Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 April 26

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials and Geotechnical Engineering.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Randhirbharat (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

cover of a paper/essay. Dubious self-work claim and/or missing evidence of permission FASTILY 07:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 04:35, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:SenatorMatthewCarpenter.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pm06420 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused, low-res, superior version available: File:Matthew H. Carpenter - Brady-Handy.jpg FASTILY 07:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom Abzeronow (talk) 15:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 04:37, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment: ACK, I missed that this is only a worse version of another file when I de-prod-ded it, distracted by "far darker". An "unused low-res of dupe" is presumably some speedy reason. –84.46.53.175 (talk) 20:42, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:05, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Identity (Ausweis) card for Polish forced worker.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sjam2004 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

License/copyright info is unclear for the underlying work. Same file was deleted on Commons for missing such info. Wcam (talk) 12:07, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:05, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Meriden Sandstone Monument 1879.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Phil Simister (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Photo of a photo. There is no proper source information to evaluate the licensing. Whpq (talk) 19:07, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:06, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of England Showing Meriden 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Phil Simister (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Not a photo as claimed. This appears to be a screenshot of a map. no proper source information to evaluate licensing. Whpq (talk) 19:09, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 04:38, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, image appears to be a screenshot from Google Maps. --𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 17:26, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:06, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christopher E Rudd.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Catchacoma (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

portrait of (notable?) individual, dubious self-work claim. Source cited is "Cambridge Institute of Medical Research website, also Rudd lab website", also missing evidence of permission FASTILY 21:24, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:06, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:BalckBengalGoat.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Maqayum (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No evidence of authorship or of permission, apparently taken from the source cited in the original upload. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:25, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.