Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene McCullough
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 13:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Eugene McCullough (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This seems to be about a secondary headmaster with little or no claim to fame/notability. Much of the article is merely a list of staff that has already been deleted on at least one occasion. Paste (talk) 17:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
*Weak Keep and add source needed tag. TheProf | Talk 17:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- DELETE: Article deleted by Orangemike at 03:20, 14 February 2008 under the name Eugene J. McCullough and McCullough's data transferred to St. Michael's page. Creator of this page, who is almost a single-issue contributor, recreated it without the middle initial (J.) for obvious purposes of evasion. Nothing has changed to make the person more notable since last month, although the article has been expanded, mostly with filler. Not every successful schoolteacher in the world is notable for Wikipedia purposes, which is a message worth sending.
- ADD: Marie McKenna as affiliated page for deletion. Crazy8 (talk) 19:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Marie McKenna, Eugene McCullough & the redirect page Eugene J McCullough. Articles fail Wikipedia:Notability (academics), WP:BIO, and lack reliable sources. Pete.Hurd (talk) 04:18, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No secondary sources, therefore we shouldn't have an article. If he is notable, people independent of him will have written about him. One Night In Hackney303 09:44, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete In light of the info posted by Orangemike. I change my vote. TheProf | Talk 12:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.