Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Positron Emission Tomography

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2010 at 20:28:40 (UTC)

Reason

Good EV. Though the quality appears fuzzy, this is what PETs look like.

Articles in which this image appears

Positron emission tomography, Scientific visualization, Fludeoxyglucose (18F), Full-body CT scan

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Biology

Creator

Damato

• Support as nominator --Nergaal (talk) 20:28, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, taking it on faith that this is of typical image quality for the genre, as you said. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 20:53, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Looking around I could find this as an example of recent PET - it seems to have a similar resolution quality. Nergaal (talk) 21:20, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• PET resolution on human-sized samples is typically 0.5-1.0 cm, this image is definately representative of the resolution you would expect to see. - Zephyris _Talk 10:35, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Very interesting. Wackywace ^{converse | contribs} 12:41, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Very detailed --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 00:56, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - oooh, colorful. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Pile on. Per above. Greg L (talk) 23:42, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:PET-MIPS-anim.gif --Makeemlighter (talk) 00:54, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]