:01, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 05:23, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Talk:Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Recently indef'ed user showing up to troll and harass on this talk page with different IPs. I'd also appreciate if someone semi'd my talk page as well. Volunteer Marek (talk) 23:08, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. only (talk) 23:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Yopie (talk) 03:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 05:17, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 03:38, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 05:18, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: ResellerRatings factual content is consistently removed by an individual associated with the company, then protection requests are filed to prevent that information from appearing in the article. Any factual, well sourced, encyclopedic content added by any user which casts any type of unfavorable light on this business is consistently removed, then protection requests are filed to keep the information out of the article for 6 months. The same user, Techimo, who likely has an affiliation with the organization as the only other article he's ever contributed is the one he started about the company's founder (Scott Wainner), is responsible for this manipulation.
The latest revisions were quite neutral, well sourced from peer review sites such as the Better Business Bureau, SiteJabber, and Truspilot, as well as industry news magazine, Internet Retailer Magazine, a former division of Thomson Reuters. These are neutral sources with no axe to grind. Criticisms were listed as well as the steps ResellerRatings took to address them. That is about as neutral as it gets. All of ResellerRatings' peers such as TrustPilot, Angie's List, and the Better Business Bureau have similar "Criticism" sections. Why is ResellerRatings' article allowed to be any different?
The consistent citing of "non neutral point of view" by user Techimo and his various IP's is false, disruptive, and misleading. I request that protection be removed, the article be reverted to the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ResellerRatings&oldid=701384529 revision, and for the protection to be added back for a 6 month period, to prevent Techimo from removing factual content and abusing Wikipedia protection. ZeroShadows (talk) 20:57, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Counter Argument to Unprotection: ZeroShadows is defending content contributed to the ResellerRatings page by 71.235.154.73, an edit warring IP who posted the same (or versions of) critical attacks (citing every negative, and not reliable, hearsay, blog, and user generated forum posting source he could locate) no less than 103 times in December 2014 in an eager effort to attack the ResellerRatings page with a non-NPOV agenda, which also included sources which were not reliable. This user then began another tirade of posts under the the username NotTechimo, for which he was blocked from Wikipedia for impersonating (me) by Mr._Stradivarius. The edit war continued from 32.211.179.232, so the ResellerRatings page was protected for 6 months until August 2015 by CambridgeBayWeather.
Now, after a new round of critical, non-NPOV, and biased edits to the ResellerRatings page by the same edit warring IP 71.235.154.73 which began on January 21, 2016, within hours, ZeroShadows also contributed several edits to the ResellerRatings and Better Business Bureau pages, and he is now here asking you to allow his (or his friend's) biased agenda and attack against this page to be allowed to persist. There is documentation on the web that exists proving that 71.235.154.73 has a continuing financial interest in damaging the ResellerRatings page and an axe to grind, but in the interest of upholding Wikipedia's outing policy, that won't be posted here. However, ignoring that, and on the sole basis that 71.235.154.73 engaged in a 100+ edit warring attack, impersonated me by creating the NotTechimo account, and got blocked by two admins, I would respectfully request that you deny this user the ability to continue his pattern of abuse. Techimo (talk) 08:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Response: You've made my point in your response, citing the same "non-NPOV" argument you make for every single edit to the article made by anyone, but yourself. The history of the article speaks for itself as you've been at this since the inception of the article (which you started). Calling the Better Business Bureau, Angie's List, Trustpilot, Sitejabber, and Thomson Reuters "negative, and not reliable, hearsay, blog, and user generated forum posting source(s)" is laughable. You obviously have a vested interest in ResellerRatings, are not an impartial user, and most definitely have a conflict of interest. These sources are impartial and have no axe to grind. The data that was included, regardless of who included it, was neutral, encyclopedic, and in the spirit of Wikipedia. Your manipulation of the protection system and prevention of factual information from appearing in the article needs to end. ZeroShadows (talk) 09:18, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Multiple reverts. 170.248.189.79 (talk) 07:08, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, sorry for not reacting on time.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. MusaTalk ☻ 18:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 19:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 18:59, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined - just one user recently - warn and report to WP:AIV if it's vandalism, otherwise pursue dispute resolution. AlexiusHoratius 19:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This file's has been repeatedly vandalized by ips and new accounts. For the past 6 months every second edit is a revert due to vandalism. It has been protected in the past and it has continued since that protection has expired there seems to be no reason to leave this file semi protected indefinitely. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 19:46, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:34, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Done only (talk) 23:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection until February 18: Lots of vandalism done and unsourced content added by IPs over the past week. Lots of information about the album has been revealed and changed, so with hectic editing already, I suggest protecting this article until 1 week after the album's release date (February 11). Aria1561 (talk) 20:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 22:15, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 23:08, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Melonkelon (talk) 22:56, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Liz Read! Talk! 23:01, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: People are constantly editing this article back and forth between two versions. The version described here is the correct one that should be kept: Keep both A.J. Styles AND AJ Styles as ring names + keep the infobox picture as Styles arm raised on Raw. Both ring names are correct and he uses both, he always has. The infoxbox picture that people keep putting on is the one where Styles is at an indy show in 2014, which is quite outdated, the one that was taken on the 25th of January this year with Styles getting his arm raised should be kept. It would be best to get the page semi-protected with the version I have described here ASAP.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 23:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 23:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Floquenbeam (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Many unregistered and newly created users are continually vandalizing the article. They are most likely all sent by TheGamersJoint on Youtube, who is also Imcynical here on Wikipedia, whom started the vandalism attack. -SaveTheseGames (talk) 20:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Smalljim. Katietalk 22:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:02, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Rather it be Temporary protection, registered users are vandalizing it as well as IPs. -SaveTheseGames (talk) 21:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's have been coming in off message boards to remove big chunks of the page. Few times recently, a few times in the past month. Not getting solved by the constant reverting. Gloss 21:23, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:08, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
29 January 2016
- Han dynasty (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Shang dynasty (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. JesseW900 (talk) 23:49, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected, one for 10 days, another one for 3 days--Ymblanter (talk) 20:16, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Qing dynasty (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Tang dynasty (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. JesseW900 (talk) 23:49, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected, one day and one week, respectively--Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Edwardx (talk) 19:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same as before, disruption from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 22:02, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – slow running edit war over the last week or so. Gaijin42 (talk) 22:28, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism on a daily basis which requires consistant reverting. Question - how does a page achieve indefinite protection? I am in desperate need of this. SatDis (talk) 00:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined I see good faith edits. Yeah, somebody doing overtime on copyediting logged out with no edit summaries and swapping IPs all the time (effectively giving you no way of explaning why they're doing something) can be annoying, but that's not against the rules. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 19:41, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- The Penguins of Madagascar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of The Penguins of Madagascar episodes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IPv6 adding unreferenced info. Edit warring this and communication outside of edit summaries won't be seen by this dyanmic IP. Similar issues on other pages, a block of 2602:30A:2E5E:CBA0::/64 would be a effective way to stop this. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:46, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., for both articles--Ymblanter (talk) 19:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User's page is being vandalized by a number of socks from a already blocked account. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Dance Moms (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Dance Moms (season 1) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Dance Moms (season 2) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Dance Moms (season 3) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Dance Moms (season 4) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Dance Moms (season 5) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Dance Moms (season 6) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP hopping vandal who is removing links, rearranging content, deliberately misspelling words after they've been corrected, etc.[77][78][79] Seems to have something against Maddie Ziegler as that is the link he keeps removing. The same editor is making similar edits at Dance Moms (season 1), Dance Moms (season 2), Dance Moms (season 3), Dance Moms (season 4), Dance Moms (season 5) and Dance Moms (season 6),[80][81][82][83][84][85] so these all need protecting. AussieLegend (✉) 15:45, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:33, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multi-ip vandalism. Charles (talk) 18:29, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:35, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from bouncing IP addresses, same edit to change the place of birth without citation (despite current place of birth having citation), attempts to discuss on talk page. Jooojay (talk) 18:30, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:37, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A recently blocked user has created multiple socks to repost rather inflammatory and highly NPOV on the talkpage. User has been instructed not to do so on numerous occasions. . RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:41, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP edits that inaccurately report/contradict references.--Jersey92 (talk) 01:33, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 17:15, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated changes to country of birth while RfC on the issue proceeds on the talk page. : Noyster (talk), 12:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Over a week of roughly daily IP edits, changing her infobox "occupation = best of wives and best of women", and her sister's full and liked name to merely "Peggy". Not the worst vandalism ever, but annoying. Hopefully after a week or two the IPs will go away. --GRuban (talk) 15:23, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There needs to be a longer duration of semi-protection, as it's clear that this is a target page. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 15:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:43, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continual and repeated additions of non-notable people by a variety of IP addresses [86][87][88],[89][90][91][92][93],[94][95][96] etc. This generally involves the inclusion of several YouTubers allegedly from Guernsey. I notice there is a suggestion on the Talk page as far back as 2008 suggesting page protection. Sionk (talk) 00:14, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There aren't that many edits, so putting the page on pending changes won't be too onerous, but will stop the disruption. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – various IP activity. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 11:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:30, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:57, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:03, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., I only see two vandal edits made by the same IP who stopped after warnings.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:45, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been subject to persistent vandalism; a good majority of the edits made to this article have been found to be unconstructive and have been subsequently reverted[97][98][99][100][101][102][103]. Boomer VialHolla 06:33, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 10:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – 3rr-rule violation by different IPs (49.197.34.181, 101.183.74.224, 49.197.157.52, 49.197.157.52) from Australia despite validated error. . ZH8000 (talk) 11:41, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 12:58, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator GiantSnowman. Katietalk 14:48, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – various IP activity. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 13:12, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:48, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same as before, disruption from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 22:02, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, BLP violations, block evasion. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:58, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protected for six weeks to prevent the racist edits made by the IP shifting anon from New Jersey and now Ontario, Canada. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: There are incessant edits to the list of countries, whether it should include Israel, Palestine, Palestinian territories. Many IP editors do drive by edits, which is restricted under WP:ARBPIA. Debresser (talk) 07:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
24hr semi-protection: Edit warring, unexplained blanking by IPv6 IP. 96.237.18.103 (talk) 00:59, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Katietalk 03:37, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: There appears to be lots of vandalism, some unsourced edits, and some good edits. I think pending changes may be worth it for this article. Plus, this is a big target because of US and the fact that that this is a big thing in the US (plus, the Donald Trump thing). Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 02:38, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined Edit rate is too high for pending changes. Katietalk 03:17, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 07:12, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Probable socks of blocked user ErerfAnocaj adds the same poorly sourced info. Sjö (talk) 07:23, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Fountain Posters (talk) 10:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:44, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New user vandalism. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:03, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Materialscientist. Katietalk 03:36, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Long term Semi-protection: Remember this from January 10? Same as before. Persistent and uncited "boyfriend" language many times a day. SlightSmile 01:59, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 03:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you--I didn't mean to boldface my last edit summary there. One likes to save shouting for emergencies. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection Persistent vandalism by IPs in the same range. Addition of unreferenced or falsely sourced tour dates and venues for Nicki Minaj. A broader net may be necessary, as these accounts edit peripheral articles, adding bogus content to purported venues. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:42, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 03:30, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP-hopping editor has been regularly changing plurality to single winner accross several articles and this template without discussion. Happy Squirrel (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A considerable amount of false and/or nonsensical edits regarding the page's Counter-Strike and League of Legends sections throughout January, recent influx today. ItsIzumi (talk) 01:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 03:35, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An ip editor with a COI (evading a one-month block placed on another account - 180.1.96.168) continues to repeatedly remove reliably sourced text from the article despite being urged to discuss specific issues on the Talk page. . DAJF (talk) 03:14, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 03:29, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 03:16, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 03:25, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant edit warring/vandalism by an IP which refuses to accept facts. Denniss (talk) 12:11, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I will consider a full-protect if you and the anonymous editor feel it's appropriate, but this is a content dispute between autoconfirmed editors and anonymous editor(s) as it stands, so I don't think it's appropriate to use semi-protection. Deryck C. 22:14, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent IP vandalism. IPs are getting rid of dates at are part of the tour.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Deryck C. 22:10, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – It seems now that almost all edits from IP are vandalism or addition of unsourced content. Suggest protection for no less than a week. MB298 (talk) 01:08, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Graeme Bartlett. Katietalk 03:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks edit-warring. I don't think PC is working. . Dr. K. 02:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:05, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Acroterion. Katietalk 03:17, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. G37x8004uc (talk) 06:39, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 20:56, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. tamil 14:43, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 20:51, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: I created this page and, as an avid viewer of the subject, know all there is to know about it. I'd like there to be no falsified edits. With full protection, it will be prevented. KC M. 19:34, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:43, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for three months. Acalamari 00:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:37, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:03, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – 178.221.229.218 (talk · contribs) is evading block of 178.223.194.146 (talk · contribs). SLBedit (talk) 21:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:47, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. one month by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 00:03, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:47, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:05, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Edit warring over nonsense, persistent accusations of racism against other editors, involving multiple IPs from the same range. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 23:43, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Full Page Protection (5-days): Persistent disruptive editing, third time, on Bach article and Talk page by User:Francis Schonken. A new RfC is currently open at Johann Sebastian Bach with 4-5 editors in support of changes with citations added to the proposed text in the previous RfC, and two editors Opposed User:Martindale and User:Francis Schonken. One of the editors, User:Francis has returned to edit warring on the Talk page despite warning from User:Softlavender to follow RfC policy and guideline. In addition, two previous Full page protection from User:Ymblanter and User:MusikA previously issued for User:Francis to stop edit warring and to encourage him to participate in the open RfC have been ignored. Instead, User:Francis is now disruptively editing the RfC in order to deflect any new editors from participating. Virtually all new editors have been deflected over the week-end from participation due to the disruptive editing by User:Francis. I have returned the RfC to normal format and requested that editor comments be placed in the Comment Section of the RfC following the Support-Oppose section but User:Francis ignores this and reverts it. User:Francis is apparently now pretending to be the originator and author of the RfC by edit warring.
Request here is made for temporary Full Page Protection for the article for 5-days and a cautionary warning to User:Francis to follow RfC guidelines and policies since a preliminary warning was already made by User:Softlaverder to User:Francis concerning this matter. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 18:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:51, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - request has been here a few days now and although there were some recent reverts of anon edits the content dispute that prompted this request seems to have died down. Re-list if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 19:18, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: wiki is a international org. due to national border problem somecan destroy the article . tamil 14:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined already semiprotected - sufficient in this case. AlexiusHoratius 19:09, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection. tamil 14:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined - article talk pages are generally only protected in extreme cases. AlexiusHoratius 19:11, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent reinsertion of unrelated trivia. Drmies (talk) 21:05, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for 1 day. Deryck C. 22:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: In the past few days, repeated edits from IPs and users who don't have enough edits to be autoconfirmed repeatedly vandalizing the article related to the Barcelona-Real Madrid soccer rivalry. Egsan Bacon (talk) 22:08, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 22:25, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 22:23, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: – Daily IP vandalism, all month long. PP needs to be increased. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 22:16, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for 1 year on top of indefinite PC. Deryck C. 22:22, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is a frequent target of blanking and vandalism. Boomer VialHolla 05:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected until 2 Feb 00:00. This is borderline - I'd normally decline as NEA with the same mixture and frequency of edits, but seeing that this is an ongoing event, it might be worth semi-protecting until the event's over. Deryck C. 22:12, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Subject of almost daily unsourced additions re boyfriends and DOB to BLP. Has been protected before but same behaviour reoccurring. Egghead06 (talk) 12:35, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 22:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Philip J Fry / talk 14:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not sure what's the most appropriate length of protection - come back for an extension if unhelpful anon edits reappear. Deryck C. 22:18, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
30 January 2016
Indefinite Semi-protection: To promote compliance with the policy on biographies of living people. 160.44.230.210 (talk) 11:49, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, there were no edits since the expiration of the previous protection--Ymblanter (talk) 12:58, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuously changing sales figure which contradicts reference provided. — AYTK talk. 13:38, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page was semi-protected because IP editors were adding hoax information, and it has restarted now that the semi-protection expired. An IP editor on a dynamic IP address is repeatedly re-adding the same hoax casting information that misrepresents sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:42, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for 3 months by Lectonar. tutterMouse (talk) 16:49, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – All edits to this page this year have been sockpuppetry or reversions thereof. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:47, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:05, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – All edits to this page this year have been sockpuppetry or reversions thereof. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:07, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 112.198.83.150 (talk) 03:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 10:05, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 05:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:35, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Edit warring / content dispute. – Three editors (Bueller 007 (talk · contribs), NewsAndEventsGuy (talk · contribs) and Parsley Man (talk · contribs)) are fighting each other over a deceased person named Robert LaVoy Finicum. --45.26.44.116 (talk) 06:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Unnecessary. There is no edit war happening. Bueller 007 (talk) 07:08, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Unnecessary, at least at present. It's true that concurrent editing of current events often looks like edit warring, but so far most editors are responsive to discussions. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 08:57, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined If this escalates, relist it. Katietalk 10:05, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Edit wars with unregistered IPs about her world ranking, which is not updated as of yet. Stewwie (talk) 11:35, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:35, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – With their (I'm assuming) pretty unpopular video about copyrighting the react concept, IPs have been attacking the page lately. Zappa24Mati 02:53, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:51, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Recent additions of unsourced content claiming that NBCUniversal will be purchasing WRAZ and turning it into a Telemundo affiliate, per: [104] [105] This is likely the same sockpuppet master who made similar recent claims on the articles NBCUniversal, Capitol Broadcasting Company and WRAL-TV about NBCU "buying the CBC in fall 2017". Creativity-II (talk) 07:20, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article has been vandalized once, and really, only edited 5 times in the past 4 months. This is not a pattern of behavior requiring protection. Revert and move on. Jayron32 07:29, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has a long history of vandalism and needs indefinite semi-protection. Dee03 10:14, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:45, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Driveby pre-emptive indef. semi-protection years ago (7) by an admin who's long since quit the site. Please unprotect. (No objection to move=sysop being kept.) –87.115.76.251 (talk) 00:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment - Happy-melon is now semi-active; he has not quitted just yet. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 02:40, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Happy-melon (basically inactive, two edits in as many years) didn't protect that page. The protecting admin was User:GoneAwayNowAndRetired. See the log. –87.115.76.251 (talk) 03:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 20:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry for getting the things wrong. However, I would agree unprotection anyway, as I agree on the fact about pre-emptive protection. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 20:58, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Quite alright, Qwertyxp2000, easily to overlook the entry—had to click through four links to reach the right log myself! Thank you for the second opinion, too; much appreciated. –87.115.76.251 (talk) 22:26, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry for getting the things wrong. However, I would agree unprotection anyway, as I agree on the fact about pre-emptive protection. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 20:58, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 20:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Happy-melon (basically inactive, two edits in as many years) didn't protect that page. The protecting admin was User:GoneAwayNowAndRetired. See the log. –87.115.76.251 (talk) 03:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Unprotected Ymblanter (talk) 13:00, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ymblanter: One or more pages in this request have not been unprotected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GABHello! 02:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:09, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent BLP vandalism by multiple IPs, likely same person. Jim1138 (talk) 02:20, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 10:07, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, harassment. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 06:47, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 10:00, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; trolling. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 06:50, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 10:02, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Mlpearc (open channel) 23:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:09, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ymblanter: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced edits claiming subject's death. Thus far no mention from reliable sources, so far as I can tell. The only reference I find is from a website called Lipstick alley, where it's a brief conversational thread. If anyone can secure a better source, it would be helpful. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:06, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:38, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 01:20, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:40, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Human3015 TALK 20:30, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., needs to be semi-protected indefinitely after the current protection expires.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:01, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – requested yesterday and user was blocked, but has popped up somewhere else. Protecting the page would be appreciated. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 04:08, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- On second thought – should consider a whole-area block or something, as this IP has gone onto my user page. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 04:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:14, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Protected by Ymblanter 10 minutes ago. Dat GuyTalkContribs 09:01, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:04, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users continuously adding false information and adding unnecessary sub sections. It will be good to protect it until 24 feb (last day of Pakistan Super League in which team will compete). Anjana LarkaSEND WIKILOVE💗 08:43, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:05, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PLease see [106]. A user over the last two years, uing various IPs and occasionally creating a WP:SPA, has ben trying to add 'John Galea' to the notable residents section - his article was deleted at AfD in 2013. This is the most persistent sock/promoter I've ever come across and I don't know how best to protect this article. Boleyn (talk) 08:44, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., looks to me like pending changes are more appropriate--Ymblanter (talk) 08:56, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Not sockpuppetry, but IP jumping. 2a02:1205:c68b:12e0:81af:b508:d46:ac93 now turned to 2a02:1205:c68b:12e0:f915:994b:62e8:94c0. Dat GuyTalkContribs 09:04, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:07, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 07:30, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, sorry for not reacting earlier--Ymblanter (talk) 20:23, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A decent spurt of vandalism in the last hour. MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:04, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock accounts adding unsourced and possible BLP material to page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:26, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Significant vandalism by IPs over the last few days. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 22:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:33, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Dynamic IP repeatedly targeting article with massive POV violations, pasting in already existing text in additional places, and falsifying sources. Jeppiz (talk) 23:16, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, the material has also been inserted by an autoconfirmed user. I can, in principle, fully protect the article, but it seems to me that at this point full protection could be excessive.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:59, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:01, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:02, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:05, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. tamil 14:16, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 17:35, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant edits against MOS. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Full so as not to take the reporter's side in an apparent good-faith edit dispute by an IP editor actively engaged in talkpage discussion. User:Mlpearc is reminded to WP:AGF. DMacks (talk) 22:42, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 22:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High traffic article, lots of vandalism. Eteethan(talk) 23:17, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 23:38, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
31 January 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Not sure what the hell is going on here, but these people need to discuss. Requesting full as some accounts being used to perform these edits are autoconfirmed. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 09:10, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. clpo13(talk) 20:23, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:33, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 20:43, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:22, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Boomer VialHolla 23:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:23, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs won't quit adding rumours. SLBedit (talk) 23:40, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Many IPs making many unconstructive edits over a long period of time. —DangerousJXD (talk) 03:30, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Requesting a short-term full protection due to an ongoing edit war. -- Kendrick7talk 04:49, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- I've reverted the addition per WP:BLPADMINS and WP:BLPREMOVE as it is controversial and poorly sourced (and some it looks like synthesis). Hopefully page protection won't be necessary. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Callanecc:. The edit warring has continued with them now IP hopping. Given the previous protection on the article, a long period of semi-protection might help to ensure that people stick to one account. SmartSE (talk) 14:58, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 19:30, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/disruptive edits. Give Your a Break 12:03, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and unsourced edits from anonymous IPs. Its like occuring atleast twice a week. The article is already a well sourced one and all edits are reviewd by admins. So why can't it be made official. Charles Turing (talk) 19:06, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent on-going disruptive editing, following Haenow's split from Syco Music. livelikemusic talk! 16:20, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, sorry for not reacting earlier--Ymblanter (talk) 14:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unnecessary edits. Test. Lukaslt13 --Talk 14:06, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, pending changes seem to be working fine.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:26, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/disruptive edits. Give Your a Break 12:03, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, pending changes seems to be working okay only (talk) 12:52, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – transfer rumours. Qed237 (talk) 13:51, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, unsourced and nuisance edits. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Much like at the recently protected "21 Guns", there's been persistent additions of fake and unverified charts by IPs and new users here too. It has been a recurring problem, and has only gotten worse for the past week. Kokoro20 (talk) 13:57, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:04, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 14:32, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, other than your edits today, it hasn't been edited since August of last year. only (talk) 02:51, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Don't know whether this controversy is true or false. But people are constantly reverting and re-adding this info. Special:Contributions/LeoTate This SPA is making most of the removal. Variation 25.2 (talk) 15:59, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined, I am afraid this needs to go via dispute resolution avenues, the edit-warring is going on for a long time, and the reverted text has two reliable sources.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:06, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 18:50, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Winterysteppe (talk) 22:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 22:16, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection or pending changes: page is fully protected, but both having no protection and full protection are too extreme. I suggest pending changes. 96.237.18.103 (talk) 22:12, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @96.237.18.103: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:19, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- The page has been unprotected by Nyttend, so I've moved this request from requests for reduction to increase. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us see how it works with this article--Ymblanter (talk) 09:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- The page has been unprotected by Nyttend, so I've moved this request from requests for reduction to increase. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mlpearc (open channel) 00:32, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is short so I can discuss with the IP. I will make it longer if he does not agree to stop. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Artem-S-Tashkinov (talk) 01:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 02:49, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Could we have a bit of protection for this popular-with-vandals page, please? Thanks. DBaK (talk) 02:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:18, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism that also appears to be the work of a sockpuppet operating with many different IP's. ElementBroccoli (talk) 02:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. (semi protection for one year). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Constant BLP issues and general disruptive editing. MB298 (talk) 03:51, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection or block IPv6 2605:e000:2340:400:*:*:*:* who has been changing Uzbekistan to USSR in article for past several days without engaging on talk page. Glrx (talk) 05:23, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: For the last several weeks, various IPs have been making nearly identical unsourced edits to the infobox. – Robin Hood (talk) 06:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:57, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:CombatMarshmallow, using IPs from New Jersey. Binksternet (talk) 07:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:54, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For a long duration please, too much of IP cruft, vandals and new user joke edits going on. —IB [ Poke ] 09:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- ^ http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=66586220.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help)