Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Gore (actor) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ミラ P 18:44, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Gore (actor)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable child actor that doesn't meet WP:NACTOR and WP:BIO. If I saw the citation of IMDb, considering it unreliable. Last month, I nominate this entry for deletion, but there's no consensus due to lack of WP:BLP. Ni3Xposite (talk) 01:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:55, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:55, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - This nomination, only one week after the previous AFD was closed as No Consensus, is tendentious. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: This was just closed as a "No Consensus", although three out of the four votes were to "Keep" and there was no policy reasoning provided for the sole "Delete" vote. I have no idea why this has been nominated again. I am voting "Keep" again for the reasons I provided in the initial AfD. Dflaw4 (talk) 04:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I don't see the problem. He gets coverage. He was sixth-billed in a Woody Allen film (Wonder Wheel) just under Kate Winslet and Jim Belushi. He's got a recurring role on Billions. Variety said that 2018 was "a huge year for Gore". What is the argument for delete? -- Toughpigs (talk) 04:17, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Invitation to John Pack Lambert, Watchbotx and PK650 to participate in this AfD. They, along with me, voted in the original AfD. Dflaw4 (talk) 04:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is weird. I seem to remember there was clear consensus to keep in this case, but I didn't follow up. In my opinion there's enough coverage ([1], [2], [3]) to warrant an article. Best, PK650 (talk) 22:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NACTOR with significant roles in multiple notable television series and films as confirmed with coverage in reliable sources, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:46, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we still do not have the level of sources we need to justify having an article on a minor. We should respect people's, especially minors, privacy, and not create articles without good quality sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:39, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John Pack Lambert, there are Variety sources, Deadline sources, and more. Sure, the article itself could be worked on, but surely the existence of these reliable sources would meet WP:GNG? Dflaw4 (talk) 01:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.