Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Barlock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:12, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Barlock

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 01:57, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 03:13, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 03:13, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 03:13, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as he has played in professional ice hockey leagues, including the highest-level ice hockey league in France. Changing to delete as notability is not assumed for those leagues he has played in. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Look at WP:NHOCKEY/LA. The French league confers no presumptive notability. Joeykai (talk) 03:36, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There is nothing about playing professional hockey (especially brief stints in low-level minor leagues) that meets any extant notability criteria. No evidence this fellow meets the GNG. Ravenswing 13:04, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not finding significant coverage. Rlendog (talk) 16:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NHOCKEY--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:43, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.