Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Doxer
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh 00:30, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Kathleen Doxer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Fails WP:BIO. While a number of sources are given, they do not contain substantial coverage; the most detailed seems to be this one, which is from the local chamber of commerce (not very impressive). The article also contains some copyvio from there. The book cited is not a biography of the person, but about an organization which she sponsored; it mentions her briefly (as far as I could see from Google Books preview). PROD contested with request to list the article on AfD. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 13:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Also, most news articles (Boston Globe, Washington Post) mention her in the context of the store, which closed 4 years ago.--Sethacus 16:04, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Addendum Apparently, the store re-opened a few months later, but there hasn't been much press since.--Sethacus 16:09, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, not only fails WP:BIO but WP:N in general. --Nenyedi TalkDeeds@ 16:14, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete as it appears the chain is notable but she personally fails primary sourcing criteria. Article about the chain looks like it would pass WP:CORP and she could be mentioned there. --Dhartung | Talk 20:24, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.