Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garric Simonsen (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:02, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Garric Simonsen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article on an artist created by an WP:SPA that, judging by the fact that the username is the same as the artist's official website, is likely connected to the subject. The subject does not appear to pass the WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. While several references are included here, these either do not mention this individual at all, or merely list them as one of the artists included in a gallery. Searches did not turn up much else - image galleries and mentions of participating in an exhibit, but nothing that could be actual significant coverage. The closest that it comes is articles in college newspapers for colleges that he was a faculty member of, which I don't believe would be sufficient for actually passing the WP:GNG. It looks like this article went through an AFD back in 2015, but was closed as No Consensus due to minimal participation, and so has been languishing here, poorly sourced, ever since. Rorshacma (talk) 17:22, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Artists, and Washington. Rorshacma (talk) 17:22, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Not covered in the Getty ULAN, some limited coverage here [1] and here [2] (second one is a limited view based in my IP so I can't pull most of it up). I don't think these are enough for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 19:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I am not finding RS for the biographical information presented in the article. Previous request for deletion was closed as "no consensus", but the article was only defended by the creator. Subject fails WP:ARTIST. WP:TOO SOON, no substantial coverage and not in any notable collections. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 19:37, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.