Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacey Scowley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 18:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stacey Scowley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A WP:BLP that on the face of it (one stated reference?...and the article has been tagged since 2013?) fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO, and especially WP:ENT. Appearances in TV commercials dating from over 10 years ago and asserted appearances in various TV shows (as an uncredited non-speaking character? as an actor with a bit part? as the lead? - readers do not know) do not make an actress notable enough for a Wikipedia article. It is possible that Miss Scowley might be notable enough for a Wikipedia article because of her appearances this season as "Carol-Joan" on Fresh Off the Boat but I am uncertain as to this character's credit-status on the show (guest-star/co-star/"with so&so") and I think the notability issue is something that should be hashed out in an AFD discussion. Shearonink (talk) 09:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Do not delete. She is funny - www.scowley.com/stand-up/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.238.99.2 (talk) 15:56, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete acting in a few commercials does not make one notable enough to warrant an article.Grammarphile (talk) 18:14, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:NACTOR DarjeelingTea (talk) 18:16, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The one keep !vote amounts to WP:ILIKEIT and there isn't any reason to believe that WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR applies. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:26, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.