Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relational Philosophy
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 04:32, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relational Philosophy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I am 90% sure that this article was created by Ardeshir Sepahsalar, the person who is cited as coming up with the theory discussed. In any case, a google search of 'relational philosophy' + this man's name only yields his pages and wikipedia related pages, so the theory does not satisfy the notability criteria. And, the only references for the theory are on Ardeshir Sepahsalar's web pages. Anarchia 11:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for no assertion or citation of notability, just as with the other AfD about the author. If for some reason the Ardeshir Sepahsalar article is kept, this article should still be merged into the main article (with a redirect on this page). The ideas appear to be those of one individual who is himself of uncertain notability. Wikipedia is not a place for things made up in school one day. -Markeer 15:17, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, promotional, violates WP:NPOV, to a lesser extent WP:SPAM, and likely WP:COI. Personally, I think WP:BOLLOCKS might apply, too. Realkyhick 15:25, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nothing really to add to the nomination and to Realkyhick's comment. The only thing that appears to be new here is the jargon. - Smerdis of Tlön 19:55, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable. See also Ardeshir Sepahsalar. Deletion proposals noted on User:Scriptoria's talk page. See his contributions [1]. Banno 20:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.