Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Franklin (soldier)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:19, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable combat casualty.Plus, I also find the "Personal Comments to the editor" being used as a reference highly questionable.Delete Deyyaz [ Talk | Contribs ] 17:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Seconded.Delete TgC19
- Delete - according to the policy on biographies of living persons, any information on a living person that is not fully referenced is to be quickly deleted, to prevent harm to said individuals. While I respect MCpl Franklin's service and the sacrifices that he and his family have made, I don't feel the article as currently written is appropriate for WP.Michael Dorosh 17:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete,
no memorialsinjury in a combat zone is not a claim of notability. Gazpacho 17:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply] - Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 19:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom. He didn't even die in the attack. --Corporal Punishment 20:11, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Not that there's anything wrong with that. Gazpacho 21:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete One dude being injured in Afghanistan is like a needle in a knitting shop. Dev920 21:18, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Per nom. A soldier being injured in Afghanistan, Vietnam, or any other modern war is not notable for a wikipedia article. will381796 22:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - we should come to a consensus about these kinds of articles, so don't speedy it. - Richardcavell 23:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. --Kinu t/c 16:14, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.