Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Searles, California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anyone is free to create a redirect after but I don't see a consensus (nor even really an argument) to do that. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:46, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Searles, California

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The interchange between the Trona Railway and the UP (formerly SP); that's all that has ever been at this isolated point in the desert. Mangoe (talk) 22:56, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:07, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:07, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination. The place is a tiny junction that lacks notability.TH1980 (talk) 03:20, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Would redirecting to an appropriate target be more helpful than outright deletion? Newyorkbrad (talk) 11:43, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I thought about that. The only possible target would be the Trona Railway, and I wasn't quite convinced it would make sense. But I'm willing to be persuaded. Mangoe (talk) 14:01, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.