Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Paul Sederholm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 06:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Paul Sederholm

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article lacks sifficient strong sources to pass GNG. Beyond this, the article in a lot of ways over emphasizes Sederholm's importance to the history of the Hill Cumorah Pageant. The decision to end missionary participation was based on a directive from LDS Church president Harold B. Lee given when he visited the pageant in 1973. I have the impression that other changes in the casting were also made higher up. Sederholm was the person implementing these decisions, not the one making them. No other indication that he is notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 📞 What I've done 02:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:36, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- the article does not establish notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Coverage is not significant and independent. Being mentioned in an article or writing one doesn't do the job of meeting WP:GNG. 2601:248:4500:9523:43C:32C0:AC8B:3F10 (talk) 20:16, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.