Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insert Funn13 Here

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  15:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article presumably authored by one of the creators, Beast Megatron (talk • contribs). Was tagged for notability; tag removed without comment. Wikipedia tops the Google hits, which proves that this is effective as WP:SPAM if nothing else; gets 7 unique ghits of 69 total. No references cited and the Google results including nothing that could be construed as a reliable source. Fails to demonstrate notability per WP:WEB; fails to meet WP:V; presumably WP:SPAM and/or WP:VAIN. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:36, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete. Totally, inexplicably, irredeemably and utterly fails to assert notability per WP:WEB. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 13:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for now, unless secondary reference are included which substantiate notability. Addhoc 14:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can find nothing that makes this notable, and it fails WP:WEB as such. Thε Halo ^Θ 16:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - This "webcomic" is actually hosted on a forum thread. I didn't tag it as CSD in case one of those "A7 is for bios only" admins removed it. - Hahnchen 16:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete, webcomic hosted on a forum? Utterly fails WP:WEB, possible WP:SPAM per the large collection of external links to each... and... every... issue. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Insert detetion here. Irongargoyle 17:01, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no assertion of having any chance of satisfying WP:WEB. Considering that is a webcomic hosted on a forum, both of which must provide evidence of notablility, this is a perfect storm of non-notability. Also, potential WP:VSCA per the lengthy description of the entire storyline and links to every single issue.-- danntm ^T _C 20:41, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.