Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Peacock front02 - melbourne zoo.jpg
Appearance
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b3/Peacock_front02_-_melbourne_zoo.jpg/250px-Peacock_front02_-_melbourne_zoo.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/92/Peacock.detail.arp.750pix.jpg/250px-Peacock.detail.arp.750pix.jpg)
A great image of an Indian Peacock taken at the Melbourne Zoo. I think it's a least as good as the existing FP, and probably a worthy replacement.
- Support Self Nom. --Fir0002 10:53, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Object purely due to depth of field problems. Not the entire feathers are seen and some cut right in the middle. Excellent picture otherwise. Michaelas10 (Talk) 11:41, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose We have an equally good quality photo with a much better composition here, already a FP in Commons. - Alvesgaspar 13:08, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose while pretty decent the pics are no improvement on the existing very similar pis as Alves pointed out. --Dschwen 14:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose. I agree with Alves too, the Commons FP is a little better and should probably be nominated here. Thats not to say that this picture is bad though. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 18:14, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose per Diliff. S.D. ¿п? § 00:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. For enc reasons we need to see the whole bird - this is cut off at the edges. Pstuart84 Talk 17:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Not promoted Trebor 00:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC)