Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IContact (3rd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was already deleted and redirected to Cision by TomStar81 per G4. Procedural close. (non-admin closure) clpo13(talk) 21:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- IContact (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page has been recreated despite the fact it's been deleted more then once by consensus. It's content is promotional and appears to be used only for a promotional nature. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 19:39, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:32, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:32, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as it passes WP:CORPDEPTH. There are many independent reliable sources about this company plus there are several awards won by iContact. These are not press releases. If the concern is promotional then the article is salvageable. --Krielmasin (talk) 05:19, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: We need a consensus without any prejudice as all the references are reliable sources and there are many more. Krielmasin (talk) 05:27, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.