Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/March Bandness

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:41, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March Bandness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been around for a very long time (since 2007), but my review of the page history shows that it has never had any secondary sources, only external links. A Google search on my end turned up no coverage of the subject either. As it stands, it appears to fail both WP:RS and WP:N. ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 23:26, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Examples linked in article are not reliable independent sources with significant coverage about the subject to satisfy GNG. MarginalCost (talk) 00:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 00:04, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.--Tdl1060 (talk) 21:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I could find no sources covering this event/idea in depth at all. Not notable. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 12:53, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 17:27, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.