Search results

Results 1 – 20 of 6,016
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

There is a page named "Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/FAQ" on Wikipedia

View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  • These are some Frequently Asked Questions about Wikipedia's Neutral point of view policy. Shortcut WP:NOOBJECTIVITY Everybody with any philosophical sophistication...
    20 KB (2,920 words) - 10:14, 17 January 2025
  • All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far...
    40 KB (4,858 words) - 06:16, 17 January 2025
  • minority; to do so would give undue weight to it." Also see Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/FAQ#Writing_for_the_opponent as it talks more about this. @Blueboar...
    132 KB (18,993 words) - 01:10, 19 January 2025
  • avoid NPOV examples NPOV FAQ Simple formulation NPOV dispute NPOV Noticeboard Point of view forks Characterizing opinions of people's work Naming conventions...
    4 KB (560 words) - 11:50, 3 July 2023
  • expression "neutral point of view" is misleading because the "Neutral" in NPOV refers to an editorial attitude and mindset; it is not a true "point of view". It...
    52 KB (6,570 words) - 20:07, 25 October 2024
  • of view (POVs) – cognitive perspectives – are often essential to articles which treat controversial subjects. Wikipedia's official "Neutral Point of View"...
    14 KB (2,051 words) - 15:16, 28 May 2024
  •  Help FAQs Article subjects Article subjects' FAQ Frequently asked questions (FAQs) Index of FAQs Main FAQ Overview Readers Schools Contributing Editing...
    20 KB (2,682 words) - 00:05, 27 December 2024
  •  Help FAQs Schools Schools' FAQ Frequently asked questions (FAQs) Index of FAQs Main FAQ Overview Readers Schools Contributing Editing Featured articles...
    14 KB (1,961 words) - 05:50, 8 May 2024
  • themselves with all three. Here are the “in-a-nutshell” definitions of each: Neutral point of view: Articles must not take sides, but should explain the sides...
    7 KB (1,042 words) - 01:00, 19 February 2019
  •  Help FAQs Contributing Contributing FAQ Frequently asked questions (FAQs) Index of FAQs Main FAQ Overview Readers Schools Contributing Editing Featured...
    21 KB (2,487 words) - 19:49, 9 November 2024
  • Wikipedia:Neutrality through accuracy (category Wikipedia neutral point of view)
    Wikipedia:Neutral point of view Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/FAQ Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Examples Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Handling neutrality...
    1 KB (107 words) - 00:10, 7 February 2022
  • is to write articles from a neutral point of view describing not just the dominant view, but significant alternative views as well, fairly, proportionately...
    8 KB (670 words) - 06:43, 8 November 2024
  •  Help FAQs Main Page Main Page FAQ Frequently asked questions (FAQs) Index of FAQs Main FAQ Overview Readers Schools Contributing Editing Featured articles...
    36 KB (4,738 words) - 20:55, 16 January 2025
  • edits an article to make it as a neutral point of view. I then edited the article to be more neutral and objective in view by making a few minor changes...
    251 KB (37,355 words) - 18:21, 14 April 2023
  • policies: neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research. Editors should familiarize themselves with all three, jointly interpreted: Neutral point...
    16 KB (1,814 words) - 23:05, 14 October 2024
  • article covering that subject. A point of view (POV) fork is a content fork deliberately created to avoid a neutral point of view (including undue weight), often...
    20 KB (2,630 words) - 08:12, 3 January 2025
  • include views that one side of a debate regards as cranky. We have other policies; one of the most important of them is the Neutral Point of View. If there...
    25 KB (3,632 words) - 08:20, 21 May 2023
  • banning of such a point of view held by a great many people and with evidence to support it is contrary to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View Policy. I...
    268 KB (38,836 words) - 09:18, 26 May 2022
  • misrepresentation of policy. The FAQ is for a controversial topic, yet it is heavily weighted toward a particular point of view of the contentious issue...
    20 KB (2,801 words) - 11:58, 27 February 2022
  • more user-friendly position. Should Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/FAQ remain a policy? If not, what parts of it should be moved to the main policy page...
    2 KB (382 words) - 01:05, 6 January 2024
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)