Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rogue (musician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Crüxshadows. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:11, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rogue (musician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. Fails the notability for music criteria. - TheMagnificentist 09:34, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:13, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Crüxshadows. All the sources are about the subjects involvement with the notable band The Crüxshadows. Searching found nothing helpful. Per WP:MUSICBIO this should be a redirect because the Rogue lacks coverage for activity independent of the band. Gab4gab (talk) 17:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 18:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Cruxshadows. All sources seem to be blogs and social media. No independent notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:10, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Cruxshadows.Passes WP:GNG.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:48, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.