Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 August 22

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TCS ASsociates logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This company logo is easily traceable to the company's website. On initial inspection, I am doubtful that it is exclusively the uploader's own work, as claimed on the file description page. SuperMarioMan 07:02, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep per Magog's investigation. Dianna (talk) 23:57, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hernan Garcia De Gonzalo with Frank Pace.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Going by the text of the Hernan Garcia de Gonzalo article, this photograph would seem to date from the 1970s (in which case, the 2012 publication date is misleading). If the uploader is indeed the copyright holder, this is something that (in my opinion) requires further evidence. SuperMarioMan 07:50, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - the uploader has uploaded other files of the subject (e.g., File:Hernan Garcia de Gonzalo Vidal.jpg) and is clearly in close connection with him. What's more, the uploader has the username Simongdg, which appears to make him the subject's son (he has a son named Simon, and gdg are his initials). While Hernan may not have taken the photograph described here, the fact is it was taken 35 years ago, and the only person who can reliably even testify as to who might be the author and who might be OK with the copyright is in fact probably Hernan; and seeing as we've established a family member of his called it free, I think this is good enough for me. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 06:49, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Software is available under the Mozilla Public License. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 06:19, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Firefox Multiple mines.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work - is it possible to count original as so simple that not copyrighted? Bulwersator (talk) 08:46, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sanders CHC Bust.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No freedom of panorama for statues in the source country Bulwersator (talk) 08:53, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept - credible assertion of authorship and credible explanation for third party usage. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 06:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue of kempegowda 1609.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo also here. Can't tell when it was taken. Stefan2 (talk) 10:42, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This was work done for some other website , unable to access it now as i guess it has been copied without concent the external link is done by a students at a university in USA far from Bangalore where the picture was taken. the picture was taken earlier but was reedited on the said date with text addition Shrikanthv (talk) 12:25, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:COM:CB#Internet images. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:10, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not a copy from any an internet source illegally. Shrikanthv (talk) 05:36, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept - credible assertion of authorship and credible explanation for third party usage. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 06:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Janaseva vidya kendra.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Strange watermark which could suggest copyvio. Also some strange light effect in the bottom left corner which could suggest that it has been scanned from a book. Stefan2 (talk) 10:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

water mark created previously for other publication (water mark being actual logo of the institute) and definitly not a scan of a book , I do not understand the white effect at the left bottom corner either , it was only previously edited for image sharpening and logo addition Shrikanthv (talk) 12:14, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:COM:CB#Internet images. The section applies equally well to paper publications. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:11, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eventhough it was first given for publication, I believe the author has still the rights of his picture as no agreement or documents were signed to give away copyrights to the publisher (Publisher being the institute itself) .Shrikanthv (talk) 05:39, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Dianna (talk) 00:25, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:LydiaPinkham-VegetableCompound.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source does not confirm PD-old status Bulwersator (talk) 11:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• The author died 125 years ago. The chances that it isn't public domain are extraordinarily low. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 06:23, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hamblen-Stuart.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• described as "Undated promotional photo of Hamblen" in Stuart Hamblen and "I, the copyright holder of this work" in File:Hamblen-Stuart.gif Bulwersator (talk) 11:32, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - promotional photos almost never carried a copyright, especially at the time this was taken (certainly before 1989), and the uploader probably just added him/herself as a copyright holder not understanding that Wikimedia doesn't honor copyrights for slavish scans of images. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 06:25, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's no source provided, so I am deleting on that basis. -- Dianna (talk) 00:04, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Opening of Good Will Hunting.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Mariah Carey at Fresh Air Fund Benefit Concert.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See User talk:Stefan2#HI. Stefan2 (talk) 13:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

these 2 photos are taken from a free website about Mariah carey from her lifetime events !!! www.mariahjournal.com/photogallery, without any specified authors or copyright holders ! From my behalf I'm sure that its FREE OF USE FOR ALL ! please NEVER DELETE those photos :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fidelove (talk • contribs) 13:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:COM:CB#Internet images. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:36, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• The first is a work of a professional photographer/photo agency and the second is an AP photo. I've tagged both as unambiguous copyright violations. Mosmof (talk) 01:59, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:08, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Judge J Frederic Voros Jr.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Judge J Frederic Voros Jr.jpg (ineligible for fair use per WP:NFCC#1) Magog the Ogre (talk•edits) 15:35, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Clearly non-free, and it's a living person. Sven Manguard Wha? 15:00, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:LogoofVu TelePresence.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused, and from Pinterest which implies that the image is not the uploader's copyright. Source is a 404 link, too. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 15:53, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Devita saraf.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The user who states "this image was taken by me" has a track record of unusual use of the truth. Their talk page is relevant here. I doubt very much that this file was taken by the user. The original stated source shows error 404, too, but appears to have been Pinterest, usually not a freely licenced source. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 15:55, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Devita-Saraf-.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The description of this file shows that the image "was emailed to {the uploader}by Devita Saraf". There is no suggestion that any right to upload the file has been granted Fiddle Faddle (talk) 15:58, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Devita Saraf, executive director, Zenith Computers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The user who states "this image was clicked by me in Delhi" has a track record of unusual use of the truth. Their talk page is relevant here. I doubt very much that this file was taken by the user. The Facebook page logged as a previosly published place is unavailable Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:00, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mr Raj Saraf, CMD, Zenith Computers Ltd, with Ms Devita Saraf, Director.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The user who uploaded this file has a track record of unusual use of the truth. Their talk page is relevant here. I doubt very much that this file created by the user. I doubt that the user is the copyright owner. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:02, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ms.Devita Saraf CEO, Vu Technologies with Mr. Hitendra (Danny) Chaturvedi. Sr.Director OEM,Microsoft.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The user who uploaded this file has a track record of unusual use of the truth. Their talk page is relevant here. I doubt very much that this file created by the user. I doubt that the user is the copyright owner. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:03, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DevitaSaraf.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The user who uploaded this file has a track record of unusual use of the truth. Their talk page is relevant here. I doubt very much that this file created by the user. I doubt that the user is the copyright owner. There is no licencing statement at the given URL. This file is almost certainly anther person's copyright Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:04, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sudhirji123.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The user who uploaded this file has a track record of unusual use of the truth. Their talk page is relevant here. I doubt very much that this file created by the user. I doubt that the user is the copyright owner. There is no licencing statement at the given URL. This file is almost certainly another person's copyright. There is a comment "this file is for Wikipedia" but that cannot, surely, constitute a full release into the wild. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:05, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep - ineligible for copyright protection. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 06:43, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shri Sudhir mungantiwarsig.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The user who uploaded this file has a track record of unusual use of the truth. Their talk page is relevant here. I doubt very much that this file created by the user. I doubt that the user is the copyright owner. This file is almost certainly anther person's copyright Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:08, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:08, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:African Shackfin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Can also be found at [ http://www.conormccreedy.com/index.php/home/screen-shot-2012-04-11-at-9-28-30-am-3]; uploader has provided no proof of permission. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 18:38, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:08, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:African Shack Night.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:"African Shack".jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 18:40, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:08, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:African Shack Day.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:"African Shackdayfinal".jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 18:40, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centenario23.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

|Description=Buenos Aires in 1910 |Source=I created this image entirely by myself. |Date=17-05-2008

Seriously? Bulwersator (talk) 19:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: fair use Magog the Ogre (t • c) 06:28, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SAAF Rank L Cpl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The bird at the top looks complex. I don't agree that this is ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 19:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: fair use Magog the Ogre (t • c) 06:29, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SAAF Rank Cpl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The bird at the top looks complex. I don't agree that this is ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 19:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: fair use Magog the Ogre (t • c) 06:29, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SAAF Rank Sgt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The bird at the top looks complex. I don't agree that this is ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 19:46, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: fair use Magog the Ogre (t • c) 06:26, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SAAF Rank F Sgt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The bird at the top and the thing below look complex. I don't agree that this is ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 19:46, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:First west coast logo.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No source is listed. I cannot find any evidence of First releasing this logo and is probably fictional and created assuming they will use a similar style as the rest of their trains. However, they have stated they may not even use this name. The image should be removed because it uses the First group logo in an adaptation and is therefore a copyright infringement. Oddbodz (talk) 21:20, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm not sure the logo is complex enough to be copyrightable. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:02, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.