Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Lamb (producer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Decisions about merging or renaming can be discussed on the talk page. JoshuaZ 17:57, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Lamb (producer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Tagged as a nnbio speedy, but actually Googling the 'Lyon-Lamb' thing produces something: [1], and so I'd like AfD to take a more leisurely look. Clearly, the article is a danger to the casual reader, who may accidentally gouge out their eyes on it, but no doubt the diligent AfDers are able to see beyond that. Splash - tk 21:03, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep At risk of sight and limb, I took a look at it. John Lamb is notable for the reasons given, but the stub needs lots of expansion, wikification and sourcing work. Askari Mark (Talk) 03:17, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I only tagged it as a speedy as at the time it had no content other than the photo. I have no opinion on the article as it stands now... ChrisTheDude 07:21, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Needs tidying, but a definite keep. Looks like Lyon-Lamb won a (technical?) Academy Award in 1979 for Tom Waits for No One. Ultimately, may be better to rename as Lyon-Lamb, and discuss the company ahead of the man? However, that's an editorial/content decision. --DeLarge 11:58, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per DeLarge. Oscars are nothing to sneeze at. --Aarktica 16:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.