Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Gormley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Provisional IRA East Tyrone Brigade. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-14 02:14Z

Tony Gormley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Delete: Non-notable; boilerplate background as with six of the eight men killed at Loughgall, except Padraig McKearney and Jim Lynagh; the other six should be consolidated on one page - perhaps Loughgall. El chulito 13:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

• Strong Keep:: - one of a the notoriuos East Tyrone unit - Loughall wasnt the only operation that Gormely was involved in - granted the article needs improving. The nomination for deletion is a severe case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT.--Vintagekits 10:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong keep. Meets several criteria from WP:BIO.GiollaUidir 11:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or merge with other five IRA men with "boilerplate" (as it was put by another editor) histories. There is nothing notable about this individual. Again User:Vintagekits' comments are in violation of WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL.Inthegloaming 14:24, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable person and does not deserve a seperate article. Shyam ^(T/C) 20:34, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- non notable Astrotrain 22:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge & Redirect with other men in main article about the Loughall ambush/skirmish. --Jackyd101 01:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge & Redirect as per Jackyd101. Logoistic 03:21, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge & Redirect as per Jackyd101. Jdorney 13:32, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per Jackyd101, however this article should either be redirected to Antony Gormley, who is somewhat more notable than this individual, or made into a disambig page. AdorableRuffian 22:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Completely non-notable.--Major Bonkers 15:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable. - Kittybrewster 16:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Didn't do anything except join a terrorist organisation and own an engineering firm, which of itself is not notable, hardly the Hughes Tool Company. --Couter-revolutionary 19:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or merge/redirect: non-notable per nom.Conrad Falk 23:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.