Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jodi Arias: Dirty Little Secret

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nom's deletion rationale was withdrawn, but not eligible for speedy keep due to delete !vote. (non-admin closure) czar · · 18:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jodi Arias: Dirty Little Secret (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:N not established; only secondary source is a copy-paste of a press release. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I agree the article needs a total re-write but the movie has indeed been filmed and will be broadcasted and a highly notable case.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:16, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. A made-for-TV movie that hasn't even aired yet and hasn't gotten any notice that I can see. Notability is not inherited. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

News search for Jodi Arias movie

News search for Jodi Arias, Lifetime

• Keep The film has completed, has a set air date of June 22 2013 (next Saturday), and is getting coverage to meet both the cautions of WP:NFF and the coverage required by WP:NF. Flat-out deletion of a completed Lifetime film does not serve the project. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:53, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: third-party sources are available now. I change my stance on this article to neutrality. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:01, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. A made-for-TV movie that is not at all deserving of it's own article. Should I make an article for all movies I see on TV? Also the content of this "movie" will no doubt be very bias and negative towards poor Jodi.87.232.1.48 (talk) 14:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Disagreement with the content is not a valid reason to keep anything off Wikipedia. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:49, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Indeed, any "made for tv movie" could have an article if inclusion criteria are met. And if as anonymous IP 87.232.1.48 you do create articles on TV films, please make sure the topics have enough coverage. Thank you, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:07, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Plenty of film/television articles get written before the airdate. I don't see the problem here. It is about a notable topic, so meets WP:GNG. Paul MacDermott (talk) 20:43, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Passes WP:NF in its current state. SL93 (talk) 23:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, significant amount of secondary source coverage, — Cirt (talk) 16:46, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.