Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 February 1
< January 31 | February 2 > |
---|
February 1
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:09, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Image has the logo of the band embedded in it, which is non-free. Quibik (talk) 00:36, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:40, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rihanna2010.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image unlikely to be available as it appears to be made by pro photogs at Grammy event (cf. shot credited to John Shearer / WireImage.com at Grammy.com) and is apparently exact copy, cropped, of that posted at Rihanna fan site without credit, where TOS include "Please do not take pictures from here since they are for previewing purposes only!" — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 04:06, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Leonard^Bloom (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:46, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- [1] says "photo: AP/Ben Curtis" dave pape (talk) 16:35, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:08, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ethanol.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Judging by watermark, likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright owner. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:14, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I come to the same conclusion as Fastily. - Jarry1250 [Humorous? Discuss.] 18:20, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:08, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Picturecrop rws.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright owner. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:15, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The description on the page Brian Ickler describes him saying him after winning a race, yet in his records, he hasn't won one. Just an interesting point. Quiggers1P (talk) 21:13, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the other image on the page is clearly copyrighted with a watermark from the source website yet it is claimed as PD. This image appears to have the same problem. I'll speedy delete the other image as an obvious copyright infringement per WP:CSD#F9. I need to explain image copyrights to the uploader. Royalbroil 05:55, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:37, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MayersonPortrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Promotional photo of an individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright owner. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- http://www.mayerson.com/html/about.html But I'd wait for the OTRS email the user says he's sent. Shubinator (talk) 23:27, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.