Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mo Furu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:24, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mo Furu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no sources, And there is no indication of notability. Happy Attack Dog (Bark! Bark!) 13:38, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There was a request by the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Chinese military history task force for an article on Mo Furu. Please contact the members of that project. Zee money (talk) 14:05, 1 May 2014 (UTC)Zee money[reply]

I have no knowledge about this bloke, but he is mentioned in Jocelyn and McEwen's The Long March published by Constable in 2006. He would generally meet WP:SOLDIER having commanded a division and later an army. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 05:46, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Two references added establishing notability per WP:SOLDIER. Unfortunately Jocelyn and McEwen's book is not available for preview at Google books (snippet view only), but he's definitely in there.  Philg88 ^♦talk 08:33, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The rank of major-general is notable as is his involvement in a major conflict. There are two reliable sources given in the article which back that up. Rincewind42 (talk) 15:23, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. General officers are considered to be notable under WP:SOLDIER. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:18, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.