Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winged sea caribou (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Winged sea caribou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject of this article is not notable enough for Wikipedia. It is a fictional creature that appears on a single coat of arms created by the Canadian Heraldic Authority, which has created thousands of coats of arms and hybrid creatures. This creature is not any more notable than any of the others that they have created, and has only ever been used once. It is also not an important creature in Canadian folklore or mythology, as it was created in 2007. Di (they-them) (talk) 02:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. Di (they-them) (talk) 02:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Di (they-them) (talk) 02:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Coat of arms of the Federal Court of Canada doesn't warrant an article, so why would an unnotable element of an unnotable topic? Clarityfiend (talk) 05:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. AdoTang (talk) 17:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete since google search returns no notable results. Notability might be hidden but is highly unlikely and not substantiated by any references --Trimton (talk) 23:13, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.