Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qontext

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 11:21, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Qontext

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Coverage is limited to routine acquisition news, interview-ish articles and press releases, thus failing NCORP. Any content salvageable from this promotional article can be merged into Autodesk. M4DU7 (talk) 00:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 00:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 00:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 00:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 00:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 00:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this is covered only in these business-newswire sites, I don't think those are reputable or fulfill GNG. --Ysangkok (talk) 04:13, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; sources are highly suspect Spiderone 09:15, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.