Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flying horses
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was REDIRECT to Pegasus. Who would want a flying horse, anyway? Myself, I had enough trouble staying on the back of a walking horse. — JIP | Talk 19:15, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Get out of here, if this one survives all articles can. Molotov (talk)
23:13, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- It's survived pretty well at Pegasus. Redirect. —Cryptic (talk) 23:37, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Cryptic is right, in a sense, but this reeks of OR and it might as well be called Flying Humans because who the hell would waste time making a horse fly instead? freshgavinTALK 23:40, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- You don't need to make a horse fly. They buzz around stables in the summer. It's a pity to delete an article containing the immortal phrase adding wings to mammols [sic] is just the tip of the iceberg as I feel that, having seen that phrase, my life is somehow enriched, but despite that, Delete. Tonywalton |Talk 23:03, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Pegasus, as per Cryptic. Note that the article creator has tried once to remove the AFD tag. Saberwyn 00:10, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Pegasus. --Aquillion 02:02, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Pegasus like winged horse and flying horse do until such a time more of them can be mentioned. - Mgm|(talk) 09:11, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I redirected flying horse after seeing this, so that's not really a good basis. There used to be a more general article at winged equine before it was redirected. —Cryptic (talk) 15:23, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.