Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Common knowledge" on Wikipedia
- conversation is that a certain fact is "common knowledge". It often turns out that most people don't actually share this knowledge. Even claims that are widely believed...8 KB (1,250 words) - 20:17, 12 January 2025
- page. The result was delete. Sandstein 07:44, 5 August 2011 (UTC) Common Knowledge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...4 KB (383 words) - 11:51, 9 February 2022
- Wikipedia Wikipedia:Common knowledge (WP:CK), an information page about citing sources for obvious facts Wikipedia:Common.js and common.css, files allowing...933 bytes (158 words) - 19:49, 28 September 2021
- false one, because common means different things in those two phrases. In the phrase common knowledge the word common means "held in common" i.e. essentially...8 KB (1,001 words) - 16:25, 2 February 2022
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-01-01/Book review (section Common Knowledge: An Ethnography of Wikipedia)Common Knowledge: An Ethnography of Wikipedia: Dariusz Jemielniak's book is the newest about Wikipedia, published in Poland in 2013 and with an English...14 KB (2,351 words) - 02:03, 6 January 2024
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-07-30/Book review (section Jemielniak's Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Wikipedia)Knowledge or unreality?: In Common Knowledge: An Ethnography of Wikipedia, Dariusz Jemielniak discusses Wikipedia from the standpoint of an experienced...20 KB (4,647 words) - 02:08, 6 January 2024
- specific type of reference work properly containing articles on topics of knowledge. Wikipedia employs the concept of notability to avoid indiscriminate inclusion...6 KB (737 words) - 16:05, 21 June 2024
- unrealistic. Therefore, this essay gives some practical advice. Not citing common knowledge and not providing bibliographic entries for very famous works is also...6 KB (791 words) - 05:31, 16 March 2025
- The easiest way to avoid making common mistakes is to know what they are. Some of the most common recurring errors in Wikipedia articles have been documented...14 KB (1,950 words) - 13:12, 12 November 2024
- processes as they are developed. Even though the creation of a common space for internal knowledge is necessary to collect different types of educational resources...10 KB (1,045 words) - 02:15, 4 February 2020
- different disciplines use conflicting styles." – WT:Manual of Style/FAQ The common-style fallacy (CSF) is the flawed reasoning that if a particular typographic...37 KB (5,305 words) - 16:39, 13 November 2024
- research, thinking or resources a common man need to restate the preceding statement to ‘no one can have the knowledge to make a thing which cannot exhibit...19 KB (2,572 words) - 05:35, 5 February 2022
- WP:CN was formerly a shortcut to: Wikipedia:Common knowledge Wikipedia:Community sanction noticeboard (inactive) You may be looking for one of the following:...709 bytes (97 words) - 19:48, 6 August 2023
- highly specialized Bahrain the Bahrain field and is not generally common knowledge outside the community. Adds articles to Category:Low-importance Bahrain...3 KB (151 words) - 17:20, 17 July 2016
- of the antecedent X? Or is it about Aumann's set-theoretic model of common knowledge? Or is it about conditions in the real world that ensure this model...4 KB (257 words) - 00:12, 31 October 2023
- "common knowledge" and I don't know if it should have references. Just asking: wouldn't the "Further Reading" section mitigate the "common knowledge"...4 KB (730 words) - 17:14, 18 February 2008
- that people from other countries may not have the same perspective or common knowledge. Indeed, even the very concept of blue varies between cultures and...8 KB (1,056 words) - 12:24, 18 February 2025
- seem "common knowledge". Topics that seem "common knowledge", are worth covering, when we have good, reliable sources, because "common knowledge" can be...11 KB (1,223 words) - 04:16, 1 November 2024
- all aware, Wikipedians must always assume good faith. It's similarly common knowledge that one should also assume the assumption of good faith, and perhaps...4 KB (509 words) - 00:07, 5 June 2023
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2020-03-01/Recent research (section "Wikipedia: Why is the common knowledge resource still neglected by academics?")ISSN 0165-5515. Jemielniak, Dariusz (2019-12-01). "Wikipedia: Why is the common knowledge resource still neglected by academics?". GigaScience. 8 (12). doi:10...19 KB (2,231 words) - 02:45, 6 January 2024
- WS about this, BTW. It is (quite) a common behaviour in technical/technocratic circles where technical knowledge is assumed. That works fine on the wiki
- scary! See Replies to common objections for an explanation of why the system still works. Editing our existing set of knowledge is great, but we'd like