Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It's JerryTime!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. Daniel (talk) 05:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's JerryTime! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing comes up on Google. This article does not meet WP:GNG. It looks like no more than a couple dozen episodes where ever released and it's been inactive for over a decade. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Winning an Emmy seems notable? Likeanechointheforest (talk) 19:51, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Likeanechointheforest: I don't know how I missed that, but you're right because that would meet the second requirement of WP:WEBCRIT. The subject of the article is never going to generate more coverage and will never be more than a stub. Would anyone be opposed to merging the article into Jerry Zucker and Kristen Schaal? Or is it acceptable to simply leave it as a stub forever? TipsyElephant (talk) 00:23, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I looked into this a little more and realized that WP:WEBCRIT uses the wording "may be notable" not that an award determines notability. I would question whether the subject is notable despite the award based on the fact that there are absolutely no independent and reliable secondary sources to demonstrate WP:GNG. TipsyElephant (talk) 14:26, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TipsyElephant: I think it'd be appropriate to merge it! Likeanechointheforest (talk) 13:52, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

•  Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary).

--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify, as winning two daytime Emmys and córdoba best animation is quite notable, but this page doesn't have enough about the show to justify it having a page just yet. Hyperwave11 (talk) 05:12, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.