Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SGT Hollie Chapman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 01:04, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SGT Hollie Chapman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has no particular claim to notability in the lede making it difficult to identify notability. Searches of google news and books failed to bring up any sources on this person. Straight google search didn't identify any references either save the IMDB one (which is already doubtful). So, lacking notability and being an unsourced biographical article on a living person, I think it should be deleted GraemeLeggett (talk) 20:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article fails to meet WP:GNG, WP:MILPEOPLE. — -dainomite 21:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Kumioko (talk) 22:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Nick-D (talk) 23:09, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (talk to me) @ 23:58, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (banter) @ 23:58, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sounds like a run of the mill US soldier to me. I can't seem to find exactly which newspaper the article is referring to, but being chief editor of a newspaper isn't inherently notable. I wouldn't say participating in a documentary about a comedian visiting US troops in Afghanistan is particularly notable either. Without reliable sources this doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Funny ^Pika! 04:17, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet WP:GNG, dang near an A7 speedy deletion. EricSerge (talk) 12:53, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Buckshot06 (talk) 05:17, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. W. B. Wilson (talk) 05:22, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, subject has received mention in a reliable source, however the subject has not received significant coverage in non-primary reliable sources, therefore the subject does not appear to be notable as defined by WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. May the subject continue to serve the United States as a Soldier for a good long career, but she does not appear to be notable.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 17:16, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. Intothat darkness 16:50, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete privacy invasion against WP:BLP. Barney the barney barney (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:32, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per User:Barney the barney barney. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesn't meet N or GNG and it is a BLP. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 21:10, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.